關於 at your side意思 ，我們在網路上蒐集到這些相關的討論、資訊與評價

🌻另一個Zoom會議(第二次貼......有補上一些內容)
繼上次的年報導讀會議後, 讓我們再做另一個會議! 這次很榮幸邀請到一位對估值很有見解的股友前輩來帶大家了解估值(恩, 這次我會是主持人, 不是主講人).
主題: 估值(valuation)分享會(Cat: 這不算基礎的估值會議)
主講人: 小揚(from安泰價值投資)
https://www.facebook.com/antaiinvestment　(此為小揚的粉絲頁)
參與者: 具基本估值能力. 若打算參加者, 請事先跟我(請私訊)提出一個關於估值的case study, 到時候可在會議中分享(最好是以投影片形式呈現, 這樣到時候好跟大家分享). 若有估值的問題, 也可以提出.
Case study可以是美股, 也可以是台股.
時間: 台灣時間07/10 (周六)晚間９點.
預計一個小時(不會像上次那樣冗長了😅): 前30分鐘由小揚做分享, 後30分鐘大家分享估值案例&提問
進行方式: 以Zoom進行(之後會私訊會議資訊給參與者)

🌻Morgan Stanley Mid-year Investor Outlook: A tricky transition

https://www.morganstanley.com/ideas/midyear-2021-global-markets-outlook

🌻在您投資生涯中, 有沒有一些觀念讓您受用很多?
下面這位投資名人的好觀念影響我很深. 他的意思是, 一般投資人, 只要能説出三個買一家公司的理由, 就很夠了. 這也迫使我, 每次在買股票時, 問自己對這家公司的了解有多少. 也會去衡量公司的優點與缺點在哪裡.

"It is vital (重要的) that you know what you own, that if I asked you on the street why you like a certain stock, you can give me three reasons. If you don't know how they make their money, who their key clients are and what they make if, then I will tell you that you are over your head and should not own individual stocks."

全文在此:
Jim Cramer: In Times Like This, Go for the Easy Money
Look at the stocks you own. Can you tell me why you've got them? If you can't answer the following three questions, then have a look at several I like right now.

We've endured the meme stock craziness, with all of its love for heavily shorted stocks. We have watched the collapse of bitcoin to levels viewed as shocking, even if they are still more than double where they were not that long ago. We've dealt with Fed officials making it clear that they are no longer on the side of the bulls or the bears. They are on the side of job growth, but are wary of inflation. We've seen the end of the rush to get vaccines, which means that millions of people are going to get the new COVID variant, because there is no natural immunity to it. We've watched as the hopes for an infrastructure bill have collapsed. We've endured shortages of everything from chips to plastic to imported goods and labor.

And we're still standing, yeah, yeah, yeah.

Yep, we are in one of those halcyon moments, where the masks are off -- even if they shouldn't be -- and Americans are back doing what they do best: consume, spend, go out to eat and then consume and spend some more.

There are times in the stock market where the collective mindset is revealed. This is one of those times: Things are cool, it's not a big moment, there's no real news for a bit, it's the historically strong period and we can reach some conclusions about where we are.

When things are like this, it is important to remember that buyers like to revert to tried-and-true companies that thrive no matter what. These are companies that have an edge and are better at what they do than other companies.

You know that I am a great believer in index funds, that the average person doesn't have the time or the inclination to research individual stocks. It's a difficult barrier. I think you need to make time to read the quarterly report and listen to the conference call, to Google articles and, if possible, get some research about the companies you own. It is vital that you know what you own, that if I asked you on the street why you like a certain stock, you can give me three reasons. If you don't know how they make their money, who their key clients are and what they make if, then I will tell you that you are over your head and should not own individual stocks. I am reminded by this, because, once again, without a mask, I can be recognized and if I am not holding "Nvidia the Second," I can carry on a conversation.

I have had many in the last two weeks and when I have asked this litany of questions, I find myself at a loss as to why almost no one knew what they owned. But they thirsted for individual stocks, because they, like me, think things are better post pandemic. No, that's not a facetious comment. Many, many stocks did better with a stay-at-home economy. A huge number.

So what do I do? I revert to what others do when you are stumped about how to stay in touch with stocks, but want to do less homework. That means buying stocks that are accessible, not stocks like Unity (U) or Snowflake (SNOW) or Twilio (TWLO) or Okta (OKTA) .

I revert to normal businesses people know and I suggest they Google some articles, peruse the conference call, but, above all, like the company's products so you can buy more if it goes down.

Here's some that I have been telling people I like:

First is Ford (F) . I think the Ford lineup is amazing. The electric F-150 series will be incredible. I am eager to get a Maverick for my family, because it is a smaller pickup that will get the job done for the myriad little things I need to do with this farm I bought from that crazy bitcoin foray. I like the competitive edge of the CEO, who says he is going to bury Elon Musk when the Lightning comes out. I even think the Bronco is cool as all get out. Most important, though? I think the chip shortage is ending. My semiconductor friends are telling me the foundries are producing more feature-rich chips and that means Ford can pump out the trucks small business people love and need. Plus, the used car prices at last have plateaued, according to their most important pricing index. Halcyon times.

Second, Costco (COST) : The samples are coming back. Tell me you don't love the samples. You need things in bulk. You want low prices. You want to get all of the things that people don't think of with Costco, like insurance, hearing-aids -- hey, they are a fortune -- jewelry, things around the house. You go and you will buy far more than you first came for. My kind of store.

The kids love this American Eagle Outfitters (AEO) , which we just bought for my charitable trust, which you can follow along by joining the Action Alerts PLUS club. Jay Schottenstein, the CEO, came on "Mad Money" recently and it's clear that his Aerie model has real staying power: 26 consecutive quarters of double digit growth. No flash in the pan, that one. Number one brand in jeans for the 15 to 25 year old group. The best in the mall. How did I know this? I see the credit card bills.

I got up this morning to do my physical therapy. I have been doing it ever since I hurt my back in February. I have this really cool pair of sneakers that fit me perfectly and I love them, but I am fortunate enough to have a vacation house and I am always taking those shoes with me.

So I went on Amazon (AMZN) this morning and lo and behold I saw them for half price. I bought two pairs. Then I went over everything I have bought in the last year and got a bunch of those things. Then I bought a pair of binoculars, because mine were stolen. I paid half price.

Yep, Amazon's universal. I was talking to Alexa, while I was ordering, getting some new music on, asking questions. I saw that despite all of the Sturm und Drang of Amazon being late with things, all the delivery dates were within range. I didn't click on any ads, and I didn't need the speed of Web Services, but the whole thing reminded me about how special the darned company is. I don't care if it's ahead or behind plan for the moment. I would just buy some more when it goes down.

Finally, Apple (AAPL) . I think people who don't own Apple should look what they are holding at this very moment. Yes, right now. Or look at what's in your lap or on the table besides your fork. And then think about the bill you paid last night without knowing it. Think about what you bought in the App store yesterday. Think about what would happen if it would break or get stolen or, left in the Uber (UBER) , or heaven forbid, be dropped into the pool or in the, yes, toilet.

There, that's what you buy in halcyon times. Stocks of companies you know that if they go lower, because things get less halcyon, you are fine with it and buy more. If things go up, believe me, you will participate.

So accept the moment. Don't try for the hard money. Go for the easy kind. That's the best kind.

https://realmoney.thestreet.com/jim-cramer/jim-cramer--15692051

Picture: 牡丹(peony)花開. 恨不得院子裡有一塊地是牡丹園.

哈佛知識分享: 做生意，七大困難選擇!

七條策略問題 Seven Strategy Questions《第六: How Committed Are Your Employees To Helping Each Other? 同事們之間有幾願意互相幫助?》

從前有三個工人砌磚頭:

第一個，做又36唔做又36， 梗係砌得又慢又冇心機，等收工工。

第二個同佢講，係每嚿磚頭畀多佢兩毫子， 動力梗係加倍!

第三個同佢講砌磚頭原來係喺起間教堂，等村民可以同神溝通，令人民心靈/世界更加美好。 我估第三個砌曬自己嗰啲之後 ，都可能幫埋側邊個人砌。

以上故事帶出咩理念?

Business is about making tough choices. 上五集就講咗 Who is your primary customer? 公司股東、顧客、員工，邊個行先? 追數，應追邊三條數? 公司應有邊「十誡」? 同埋如何令員工在適當壓力下發揮創意。

今集我會同你探討第六個策略問題: How Committed Are Your Employees To Helping Each Other? 同事們之間有幾願意互相幫助?

根據哈佛教授 Bob Simons 呢本書 Seven Strategy Questions，上面提及嘅砌磚頭， 就好似公司管理咁， 做又36，唔做又36，肯定唔啱。 無曬推動力!

想畀員工多啲獎賞鼓勵?

有啲公司， 行 trading strategy: you eat what you kill ... 每個人係 more self-interested， 可能行 commission 佣金制度。

有啲嘅公司，行 solution-based strategy: more teamwork approach， 流程較複雜，可能行 bonus pool 花紅制， 甚至乎有埋 stock options 或 ownership plans.

無話對與錯，最緊要搞清楚。

好似做地產經紀咁，如果你顧客唔幫襯你，好輕易可以幫襯其他人，即係客戶有 low switching costs, 餐搵餐食餐餐清，公司內部又同一時間可以有好多人以一樣產品跑數，內外競爭較激烈， 做到做到，做唔到就做唔到，好輕易用錢去量度嘅話， 你係行緊個 trading strategy，行佣金制度去鼓勵員工較適合。有得「經紀」兩隻字，基本上都係咁。 以前我係「生意經紀」， 買賣過千單生意仔， 同事們都係行佣金制。 做到 deal 就出佣。

但佣金制亦有利有弊，利嘅就係簡單直接，you eat what you kill. 弊嘅，就係同事們可能會變得較短視、自私、 同埋未必從公司/顧客利益層面著想， 總之就先袋佣金先。 因此你間地產經紀個盤好唔好，佢一定話好。 話唔好，都只係因為有另一個想介紹你買。因此 ....No offense ... 俗語有云: 「經紀靠得住、豬乸會上樹!」

有啲公司，好似投資銀行咁， 攞咗單 deal 返嚟要成 team 人一齊做 (i.e. 一齊搞上市或收購合併)， 客戶嘅關係係較長久、 成條價值鏈 value chain 比較 複雜，唔係賣咗就算， 好難簡單地用錢去量度邊單一個人做得好或差， 反而同事們嘅 willingness to help each other 係更重要，咁就可能行一個定期嘅花紅 bonus 制度更佳。

因此有啲公司，除了有人工老底 、bonus 以外，又有其他 deferred compensation, stock grants and stock options. 集團、公司、團隊、個人表現各佔15％至35％。

呢本書話，根據MIT 教授Douglas McGregor 1960年 Paper "The Human Side of Enterprise"， 鼓勵人嘅行為有兩種理論 Theory X and Theory Y.

Theory X 就係話人嘅本性係唔鍾意做嘢㗎，天生惰性。管理就係話要依賴上司叫下屬做乜，需要 extrinsic reward and threat of punishment 畀條蘿蔔或者用條鞭打，外來嘅獎勵或懲罰，人才會有推動力做嘢。即係出佣金或者派花紅。

Theory Y 就係話人可以從工作得到滿足感，intrinsic reward 發自內心嘅回報， 例如個人嘅出色表現，同埋自己對工作嘅認同，咁就是大推動力。

Theory X and Theory Y 並不是 mutually exclusive (互相排斥)的。如果你能夠好好運用 X 同 Y， 同事們從工作得到滿足感 (Y) ，又能夠得到外來回報 (錢 - X)，相信佢哋推動力會更大。

我自己做商舖基金，除咗純粹炒炒賣賣， 都希望為社會做啲正面嘅事。我哋公司嘅 Mission : Creating Shared Value for Shops 為商舖創造共享價值。即係即使我們買入間舖1000萬，希望沽出2000萬以外， 我都更希望投資者、租客、同事們、公司同個社會都賺到錢， 個雪球才會越滾越大。自己袋晒無意思。

Theory Y - 同事們都先要 buy in 以上信念， Take Pride in the Purpose, 工作才有更大滿足感及推動力。

但只係 Theory Y 嘅 Intrinsic Reward 唔夠，要配合 Theory X 啲 Extrinsic Reward, 例如升職、加薪、出佣、出花紅，才會推動力更大。

因此我自己公司，獎罰都要好分明。我每季每半年都會出exactly 三成嘅商舖基金管理費收入，放落個 bonus pool，以花紅形式派發畀同事們。有派息就派，咁同事們先同投資者利益一致。但唔係分餅仔，係參考每個同事表現嘅 scorecard， 即係對公司嘅 value chain 貢獻程度: 集資、入貨、執靚間舖、招租、出貨、售後服務，按個人表現同團隊合作性分花紅。 My favorite song ... 大家坐埋同一條船，大家水漲船高。

你呢? 你嘅 Theory X and Theory Y 又點啦? 好似一開頭個故事咁，點令同事們更有動力砌磚仔同互相幫忙呢?

有興趣聽多啲，就來我六月份最後兩場星期六嘅早餐會啦! 下一集，最後一集，同你分享下，What Strategic Uncertainties Keep You Awake At Night? 公司有冇變數令你夜晚瞓唔著呢?

。。。。。

五／六月份早餐分享會 Topic: The Seven Strategy Questions by Harvard Professor Robert Simons

哈佛分享: 七條做生意策略問題

2012至2014間，我連續三年在哈佛上了 Robert Simons 的堂，畢生受用。我自己成間商舖基金公司都是建基於這本書。

有興趣 sign up la 😃 每次限四位 (包括我)。 人多傾唔到計。

5月1日或8日或15日或22日或29日或6月5日或12日，星期六早上9時開始，約三小時。地點中環。

對象: 管理層/生意經營者/創業者，連我限4位。

有興趣參加的話，請 whatsapp 你的名片給 Suki (我助手) (+852) 5566 1335。

大家交流做生意最重要的幾條問題。

我唔係靠呢行搵食，免費，我請食早餐 😉 Be friends ..... 有機會到時見你。李根興 Edwin

www.edwinlee.com.hk

聯絡李根興 whatsapp (+852) 90361143

。。。。。。。。。。

購買李根興的【李根興的生意哲學】(最新2020年6月出版 - 定價$198)，或【買舖 要買得 PRO】(定價$198)，連親筆簽名，可 whatsapp Suki (+852) 5566 1335。各大書局也有售。

哈佛知識分享: 做生意，七大困難選擇!

七條策略問題 Seven Strategy Questions《第六: How Committed Are Your Employees To Helping Each Other? 同事們之間有幾願意互相幫助?》

從前有三個工人砌磚頭:

第一個，做又36唔做又36， 梗係砌得又慢又冇心機，等收工工。

第二個同佢講，係每嚿磚頭畀多佢兩毫子， 動力梗係加倍!

第三個同佢講砌磚頭原來係喺起間教堂，等村民可以同神溝通，令人民心靈/世界更加美好。 我估第三個砌曬自己嗰啲之後 ，都可能幫埋側邊個人砌。

以上故事帶出咩理念?

Business is about making tough choices. 上五集就講咗 Who is your primary customer? 公司股東、顧客、員工，邊個行先? 追數，應追邊三條數? 公司應有邊「十誡」? 同埋如何令員工在適當壓力下發揮創意。

今集我會同你探討第六個策略問題: How Committed Are Your Employees To Helping Each Other? 同事們之間有幾願意互相幫助?

根據哈佛教授 Bob Simons 呢本書 Seven Strategy Questions，上面提及嘅砌磚頭， 就好似公司管理咁， 做又36，唔做又36，肯定唔啱。 無曬推動力!

想畀員工多啲獎賞鼓勵?

有啲公司， 行 trading strategy: you eat what you kill ... 每個人係 more self-interested， 可能行 commission 佣金制度。

有啲嘅公司，行 solution-based strategy: more teamwork approach， 流程較複雜，可能行 bonus pool 花紅制， 甚至乎有埋 stock options 或 ownership plans.

無話對與錯，最緊要搞清楚。

好似做地產經紀咁，如果你顧客唔幫襯你，好輕易可以幫襯其他人，即係客戶有 low switching costs, 餐搵餐食餐餐清，公司內部又同一時間可以有好多人以一樣產品跑數，內外競爭較激烈， 做到做到，做唔到就做唔到，好輕易用錢去量度嘅話， 你係行緊個 trading strategy，行佣金制度去鼓勵員工較適合。有得「經紀」兩隻字，基本上都係咁。 以前我係「生意經紀」， 買賣過千單生意仔， 同事們都係行佣金制。 做到 deal 就出佣。

但佣金制亦有利有弊，利嘅就係簡單直接，you eat what you kill. 弊嘅，就係同事們可能會變得較短視、自私、 同埋未必從公司/顧客利益層面著想， 總之就先袋佣金先。 因此你間地產經紀個盤好唔好，佢一定話好。 話唔好，都只係因為有另一個想介紹你買。因此 ....No offense ... 俗語有云: 「經紀靠得住、豬乸會上樹!」

有啲公司，好似投資銀行咁， 攞咗單 deal 返嚟要成 team 人一齊做 (i.e. 一齊搞上市或收購合併)， 客戶嘅關係係較長久、 成條價值鏈 value chain 比較 複雜，唔係賣咗就算， 好難簡單地用錢去量度邊單一個人做得好或差， 反而同事們嘅 willingness to help each other 係更重要，咁就可能行一個定期嘅花紅 bonus 制度更佳。

因此有啲公司，除了有人工老底 、bonus 以外，又有其他 deferred compensation, stock grants and stock options. 集團、公司、團隊、個人表現各佔15％至35％。

呢本書話，根據MIT 教授Douglas McGregor 1960年 Paper "The Human Side of Enterprise"， 鼓勵人嘅行為有兩種理論 Theory X and Theory Y.

Theory X 就係話人嘅本性係唔鍾意做嘢㗎，天生惰性。管理就係話要依賴上司叫下屬做乜，需要 extrinsic reward and threat of punishment 畀條蘿蔔或者用條鞭打，外來嘅獎勵或懲罰，人才會有推動力做嘢。即係出佣金或者派花紅。

Theory Y 就係話人可以從工作得到滿足感，intrinsic reward 發自內心嘅回報， 例如個人嘅出色表現，同埋自己對工作嘅認同，咁就是大推動力。

Theory X and Theory Y 並不是 mutually exclusive (互相排斥)的。如果你能夠好好運用 X 同 Y， 同事們從工作得到滿足感 (Y) ，又能夠得到外來回報 (錢 - X)，相信佢哋推動力會更大。

我自己做商舖基金，除咗純粹炒炒賣賣， 都希望為社會做啲正面嘅事。我哋公司嘅 Mission : Creating Shared Value for Shops 為商舖創造共享價值。即係即使我們買入間舖1000萬，希望沽出2000萬以外， 我都更希望投資者、租客、同事們、公司同個社會都賺到錢， 個雪球才會越滾越大。自己袋晒無意思。

Theory Y - 同事們都先要 buy in 以上信念， Take Pride in the Purpose, 工作才有更大滿足感及推動力。

但只係 Theory Y 嘅 Intrinsic Reward 唔夠，要配合 Theory X 啲 Extrinsic Reward, 例如升職、加薪、出佣、出花紅，才會推動力更大。

因此我自己公司，獎罰都要好分明。我每季每半年都會出exactly 三成嘅商舖基金管理費收入，放落個 bonus pool，以花紅形式派發畀同事們。有派息就派，咁同事們先同投資者利益一致。但唔係分餅仔，係參考每個同事表現嘅 scorecard， 即係對公司嘅 value chain 貢獻程度: 集資、入貨、執靚間舖、招租、出貨、售後服務，按個人表現同團隊合作性分花紅。 My favorite song ... 大家坐埋同一條船，大家水漲船高。

你呢? 你嘅 Theory X and Theory Y 又點啦? 好似一開頭個故事咁，點令同事們更有動力砌磚仔同互相幫忙呢?

有興趣聽多啲，就來我六月份最後兩場星期六嘅早餐會啦! 下一集，最後一集，同你分享下，What Strategic Uncertainties Keep You Awake At Night? 公司有冇變數令你夜晚瞓唔著呢?

。。。。。

五／六月份早餐分享會 Topic: The Seven Strategy Questions by Harvard Professor Robert Simons

哈佛分享: 七條做生意策略問題

2012至2014間，我連續三年在哈佛上了 Robert Simons 的堂，畢生受用。我自己成間商舖基金公司都是建基於這本書。

有興趣 sign up la 😃 每次限四位 (包括我)。 人多傾唔到計。

5月1日或8日或15日或22日或29日或6月5日或12日，星期六早上9時開始，約三小時。地點中環。

對象: 管理層/生意經營者/創業者，連我限4位。

有興趣參加的話，請 whatsapp 你的名片給 Suki (我助手) (+852) 5566 1335。

大家交流做生意最重要的幾條問題。

我唔係靠呢行搵食，免費，我請食早餐 😉 Be friends ..... 有機會到時見你。李根興 Edwin

www.edwinlee.com.hk

聯絡李根興 whatsapp (+852) 90361143

。。。。。。。。。。

購買李根興的【李根興的生意哲學】(最新2020年6月出版 - 定價$198)，或【買舖 要買得 PRO】(定價$198)，連親筆簽名，可 whatsapp Suki (+852) 5566 1335。各大書局也有售。

哈佛知識分享: 做生意，七大困難選擇! 

七條策略問題 Seven Strategy Questions《第六: How Committed Are Your Employees To Helping Each Other?  同事們之間有幾願意互相幫助?》

從前有三個工人砌磚頭:

第一個，做又36唔做又36， 梗係砌得又慢又冇心機，等收工工。

第二個同佢講，係每嚿磚頭畀多佢兩毫子， 動力梗係加倍! 

第三個同佢講砌磚頭原來係喺起間教堂，等村民可以同神溝通，令人民心靈/世界更加美好。 我估第三個砌曬自己嗰啲之後 ，都可能幫埋側邊個人砌。

以上故事帶出咩理念? 

Business is about making tough choices. 上五集就講咗 Who is your primary customer?  公司股東、顧客、員工，邊個行先? 追數，應追邊三條數? 公司應有邊「十誡」? 同埋如何令員工在適當壓力下發揮創意。

今集我會同你探討第六個策略問題: How Committed Are Your Employees To Helping Each Other?  同事們之間有幾願意互相幫助?

根據哈佛教授 Bob Simons 呢本書 Seven Strategy Questions，上面提及嘅砌磚頭， 就好似公司管理咁， 做又36，唔做又36，肯定唔啱。 無曬推動力! 

想畀員工多啲獎賞鼓勵?

有啲公司， 行 trading strategy: you eat what you kill ... 每個人係 more self-interested， 可能行 commission 佣金制度。

有啲嘅公司，行 solution-based strategy: more teamwork approach， 流程較複雜，可能行 bonus pool 花紅制， 甚至乎有埋 stock options 或 ownership plans. 

無話對與錯，最緊要搞清楚。

好似做地產經紀咁，如果你顧客唔幫襯你，好輕易可以幫襯其他人，即係客戶有 low switching costs, 餐搵餐食餐餐清，公司內部又同一時間可以有好多人以一樣產品跑數，內外競爭較激烈， 做到做到，做唔到就做唔到，好輕易用錢去量度嘅話， 你係行緊個 trading strategy，行佣金制度去鼓勵員工較適合。有得「經紀」兩隻字，基本上都係咁。 以前我係「生意經紀」， 買賣過千單生意仔， 同事們都係行佣金制。 做到 deal 就出佣。

但佣金制亦有利有弊，利嘅就係簡單直接，you eat what you kill. 弊嘅，就係同事們可能會變得較短視、自私、 同埋未必從公司/顧客利益層面著想， 總之就先袋佣金先。 因此你間地產經紀個盤好唔好，佢一定話好。 話唔好，都只係因為有另一個想介紹你買。因此 ....No offense ... 俗語有云: 「經紀靠得住、豬乸會上樹!」 

有啲公司，好似投資銀行咁， 攞咗單 deal 返嚟要成 team 人一齊做 (i.e. 一齊搞上市或收購合併)， 客戶嘅關係係較長久、 成條價值鏈 value chain 比較 複雜，唔係賣咗就算， 好難簡單地用錢去量度邊單一個人做得好或差， 反而同事們嘅 willingness to help each other 係更重要，咁就可能行一個定期嘅花紅 bonus 制度更佳。

因此有啲公司，除了有人工老底 、bonus 以外，又有其他 deferred compensation, stock grants and stock options. 集團、公司、團隊、個人表現各佔15％至35％。

呢本書話，根據MIT 教授Douglas McGregor 1960年 Paper "The Human Side of Enterprise"， 鼓勵人嘅行為有兩種理論 Theory X and Theory Y. 

Theory X 就係話人嘅本性係唔鍾意做嘢㗎，天生惰性。管理就係話要依賴上司叫下屬做乜，需要 extrinsic reward and threat of punishment 畀條蘿蔔或者用條鞭打，外來嘅獎勵或懲罰，人才會有推動力做嘢。即係出佣金或者派花紅。

Theory Y 就係話人可以從工作得到滿足感，intrinsic reward 發自內心嘅回報， 例如個人嘅出色表現，同埋自己對工作嘅認同，咁就是大推動力。

Theory X and Theory Y 並不是 mutually exclusive (互相排斥)的。如果你能夠好好運用 X 同 Y， 同事們從工作得到滿足感 (Y) ，又能夠得到外來回報 (錢 - X)，相信佢哋推動力會更大。

我自己做商舖基金，除咗純粹炒炒賣賣， 都希望為社會做啲正面嘅事。我哋公司嘅 Mission : Creating Shared Value for Shops 為商舖創造共享價值。即係即使我們買入間舖1000萬，希望沽出2000萬以外， 我都更希望投資者、租客、同事們、公司同個社會都賺到錢， 個雪球才會越滾越大。自己袋晒無意思。

Theory Y - 同事們都先要 buy in 以上信念， Take Pride in the Purpose, 工作才有更大滿足感及推動力。

但只係 Theory Y 嘅 Intrinsic Reward 唔夠，要配合 Theory X 啲 Extrinsic Reward, 例如升職、加薪、出佣、出花紅，才會推動力更大。 

因此我自己公司，獎罰都要好分明。我每季每半年都會出exactly 三成嘅商舖基金管理費收入，放落個 bonus pool，以花紅形式派發畀同事們。有派息就派，咁同事們先同投資者利益一致。但唔係分餅仔，係參考每個同事表現嘅 scorecard， 即係對公司嘅 value chain 貢獻程度: 集資、入貨、執靚間舖、招租、出貨、售後服務，按個人表現同團隊合作性分花紅。 My favorite song ... 大家坐埋同一條船，大家水漲船高。

你呢? 你嘅 Theory X and Theory Y 又點啦? 好似一開頭個故事咁，點令同事們更有動力砌磚仔同互相幫忙呢? 

有興趣聽多啲，就來我六月份最後兩場星期六嘅早餐會啦! 下一集，最後一集，同你分享下，What Strategic Uncertainties Keep You Awake At Night? 公司有冇變數令你夜晚瞓唔著呢? 

。。。。。

五／六月份早餐分享會 Topic: The Seven Strategy Questions by Harvard Professor Robert Simons 

哈佛分享: 七條做生意策略問題

2012至2014間，我連續三年在哈佛上了 Robert Simons 的堂，畢生受用。我自己成間商舖基金公司都是建基於這本書。

有興趣 sign up la ? 每次限四位 (包括我)。 人多傾唔到計。

5月1日或8日或15日或22日或29日或6月5日或12日，星期六早上9時開始，約三小時。地點中環。

對象: 管理層/生意經營者/創業者，連我限4位。

有興趣參加的話，請 whatsapp 你的名片給 Suki (我助手) (+852) 5566 1335。

大家交流做生意最重要的幾條問題。

我唔係靠呢行搵食，免費，我請食早餐 ? Be friends ..... 有機會到時見你。李根興 Edwin

www.edwinlee.com.hk

聯絡李根興 whatsapp (+852) 90361143

。。。。。。。。。。

購買李根興的【李根興的生意哲學】(最新2020年6月出版 - 定價$198)，或【買舖 要買得 PRO】(定價$198)，連親筆簽名，可 whatsapp Suki (+852) 5566 1335。各大書局也有售。

Timothy Snyder呢本On Tyranny（中譯暴政）係其中一本我不斷推介嘅書，全書只有20個章節非常快就可以睇完。應該有好多人都唔鐘意睇書又或者俾好多藉口自己唔睇LOL 所以今次呢條片就好似由我讀你聽咁，20分鐘俾我好快咁講返呢本書嘅重點。當然啦最好梗係睇返原著我亦唔係講得好好，希望呢條片可以俾大家做個引子。

片入面嘅每個章節都配以中文譯本嘅章名，我知道有啲睇落意思唔通，而我睇過幾版中譯都發現好多文句都非常唔通順。建議大家可以的話都揀英文版嚟睇，呢本係非常易睇嘅英文書，加上字好少大家唔洗擔心睇唔明或者要睇好耐。

Book Depository Affiliate Link:
https://bit.ly/2UVGg2Y
By shopping with the affiliate link, you are supporting this channel at no cost on your side.

www.savonnez.co
www.instagram.com/savonnez

上集講完慢煮嘅缺點之後，我哋今集講下慢煮嘅屈機之處。會涉及約8分鐘嘅science lecture, 無興趣或者唔想聽請留意時間跳過。呢件肉嘅完成程度係香港人最接受嘅做法，而且會比焗爐焗出來更香口，更滑，更多汁。可以講係無得輸。
會唔會返唔到轉頭就見仁見智，希望大家明白更多慢煮究竟係發生緊啲咩事，了解之後將佢發揚光大。

補充: 肉係有碳嘅成份係amino acid 入面個component,，不過唔屬於碳水化合物，唔好意思！?

**教學 power point由 1:58 - 9:19 敬請注意 **
內容只代表本台立場，不喜勿插。

We have explained that down side of sous vide from the previous video, so let's talk about the Invincible side of sous vide cooking. I've made a 8 mins science lecture in this video and you are free to skip it. This sirloin is perfectly done and can be done at home. Includes everything like juiciness, tenderness, and of course, the ultimate flavour of the beef itself. Doubt any traditional way can beat it. Please share it around and extend this with your own knowledge so the sous vide cooking can be ubiquitous.

**The science will be from 1:58 to 9:19** and the content only represents my views and no obligation involves with any other channels on youtube.

#慢煮 #牛扒 #牛排