關於 by your side意思 ，我們在網路上蒐集到這些相關的討論、資訊與評價

我們到底應該用哪一種英文口音溝通?

真的要看同學的目的和說話場合是什麼。

若是為了跟聽眾產生共鳴，那可能用他們熟悉的口音和說話方式，你說的話才會直達到他們的心坎裡。

同學來看一下Presentality分析李光耀 (新加坡開國最主要的領導人)與人民溝通的方式和他選擇使用的口音。

★★★★★★★★★★★★

📌 不知為何，幾天前我的 Youtube 突然推薦了前新加坡總理李光耀 (Lee Kuan Yew) 接受西方媒體採訪的影片。

我知道很多名人說李光耀是他們最敬佩的領導人之一，但我從來沒看過他說話的影片， 我就決定來看看他是否真的很會溝通。

結果，我的天啊，太強大了。

就算影片是幾十年前的，影像跟聲音的畫質都不是很好，你還是可以感受到他講話的力道、威嚴、還有魅力:

https://youtu.be/VexrmTacOAA

我們就來解析他的一些溝通及說話技巧吧。

★★★★★★★★★★★★

📌 如果這是你第一次聽他說話，你第一個注意到的，很可能是他的英文有多流利。畢竟人家可是在英國劍橋大學受教育的，英文根本就是母語。

但除了口音之外，最能展現語文能力的，是他的用字遣詞。

選擇有效的字眼，及潛在意義。

當第一位記者問他，他對美國在越戰使用武力的看法時（有點敏感啊！），他的回答，每個字都選擇的很巧妙。

*我把值得注意的幾個字，用大寫標示起來：

I would like to see a great deal more CAUTION, a more SELECTIVE EXERCISE of your enormous range of weapons you’ve got, and more BRAINS AND FEET — preferably Vietnamese brains and feet — rather than more power and GADGETRY.

他回答這個問題的時候當然要小心，不能過度批評美國政府，所以他選的字，也符合了這位記者想要表達的 “restraint” (克制)

•Caution — 會比 “Should use power more carefully” 要來的更溫和 (你可以自己唸出來看看，連 caution 的字本身都比較柔和)。

•Selective — 他不告訴美國怎麼使用武力，只是說 be selective，就是要選擇性的使用。

•Brains and feet, rather than gadgetry — 這邊也很巧妙，把當地的人，用 brains and feet 來代表，更能強調他們的長處，比 “local people” 更能夠有說服力。而且他選擇 gadgetry — 就是 fancy tools 的意思，但其實就是武器，但如果他說武器就太直白了，說成 “fancy tools” 又可以強調這個的短處，讓人覺得沒錯，brains and feet 確實比較好。

他能夠選擇好的字眼的原因，其中當然有他受過的教育、以及過去累積的經驗。但同樣重要的，是他不疾不徐的風格。

如果我們把他現場說出上面那段話的每個停頓點寫出來，變成分行，會變成這樣：

I would like…

… to see a great deal more caution…
… a more selective exercise of…
your…
enormous range of weapons you’ve got, and uh…
more brains and feet…

他幾乎每幾個字就會停頓一下，不但給自己時間思考，也可以表現出深思熟慮的感覺。

適時的停頓，可以讓你沈穩、有力!

停頓加上強調字眼的力道有多強大，我們看接下來這段就知道了，這也是我整個訪談中最喜歡的一段之一，在影片中的 17分25秒左右開始。

他對記者表示，他這次來美國，是要看美國人對於越戰，是否真的有決心。

我同樣把他停頓的地方分行，而且用大寫，表示他特別強調的字：

You MUST demonstrate, and which…
I’ve really come here to understand better…
is whether YOU…
as a PEOPLE…
have got that resolution (註：不是解決的意思喔，是決心)…
that stamina, that perseverance, AND…
most important of all…
*這裡明顯放慢速度，還對聽眾眨眼一下
infinite patience, AND…
*這裡一個超級長的停頓…
the capacity to hold back…
your desire to settle this quickly and get it over with, because this is a very different kind of war…
The other side is not in uniform. You are.

*還記得我們上次提到的長短句交錯嗎？這一段是不是就有用到這個原則呢？

我相信看上面的一段，就可以感受到他說話的力道，但還是推薦大家去看影片。這段話他 deliver 出去的方式，實在太好了。

尤其是說到 “infinite patience” 的時候，他整個把音拉的超級長，似乎想要讓很長很長的音，來讓聽眾感受到那個 “infinite”。

Note: 這是另一個演講技巧：就是讓你的音調、語氣、音量等等，來傳達字面上的意思。沈重的訊息，就用低沈緩慢的方式來說。要強調時間很長或過的很慢，就把字句的音本身拉長等等。

他連說到這段的時候，臉上的表情都很有趣，好像在跟美國人上一課：

★★★★★★★★★★★★

📌 Speaking the Audience’s Language

李光耀也很會看聽眾來調整自己的溝通方式。

如上面提到，李光耀上面對西方媒體說話的用字，都是比較有學問的，完全展示他的知識水平。畢竟東方人到了西方，不能被看貶。如果他說的是 highly-educated English，西方聽眾會比較覺得 ah he’s on our level!

你看看他對自己生涯的回顧，寫的多文雅：

I am not given to making sense out of life — or coming up with some grand narrative on it — other than to measure it by what you think you want to do in life.

他不是寫 “I don’t try to make sense of life”，而是 “I am not given to making sense out of life”。他還在後面加個 “grand narrative”。滿文學的。

但他跟自己國家的老百姓說話，就不是這樣了，也不能這樣。

把上面他跟西方媒體訪談的英文，與下面這個對新加坡人民做的演說相比，就很明顯了。甚至連口音也變了！

https://youtu.be/bGMKiv8-bzM

開頭他說：

I hope to tell you what merger means, why it’s good for all of us, why it’s coming, and why some people are deliberately creating trouble and difficulty…

很白話文對不對？

他就是一個很會看聽眾說話的人。當地媒體就曾經指出...

📌 完整文章請參考Presentality! Learn from their experience and expertise!

★★★★★★★★★★★★

📌 我以前一直認為，反正新加坡不算個民主，李光耀完全掌權，當然可以照他自己的意思去做事情。但看完這些影片，讀了一些分析，發現我想錯了。

新加坡這麼小的地方，沒什麼資源，周圍環繞著這麼多的勢力，不但有東南亞的大國們，也有外來的勢力：美國、英國、澳洲、日本等等… 他是如何在這麼複雜的歷史背景下，不只持續掌權，生存，而且還打造今天的新加坡？

我相信他的溝通能力，一定是關鍵：對不同的勢力，在不同的時機點，用對的故事跟語言，傳達他需要傳達的訊息。

It’s not just about speaking. It’s about speaking to achieve your goals.

★★★★★★★★★★★★

相關詞彙:

•accent 口音，腔調
•pronunciation 發音
•enunciate 清楚地念（字）；清晰地發（音）
•intonation （尤指對話語意義有影響的）語調，聲調
•intelligibility 可解度，清晰度，可懂度，明瞭度，可理解性

BBC發音相關文章:
https://www.bbc.com/ukchina/trad/vert-fut-43590187

【力量訓練的「訓練量」該如何設定？】

跑者的訓練量俗稱「跑量」，單位是「公里」，所以月跑量三百是指一個月總訓練距離300公里。在力量訓練圈的「訓練量」（Training Volume）常是「總反覆次數」 （Total Repetition）的同義詞；而「月總量」就是指一個月的總反覆次數，像我們會建議初跑者的月跑量最好不要超過100公里一樣，在做重訓時，有沒有一個區間可以讓大家參考呢？下面是《The System》的作者群建議：

#以下為譯文：
以剛接觸訓練的新手來說，月總量最好從750次（總反覆次數）開始；而菁英運動員的上限設在1,600次。在前蘇聯時代，我們親眼看到他們運動員以更高的月總量進行訓練。然而，我們後來也發現這跟他們使用加強運動表現的補給品有關，那使運動員能更快恢復。

總反覆次數是指在單一個週期中（這裡是指中週期）所有基本力量動作重複次數的總合。因此總反覆次數750的意思是在不同的訓練強度與動作中總共累計的次數，但這個數字不包括輔助訓練的動作。

從帳面上來看，750這個數字分配到一個月十二到十六次課表當中，看起來似乎很小，但我們這們所定的750這個數字比較像是「基本量」，而非下限，如果總反覆次數低於750下，就不會為運動員的成長帶來實質的影響。表 4.14 中的數值並不是意味著高水平或菁英運動員在四週內的總反覆次數永遠不會有低於1,000次情況發生，那只是維持成長的基本量。對運動員的恢復能力影響最大的是訓練量，因此這些範圍中比較需要注意的是上限的數值。若月總量超過上限值，恢復能力將快速到受到侵害，而且侵害的速度比任何其他因素都快。

一位菁英水準的運動員可以在一個月的時間裡完成1,000次以下的訓練，就算在恢復期也經常發生。然而，訓練新手若超過1,000次的上限，大都要承擔受傷或嚴重過度訓練的風險。

許多教練擔心他們的運動員練不夠，所以無法有效獲得力量和爆發力的進步。他們不想因為目標定得太低而有所保留，這讓他們感覺是「浪費」了一個月的訓練時間。剛開始採用這個方法來訓練時有這種感覺很自然，我們系統中的每一位教練也都曾經歷過相同的掙扎。

美國的力量教練已經把「訓練要用盡全力」當作一種信念，訓練完還有餘力好像就會覺得不夠認真。但請相信我們。我們說的方法很少失敗，也幾乎沒有過度訓練的風險，這些區間已被證明能最有效地幫助運動員進步。

在調整運動員的訓練量時，需要考慮到他們的技巧、經驗、過去的醫療史、訓練史、性別、實際年齡與訓練年齡。

我們過去的慘痛教訓可以讓你少走許多彎路。當你在訓練量的拿捏上猶豫不決時，原則是寧少勿多。寧可因量太少沒進步，也不要犯下過量訓練的錯誤。

總訓練量不包括輔助訓練或是特別針對「局部效果」的練習次數。那些動作主要是為了強化特定肌肉或是使全身力量動作能做得更好的輔助性訓練，所以我們不會把它們算在總訓練量中。
最受我們重視的力量訓練動作不只對身體的負擔很大，技術要求也很高；正因如此，我們才會嚴格限制訓練量。

雖然輔助訓練不會被計算在總訓練量裡，但你不要因此失控，開始加練很多你想練的輔助動作。永遠記住：效率第一。

#原文如下
The absolute floor of volume for a novice athlete is 750 total exercise repetitions per month, and the ceiling for the elite athlete is 1,600 total reps. During our time in the former Soviet Republics, we witnessed athletes performing even higher monthly training volumes. However, as we found later, that was often with the benefit of performance-enhancing substances that allowed for more rapid recovery.

In a single cycle, the total number of repetitions pertains to all exercises performed in the key movements. This means 750 total repetitions are spread between the different exercises among the range of training intensities we want to emphasize.

On the surface, these can seem like small numbers when we consider they may be spread out over 12 to 16 training sessions. That 750-rep total is really more like the basement rather than the floor of total volume—any less than 750 will not budge the needle on gains. That does not mean advanced or elite-level athletes will not have cycles that dip below 1,000 reps. These ranges should be more prescriptive of the ceiling of higher volumes to avoid exceeding. Pushing monthly volume beyond these ranges erodes recovery more rapidly than any other factor.

An elite-level athlete can use a month with a total volume of under 1,000 reps, as will often be the case when returning to training. However, a novice athlete can rarely exceed the 1,000-rep ceiling without risking an injury or a significant overtraining effect.

Many coaches worry their athletes will not do enough work to promote gains in strength and power. They do not want to “waste” a month by aiming too low on total volume and leaving some gains in the tank. That is a natural feeling when adopting this method, and each of us went through the same mental struggle.

Strength coaches in America are not hard-wired to accept less than maximum. However, trust us when we say that without fail, these ranges have proven to be the most effective in generating progress with almost no risk of overtraining.

Fine-tuning where your athletes fall in a volume range takes skill, experience, and consideration of their medical and training history, biological and training age, and gender.
The bloody trail of our mistakes can save you a lot of added stress: When in doubt, it is always better to err on the side of less volume than too much.

The total volume number does not include accessory work or exercises of “local effect.” Those exercises are more targeted muscle strengthening or exercises to support the main movements.

We are mainly concerned about the most physically taxing exercises that demand more of an athlete’s attention to technique—hence, the volume restrictions.

Although the accessory work is not included in the volume calculations, you still cannot go wild, adding as much as you want. Always remember this: efficiency first.
(以上摘錄自原文第132~133)
--
若有發現翻譯不到位或有問題的地方，非常歡迎也希望各界指正！

🌻另一個Zoom會議(第二次貼......有補上一些內容)
繼上次的年報導讀會議後, 讓我們再做另一個會議! 這次很榮幸邀請到一位對估值很有見解的股友前輩來帶大家了解估值(恩, 這次我會是主持人, 不是主講人).
主題: 估值(valuation)分享會(Cat: 這不算基礎的估值會議)
主講人: 小揚(from安泰價值投資)
https://www.facebook.com/antaiinvestment　(此為小揚的粉絲頁)
參與者: 具基本估值能力. 若打算參加者, 請事先跟我(請私訊)提出一個關於估值的case study, 到時候可在會議中分享(最好是以投影片形式呈現, 這樣到時候好跟大家分享). 若有估值的問題, 也可以提出.
Case study可以是美股, 也可以是台股.
時間: 台灣時間07/10 (周六)晚間９點.
預計一個小時(不會像上次那樣冗長了😅): 前30分鐘由小揚做分享, 後30分鐘大家分享估值案例&提問
進行方式: 以Zoom進行(之後會私訊會議資訊給參與者)

🌻Morgan Stanley Mid-year Investor Outlook: A tricky transition

https://www.morganstanley.com/ideas/midyear-2021-global-markets-outlook

🌻在您投資生涯中, 有沒有一些觀念讓您受用很多?
下面這位投資名人的好觀念影響我很深. 他的意思是, 一般投資人, 只要能説出三個買一家公司的理由, 就很夠了. 這也迫使我, 每次在買股票時, 問自己對這家公司的了解有多少. 也會去衡量公司的優點與缺點在哪裡.

"It is vital (重要的) that you know what you own, that if I asked you on the street why you like a certain stock, you can give me three reasons. If you don't know how they make their money, who their key clients are and what they make if, then I will tell you that you are over your head and should not own individual stocks."

全文在此:
Jim Cramer: In Times Like This, Go for the Easy Money
Look at the stocks you own. Can you tell me why you've got them? If you can't answer the following three questions, then have a look at several I like right now.

We've endured the meme stock craziness, with all of its love for heavily shorted stocks. We have watched the collapse of bitcoin to levels viewed as shocking, even if they are still more than double where they were not that long ago. We've dealt with Fed officials making it clear that they are no longer on the side of the bulls or the bears. They are on the side of job growth, but are wary of inflation. We've seen the end of the rush to get vaccines, which means that millions of people are going to get the new COVID variant, because there is no natural immunity to it. We've watched as the hopes for an infrastructure bill have collapsed. We've endured shortages of everything from chips to plastic to imported goods and labor.

And we're still standing, yeah, yeah, yeah.

Yep, we are in one of those halcyon moments, where the masks are off -- even if they shouldn't be -- and Americans are back doing what they do best: consume, spend, go out to eat and then consume and spend some more.

There are times in the stock market where the collective mindset is revealed. This is one of those times: Things are cool, it's not a big moment, there's no real news for a bit, it's the historically strong period and we can reach some conclusions about where we are.

When things are like this, it is important to remember that buyers like to revert to tried-and-true companies that thrive no matter what. These are companies that have an edge and are better at what they do than other companies.

You know that I am a great believer in index funds, that the average person doesn't have the time or the inclination to research individual stocks. It's a difficult barrier. I think you need to make time to read the quarterly report and listen to the conference call, to Google articles and, if possible, get some research about the companies you own. It is vital that you know what you own, that if I asked you on the street why you like a certain stock, you can give me three reasons. If you don't know how they make their money, who their key clients are and what they make if, then I will tell you that you are over your head and should not own individual stocks. I am reminded by this, because, once again, without a mask, I can be recognized and if I am not holding "Nvidia the Second," I can carry on a conversation.

I have had many in the last two weeks and when I have asked this litany of questions, I find myself at a loss as to why almost no one knew what they owned. But they thirsted for individual stocks, because they, like me, think things are better post pandemic. No, that's not a facetious comment. Many, many stocks did better with a stay-at-home economy. A huge number.

So what do I do? I revert to what others do when you are stumped about how to stay in touch with stocks, but want to do less homework. That means buying stocks that are accessible, not stocks like Unity (U) or Snowflake (SNOW) or Twilio (TWLO) or Okta (OKTA) .

I revert to normal businesses people know and I suggest they Google some articles, peruse the conference call, but, above all, like the company's products so you can buy more if it goes down.

Here's some that I have been telling people I like:

First is Ford (F) . I think the Ford lineup is amazing. The electric F-150 series will be incredible. I am eager to get a Maverick for my family, because it is a smaller pickup that will get the job done for the myriad little things I need to do with this farm I bought from that crazy bitcoin foray. I like the competitive edge of the CEO, who says he is going to bury Elon Musk when the Lightning comes out. I even think the Bronco is cool as all get out. Most important, though? I think the chip shortage is ending. My semiconductor friends are telling me the foundries are producing more feature-rich chips and that means Ford can pump out the trucks small business people love and need. Plus, the used car prices at last have plateaued, according to their most important pricing index. Halcyon times.

Second, Costco (COST) : The samples are coming back. Tell me you don't love the samples. You need things in bulk. You want low prices. You want to get all of the things that people don't think of with Costco, like insurance, hearing-aids -- hey, they are a fortune -- jewelry, things around the house. You go and you will buy far more than you first came for. My kind of store.

The kids love this American Eagle Outfitters (AEO) , which we just bought for my charitable trust, which you can follow along by joining the Action Alerts PLUS club. Jay Schottenstein, the CEO, came on "Mad Money" recently and it's clear that his Aerie model has real staying power: 26 consecutive quarters of double digit growth. No flash in the pan, that one. Number one brand in jeans for the 15 to 25 year old group. The best in the mall. How did I know this? I see the credit card bills.

I got up this morning to do my physical therapy. I have been doing it ever since I hurt my back in February. I have this really cool pair of sneakers that fit me perfectly and I love them, but I am fortunate enough to have a vacation house and I am always taking those shoes with me.

So I went on Amazon (AMZN) this morning and lo and behold I saw them for half price. I bought two pairs. Then I went over everything I have bought in the last year and got a bunch of those things. Then I bought a pair of binoculars, because mine were stolen. I paid half price.

Yep, Amazon's universal. I was talking to Alexa, while I was ordering, getting some new music on, asking questions. I saw that despite all of the Sturm und Drang of Amazon being late with things, all the delivery dates were within range. I didn't click on any ads, and I didn't need the speed of Web Services, but the whole thing reminded me about how special the darned company is. I don't care if it's ahead or behind plan for the moment. I would just buy some more when it goes down.

Finally, Apple (AAPL) . I think people who don't own Apple should look what they are holding at this very moment. Yes, right now. Or look at what's in your lap or on the table besides your fork. And then think about the bill you paid last night without knowing it. Think about what you bought in the App store yesterday. Think about what would happen if it would break or get stolen or, left in the Uber (UBER) , or heaven forbid, be dropped into the pool or in the, yes, toilet.

There, that's what you buy in halcyon times. Stocks of companies you know that if they go lower, because things get less halcyon, you are fine with it and buy more. If things go up, believe me, you will participate.

So accept the moment. Don't try for the hard money. Go for the easy kind. That's the best kind.

https://realmoney.thestreet.com/jim-cramer/jim-cramer--15692051

Picture: 牡丹(peony)花開. 恨不得院子裡有一塊地是牡丹園.

哈佛知識分享: 做生意，七大困難選擇! 

七條策略問題 Seven Strategy Questions《第六: How Committed Are Your Employees To Helping Each Other?  同事們之間有幾願意互相幫助?》

從前有三個工人砌磚頭:

第一個，做又36唔做又36， 梗係砌得又慢又冇心機，等收工工。

第二個同佢講，係每嚿磚頭畀多佢兩毫子， 動力梗係加倍! 

第三個同佢講砌磚頭原來係喺起間教堂，等村民可以同神溝通，令人民心靈/世界更加美好。 我估第三個砌曬自己嗰啲之後 ，都可能幫埋側邊個人砌。

以上故事帶出咩理念? 

Business is about making tough choices. 上五集就講咗 Who is your primary customer?  公司股東、顧客、員工，邊個行先? 追數，應追邊三條數? 公司應有邊「十誡」? 同埋如何令員工在適當壓力下發揮創意。

今集我會同你探討第六個策略問題: How Committed Are Your Employees To Helping Each Other?  同事們之間有幾願意互相幫助?

根據哈佛教授 Bob Simons 呢本書 Seven Strategy Questions，上面提及嘅砌磚頭， 就好似公司管理咁， 做又36，唔做又36，肯定唔啱。 無曬推動力! 

想畀員工多啲獎賞鼓勵?

有啲公司， 行 trading strategy: you eat what you kill ... 每個人係 more self-interested， 可能行 commission 佣金制度。

有啲嘅公司，行 solution-based strategy: more teamwork approach， 流程較複雜，可能行 bonus pool 花紅制， 甚至乎有埋 stock options 或 ownership plans. 

無話對與錯，最緊要搞清楚。

好似做地產經紀咁，如果你顧客唔幫襯你，好輕易可以幫襯其他人，即係客戶有 low switching costs, 餐搵餐食餐餐清，公司內部又同一時間可以有好多人以一樣產品跑數，內外競爭較激烈， 做到做到，做唔到就做唔到，好輕易用錢去量度嘅話， 你係行緊個 trading strategy，行佣金制度去鼓勵員工較適合。有得「經紀」兩隻字，基本上都係咁。 以前我係「生意經紀」， 買賣過千單生意仔， 同事們都係行佣金制。 做到 deal 就出佣。

但佣金制亦有利有弊，利嘅就係簡單直接，you eat what you kill. 弊嘅，就係同事們可能會變得較短視、自私、 同埋未必從公司/顧客利益層面著想， 總之就先袋佣金先。 因此你間地產經紀個盤好唔好，佢一定話好。 話唔好，都只係因為有另一個想介紹你買。因此 ....No offense ... 俗語有云: 「經紀靠得住、豬乸會上樹!」 

有啲公司，好似投資銀行咁， 攞咗單 deal 返嚟要成 team 人一齊做 (i.e. 一齊搞上市或收購合併)， 客戶嘅關係係較長久、 成條價值鏈 value chain 比較 複雜，唔係賣咗就算， 好難簡單地用錢去量度邊單一個人做得好或差， 反而同事們嘅 willingness to help each other 係更重要，咁就可能行一個定期嘅花紅 bonus 制度更佳。

因此有啲公司，除了有人工老底 、bonus 以外，又有其他 deferred compensation, stock grants and stock options. 集團、公司、團隊、個人表現各佔15％至35％。

呢本書話，根據MIT 教授Douglas McGregor 1960年 Paper "The Human Side of Enterprise"， 鼓勵人嘅行為有兩種理論 Theory X and Theory Y. 

Theory X 就係話人嘅本性係唔鍾意做嘢㗎，天生惰性。管理就係話要依賴上司叫下屬做乜，需要 extrinsic reward and threat of punishment 畀條蘿蔔或者用條鞭打，外來嘅獎勵或懲罰，人才會有推動力做嘢。即係出佣金或者派花紅。

Theory Y 就係話人可以從工作得到滿足感，intrinsic reward 發自內心嘅回報， 例如個人嘅出色表現，同埋自己對工作嘅認同，咁就是大推動力。

Theory X and Theory Y 並不是 mutually exclusive (互相排斥)的。如果你能夠好好運用 X 同 Y， 同事們從工作得到滿足感 (Y) ，又能夠得到外來回報 (錢 - X)，相信佢哋推動力會更大。

我自己做商舖基金，除咗純粹炒炒賣賣， 都希望為社會做啲正面嘅事。我哋公司嘅 Mission : Creating Shared Value for Shops 為商舖創造共享價值。即係即使我們買入間舖1000萬，希望沽出2000萬以外， 我都更希望投資者、租客、同事們、公司同個社會都賺到錢， 個雪球才會越滾越大。自己袋晒無意思。

Theory Y - 同事們都先要 buy in 以上信念， Take Pride in the Purpose, 工作才有更大滿足感及推動力。

但只係 Theory Y 嘅 Intrinsic Reward 唔夠，要配合 Theory X 啲 Extrinsic Reward, 例如升職、加薪、出佣、出花紅，才會推動力更大。 

因此我自己公司，獎罰都要好分明。我每季每半年都會出exactly 三成嘅商舖基金管理費收入，放落個 bonus pool，以花紅形式派發畀同事們。有派息就派，咁同事們先同投資者利益一致。但唔係分餅仔，係參考每個同事表現嘅 scorecard， 即係對公司嘅 value chain 貢獻程度: 集資、入貨、執靚間舖、招租、出貨、售後服務，按個人表現同團隊合作性分花紅。 My favorite song ... 大家坐埋同一條船，大家水漲船高。

你呢? 你嘅 Theory X and Theory Y 又點啦? 好似一開頭個故事咁，點令同事們更有動力砌磚仔同互相幫忙呢? 

有興趣聽多啲，就來我六月份最後兩場星期六嘅早餐會啦! 下一集，最後一集，同你分享下，What Strategic Uncertainties Keep You Awake At Night? 公司有冇變數令你夜晚瞓唔著呢? 

。。。。。

五／六月份早餐分享會 Topic: The Seven Strategy Questions by Harvard Professor Robert Simons 

哈佛分享: 七條做生意策略問題

2012至2014間，我連續三年在哈佛上了 Robert Simons 的堂，畢生受用。我自己成間商舖基金公司都是建基於這本書。

有興趣 sign up la ? 每次限四位 (包括我)。 人多傾唔到計。

5月1日或8日或15日或22日或29日或6月5日或12日，星期六早上9時開始，約三小時。地點中環。

對象: 管理層/生意經營者/創業者，連我限4位。

有興趣參加的話，請 whatsapp 你的名片給 Suki (我助手) (+852) 5566 1335。

大家交流做生意最重要的幾條問題。

我唔係靠呢行搵食，免費，我請食早餐 ? Be friends ..... 有機會到時見你。李根興 Edwin

www.edwinlee.com.hk

聯絡李根興 whatsapp (+852) 90361143

。。。。。。。。。。

購買李根興的【李根興的生意哲學】(最新2020年6月出版 - 定價$198)，或【買舖 要買得 PRO】(定價$198)，連親筆簽名，可 whatsapp Suki (+852) 5566 1335。各大書局也有售。

Luxxury Godbage by JUST IN XX 2021春夏男女裝
「我從小就不是玩芭比長大的，也不是睡在布堆裡面。
嚴格來說，哥哥穿不下的衣服，就是我的新衣，
對我來說，這世上沒有廢棄物，只有你的不懂如何創作。」
— 設計師周裕穎

品牌支線舊衣回收改造系列，可能之前的系列都是牛仔布跟運動服的改造，所以這一季故意避開這類款式的設計，設計師在模特兒的挑選與款式設計技法上，刻意展現多元化類型的表現，整體仍保有自己的一貫風格手法，整個系列偏向男性&中性風格，女性裙裝幾乎沒有。舊衣改造很多人做，舊衣改造又要有符合穿衣者個人特色的"訂製感 "，把"沒有什麼新東西”，變成”什麼都是新東西"，這個難度又高了一階，做到了每樣單品都有讓人覺得有意思的設計，應該是因為有這樣的自信，最後大方讓觀眾近距離的看服裝上所有的細節。

服裝秀完整影片：https://youtu.be/WS2OlVvzGiQ



Licence:

You’re free to use this song in any of your videos, but you must include the following in your video description (Copy & Paste):

Song: X6zt - By My Side (feat. Nathan Brumley)
Music provided by Vlog No Copyright Music.
Video Link: https://youtu.be/tqq2V61YveE

Song: Jimmy Hardwind - Submarine (ft. Mike Archangelo & CORii)
Music provided by Vlog No Copyright Music.
Video Link: https://youtu.be/-1Uif_rEBSc

Timothy Snyder呢本On Tyranny（中譯暴政）係其中一本我不斷推介嘅書，全書只有20個章節非常快就可以睇完。應該有好多人都唔鐘意睇書又或者俾好多藉口自己唔睇LOL 所以今次呢條片就好似由我讀你聽咁，20分鐘俾我好快咁講返呢本書嘅重點。當然啦最好梗係睇返原著我亦唔係講得好好，希望呢條片可以俾大家做個引子。

片入面嘅每個章節都配以中文譯本嘅章名，我知道有啲睇落意思唔通，而我睇過幾版中譯都發現好多文句都非常唔通順。建議大家可以的話都揀英文版嚟睇，呢本係非常易睇嘅英文書，加上字好少大家唔洗擔心睇唔明或者要睇好耐。

Book Depository Affiliate Link:
https://bit.ly/2UVGg2Y
By shopping with the affiliate link, you are supporting this channel at no cost on your side.

www.savonnez.co
www.instagram.com/savonnez