The power of an open mind and a blank sheet of paper (一個開放的心胸與一張空白紙的力量) -- Marc Benioff, Salesforce創辦人
全球最大CRM (客戶關係管理系統)Salesforce 創辦人Marc Benioff 自傳以及管理哲學 (話說,一直找不到他們公司的中文名字,應該要翻譯成“業力”嗎?😂),我選這本書是因為一般B2B 公司能成功打響品牌,比起消費性產品,有一定的難度,希望從這個全球成長最快的企業型軟體公司借鏡。
整本書的雙關語在於他的副標題 "The power of business as the greatest platform for change" (企業的力量是改變世界最好的平台),巧妙的雙關語,帶到 Salesforce的平台商務模式,也說出他認為現代的企業不該只是創造就業機會以及為投資人賺錢,而是有責任為社會公義發聲。
裡面有稍微講到他成長的故事,以及創業的契機與初衷。身為創辦人的故事免不了要分享一些特殊(辛苦)或是失敗的經歷。整體來說我覺得他提到的所謂失敗經歷,描述起來好像沒有講到真的太血淚感。但其中一個經歷我倒覺得他還蠻誠懇的分享,就是在2016年有一陣子美國社會中的 Black Lives Matter 運動中(BLM, 黑人的命也是命),他在推特上表示支持。但沒有多久她和推特的執行長都被踢爆,自己的公司所僱用的員工不到2 %是黑人,被說是一種虛偽和矯情。老實說因著網路文化,這類事情越來越常發生,但至少他願意承認自己不自覺的偽善,並且如何道歉和檢討自己公司是否言行一致,還是很值得佩服的。
另外他分享一個在多年打拼後,發現不得不休息時,才認真思考到底自己在乎的是什麼,並且用什麼方式來檢視?在一個完全刻意 “歸零” 的機會,他發現自己心胸頓時開闊,思緒更加清晰,然後開始在一張白紙上面寫下想法。這後來成為他檢視自己的方式 “V2MOM” ,也推廣在公司裡。雖然聽起來是老生常談,可是我還滿常做類似的思考,也很愛白紙一張開始寫字,真的會讓自己想清楚自己到底在乎什麼?有時忙碌或是焦慮,需要的是在安靜中重新對焦。Pick your battles 很重要啊!
Vision- What do you want
願景 -- 你心中所要的是什麼
Values - what's important to you
價值 --哪些事情對你是重要的
Methods - how do you get it
方法聊如何達成你的目的
Obstacles -what is preventing you from being successful
障礙是什麼阻礙了你達成目的
Measures -how do you know you have it
衡量--你要如何知道你做到了?
我一直都認為,所謂”企業存在最重要是極大化投資人利益“,是一個有點可怕的偏執,也有點可惜,因為它的力量還能產生許多不同的正面價值。現在有許多的討論,包括企業社會責任的評量,社會企業永續經營的可能,以及企業對社會議題的態度,這在美國一些大公司當中更加的明顯。從某個角度來說,就算不想發聲,企業需要針對議題表態的壓力會越來越大,如果不想流於表面和偽善,還真的會蠻需要智慧的。這本書講到的團隊文化,不見得是什麼新的概念,但講到企業的社會責任和推動社會改革,的確是發人深省的。
剛剛發現中文版9月30號出版喔!
“開拓者”企業的力量是改變世界最好的平台”
全文與中文版鏈結在部落格中
https://dushuyizhi.net/trailblazer-開拓者/
#trailblazer #marcbenioff #salesforce #開拓者
同時也有69部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過25萬的網紅老頭 OldMan,也在其Youtube影片中提到,哈囉各位大家好,我是老頭 OldMan 今天要分享的實況是《方舟生物對抗賽》 ARK: Survival Evolved 第16集 【哥吉拉】大戰【酷斯拉】 👉DC交流群:https://discord.gg/dJvBvbBuXN 👉成為這個頻道的會員並獲得獎勵:http://bit.ly/3oT...
「battles中文」的推薦目錄:
- 關於battles中文 在 讀書e誌 Facebook 的最佳解答
- 關於battles中文 在 蔡至誠。PG財經筆記Simple Is The Best Facebook 的最佳解答
- 關於battles中文 在 黃之鋒 Joshua Wong Facebook 的精選貼文
- 關於battles中文 在 老頭 OldMan Youtube 的最佳貼文
- 關於battles中文 在 老頭 OldMan Youtube 的最佳解答
- 關於battles中文 在 老頭 OldMan Youtube 的精選貼文
- 關於battles中文 在 【英語維基】 Pick your battle vs pick a fight 選擇你的戰役vs挑釁 的評價
- 關於battles中文 在 Samurai Battles 中文規則嘍~~~也預祝大家新年快樂 的評價
battles中文 在 蔡至誠。PG財經筆記Simple Is The Best Facebook 的最佳解答
1974年9月,距離新公司成立還有一段時間,而柏格尚未決定要如何命名。
因緣際會下,柏格發現自己先前買下的版畫。
這幅版畫,是柏格在1974年夏季,購自一位古董版畫經銷商。
每幅畫,背後都是一個故事。
柏格說自己一向對神秘永恆的大海所著迷,當初版畫商精準地找上門,讓柏格看了一些同時代英國海戰的同類版畫,畫作大多數的時空背景在拿破崙戰爭時期,跟英國軍事戰役、威靈頓公爵率領軍隊凱旋歸來有關的版畫。
而柏格的老闆,摩根先生正是用「威靈頓」的名字,創立他的第一檔共同基金。
這些版畫當中,柏格最喜歡的主題是1798年納爾遜爵士在尼羅河口之戰所乘坐的戰艦—英國戰艦「先鋒號」。
這是英國納爾遜爵士的艦隊。
柏格翻閱《大不列顛1775-1815海戰圖鑑》(Naval Battles of Great Britain 1775-1815)這本圖鑑,閱讀到尼羅河口之戰時,深受感動。
納爾遜爵士的艦隊,在只損失一艘英國巡防艦的情況下,幾乎擊沉法國的每一艘戰艦,創造至今似乎是歷史上最徹底的海戰勝利,完結了拿破崙征服世界的美夢。
納爾遜的捷報快傳到英國海軍司令總部,捷報下端「尼羅河口外,英國戰艦先鋒號」的艦名正下方,就是納爾遜爵士的簽名。
柏格沒有絲毫遲疑,當下便決定以「Vanguard」作為即將創立的公司名稱。
https://pgfinnote.com/vanguard-name/
battles中文 在 黃之鋒 Joshua Wong Facebook 的精選貼文
【After Winning Majority in LegCo: Beijing's Crackdown May Trigger International Intervention】
***感謝Hong Kong Columns - Translated,將我早前撰寫『議會過半想像:以「#國際攬炒」反制「臨立會2.0」』長文(https://www.facebook.com/joshuawongchifung/photos/a.313299448762570/2887650867994069/)翻譯成英文,鼓勵國際社會關注立會選舉一旦過半的沙盤推演,在最惡劣形勢下的制衡策略。***
中文精簡版本:https://www.facebook.com/joshuawongchifung/photos/a.564294826996363/2888641404561682/
Hongkongers have experienced our revolution for over half a year. They no longer take a consequentialist view to the effectiveness of their movement as they did years ago, or waste time second-guessing the intentions and background of fellow activists. Following the defensive battles at CUHK and PolyU, November’s District Council election saw a great victory of unity. More marvellous is the union between peaceful and “valiant” protesters.
In the process of resisting tyranny, the people have realised that one cannot prioritize one strategy over another. This is also how the common goal of “35+” came into being—the hope that we will win over half of the seats in the Legislative Council (LegCo) this September, such that the political spectrum that represents the majority of Hongkongers is able to gain control of legislative decisions. The political clout of Hongkongers will increase if 35 or more seats are successfully secured on our side. It is certainly one vital step to achieve the five demands within the system.
The possibility of realizing legislative majority
Technically it is not unrealistic to win a majority even under the current undemocratic system. Back in the 2016 LegCo election, we already won 30 seats. In addition to the District Council (First) functional constituency seat that is already in the pocket of the pan-democrats, as long as the candidates in Kowloon East and New Territories West do not start infighting again, we could safely secure 33 seats based on the number of pan-dem votes in 2016.
The other 3 seats required to achieve a majority depend on democrats’ breakthrough among the functional constituencies by dispersing the resources of the Liaison Office. They also count on whether the turnout this September could exceed 71.2% — that of last year’s District Council elections. Some of the factors that could affect the turnout include: will the epidemic persist into the summer? Will there be potential violent repression of protests in the 2 weeks preceding the election? Will Hong Kong-US relations be affected by the downturn of the global economy?
Therefore, the ambition of “35+” is to be prioritised by the resistance as both a means and an end. I have already expressed my support for an intra-party primary at the coordination meeting. In the meantime, it is pleasing to see the ongoing debates reaching a consensus of maximising the seats among geographical constituencies in the upcoming election.
Whilst enthusiastic coordination, we should also assess the post-election landscape and gauge Beijing’s reactions: if we do not reach 35 seats, Hong Kong will be subject to tighter control and more severe repression by China; but if the democratic parties successfully form a majority in LegCo, CCP’s fears of a “constitutional crisis” would become imminent. Hence, the key questions are how the Pan-Democrats should deal with the volatile political situation in Hong Kong and how they are going to meet Beijing’s charge head-on.
Watching out for Beijing’s dismissal of LegCo after reaching majority
To take back control of LegCo such that it faithfully reflects the majority’s principles and needs is the definition of a healthy democracy. Recently, however, DAB’s Tam Yiu-chung has warned that the plan of the Pan-Dems to “usurp power” in the LegCo would only lead to Beijing’s forceful disqualification of certain members or the interpretation of the Basic Law. This proves that winning a majority in LegCo is not only a popular conception but also a realistic challenge that would get on the nerves of Beijing. Could Beijing accept a President James To in LegCo? These unknown variables must be addressed upon achieving a majority.
While there is no telltale sign as to Beijing’s exact strategy, we are already familiar with the way CCP manipulated the Basic Law in the past 4 years. Having experienced three waves of disqualifications in LegCo, twice kicked out of LegCo with my team, and thrice locked up in jail, I have no false hopes of an easy compromise from Beijing: they would not let Pan-Dems control LegCo for half a year and wait (as is the proper procedure) until after having negatived the Budget to dissolve the legislature, and thereby giving them an easy victory in the re-elections. The greater the Pan-Dems threaten Beijing’s rule in Hong Kong, the more likely that it will trigger Beijing’s repression.
Since the disqualification and arrest of lawmakers have already become “normalised”, one can even imagine the police stepping into the LegCo building to force Pan-Dems into voting. Neither is it beyond our imagination to expect the CCP to kick out all 70 lawmakers in a fit of rage and replace them with a provisional LegCo “2.0” [HKCT note: The first was from 25 Jan 1997 to 30 Jun 1998]. To depend on a majority that could lead to a chapter of a “new testament” for One Country, Two Systems is perhaps what many elites long for, but they are overly optimistic:for a ticket to the promised land will not be available at the Chief Executive election campaign a year and a half later.
Admittedly, the Pan-Dems cannot unilaterally initiate “Laam-chaau” [HKCT note: mostly translated into “scorched-earth” mentality or “mutual destruction”; some even translated into “If I burn, you burn with us”]. The most they can do is to force a standstill of the government, and not for long the LegCo will have been eliminated from the equation to make the wheels turn again. It all leaves the plan of “Negativing the motion → Dissolving LegCo → Re-election after re-election → the stepping down of Carrie Lam” merely as overly positive speculation, probably resulting from their overestimate of CCP's capacity for rational calculation. The Pan-Dems must guard their frontlines and recognise what the biggest threat from Hong Kong to China could be. In this case, should LegCo sessions be disrupted or suspended, the Pan-Dems would have to be well prepared to surmount the expected obstacles and prevent the disqualification crisis 4 years ago—a Catch-22 indeed.
Productive tension from global intervention: Using Laam-chaau against the CCP
What aggravates the CCP the most is the potential threat to Hong Kong’s unique status as the one and only “separate customs territory”. Any miscalculation will compromise its role as the Chinese economy’s “white gloves”. Imagine if CCP were to disqualify all 70 elected lawmakers and convene a meeting north of the Shenzhen River to pass a resolution to Hong Kong’s affairs (much like the Provisional Legislative Council “1.0" in 1997), how great will the shock be in a world with an effective Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act? However hard it is to predict the future one thing is certain: With the US presidential election just around the corner, blows to the separation of powers would not be tolerated, and the West would necessarily effect countermeasures against the Hong Kong government.
Beijing has been relying upon Hong Kong to navigate the international community for decades. While clamping down on the political freedom of the cosmopolitan city, Beijing desires to maintain the financial centre’s economic freedom. Hence, we started lobbying for the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act four years ago, and today we are determined to promote “Laam-chaau” on an international scale.
The will of the voters must be reflected in an election. If a “35+” legislature were to be dismissed and replaced, such flagrant violation of democracy would assuredly cause a greater backlash than the infamous extradition bill. Knowing what the reality ahead of us could be, we have to combine our election and international strategies to oppose the placement of a 35+ LegCo with an “Emergency Legislative Council 2.0”, to advance an international “Laam-chaau” to Hong Kong’s status as “separate customs territory”. Only then will we stand a chance to resist the regime and to realise the five demands.
Adjusting our mindset: Overcoming the “constitutional crisis” to reach a resolution
Upon the realization of the “35+” LegCo, it is expected that the CCP will launch a devastating counterattack. The Pan-Dems should not expect LegCo to run normally; neither can the lawmakers realise their governing blueprints they have for Hong Kong. Rather, candidates will be able to compete against one another with visions of a liberated Hong Kong through popular vote. Bringing this point up has nothing to do with undermining the common goal of reaching a majority in LegCo, but rather channels the battle of LegCo to positive use upon the rule of law’s death and a “constitutional crisis” ahead. Knowing that Hongkongers have nothing to fall back on, all Pan-Dems should not miss the only way to the realization of “35+”.
Thus, be they partisans, nonpartisans, incumbent politicians, amateur politicians, or the civil society as a whole – if we stay in the political discourse of 2016 and continue to perpetuate old stereotypes, that is to deal with the divisions on the pan-democratic camp by favouring the most “local” faction; to consider only resource allocation and self-aggrandizement as the purpose of a LegCo campaign; to ignore how potential lawmakers are fitted to what specific roles; to turn a blind eye to the journey of resistance since last summer (extending indefinitely into the future)—They would lead as astray and cost us lose a precious opportunity for change by winning a 35+ majority.
The extent to which the pan-democrats can stay united in light of the political atmosphere since last summer is another problem that our side must to address. Before the watershed moment of 12th June 2019, many democratic delegates were trapped in the mentality of needing to “preserve people’s livelihood”, “be content of what we have accomplished”, and other strategies that favours stability. As the government refuses to heed to the five demands, whether the democrats, especially those in the functional constituencies, have the political will to go all-in is the real difficult question that confronts us in the upcoming LegCo election.
All in all, if “35+” cannot be realised, it is unsurprising to see LegCo being more heavily suppressed in the next 4 years; even if "35+" is achieved, it is questionable whether the pan-democrats are able to weather multiple attacks, verbal or physical, from the regime (judging from its power in the last four years) and utilise the international Laam-chaau strategy against the displacement of LegCo. Adhering to the motto of “we fight on, each in his own way”, I can only hope that Hongkongers in elections, street confrontations and international front can reconcile with each other, so that we may collectively compel the government to yield to our demands in the next six months. It is only by reaching a resolution before a real constitutional crisis that we can combat the institutional violence of the regime and not be devoured by it.
https://hkcolumn.blogspot.com/2020/04/joshua-wong-after-winning-majority-in.html?fbclid=IwAR216gf53pG_j9JOpDfr2GItvjLfrFSekKTPzoEs3-s9KBqvPEwz865P8vw
battles中文 在 老頭 OldMan Youtube 的最佳貼文
哈囉各位大家好,我是老頭 OldMan
今天要分享的實況是《方舟生物對抗賽》
ARK: Survival Evolved 第16集
【哥吉拉】大戰【酷斯拉】
👉DC交流群:https://discord.gg/dJvBvbBuXN
👉成為這個頻道的會員並獲得獎勵:http://bit.ly/3oT7fK6
👉老頭周邊商品:https://bit.ly/2Myvr6C
👉LINE官方帳號【@oldman_0302】👉Instagram【oldman_0302】
👉馬上訂閱YouTube頻道,接收最新影片消息:http://bit.ly/1OnlTWy
🔴方舟 生存進化 所有系列 【播放清單】:http://bit.ly/2bOpMDq
🔴所有遊戲【播放清單】:http://bit.ly/2A0jIDo
👉老頭紀錄檔副頻道:https://bit.ly/2oCMoxy
👉贊助老頭可以獲得專屬頭貼跟貼圖喔:https://bit.ly/2QKh5xU
👉如果你喜歡遊戲,歡迎留言與我交流、分享遊戲資訊
👉如果您是遊戲廠商,歡迎洽談合作
👉聯絡電郵:f0987284469@gmail.com
電腦配備
CPU:intel I9-7940X
(內搭塔扇:日系 Scythe Mugen 5 無限五 CPU風扇散熱器)
主機版:X299 AORUS GAMNG 7 PRO
顯示卡: RTX 技嘉 2080Ti GAMING OC 11G
硬碟: 固態硬碟 EZLINK 2.5吋 256G
固態硬碟 Kingston M2 480G
傳統硬碟 Seagate 2TB 3.5吋
傳統硬碟 WD【黑標】4TB 3.5吋電競硬碟
記憶體:Kingston 金士頓 DDR4 2400 HyperX Fury 16G兩支
機殼:AORUS C300 GLASS(GB-AC300G 機殼)
電源供應器:銀欣650W 金牌/半模
鍵盤:TESORO鐵修羅 剋龍劍Gram RGB機械式鍵盤-紅軸中文黑
滑鼠:羅技 Logitech G300S
麥克風:AT2020USBi 靜電型電容式麥克風
#哥吉拉 #ARK #酷斯拉
battles中文 在 老頭 OldMan Youtube 的最佳解答
哈囉各位大家好,我是老頭 OldMan
今天要分享的實況是《方舟生物對抗賽》
ARK: Survival Evolved 第15集
【哥吉拉】 VS 【X-腕龍】
👉DC交流群:https://discord.gg/dJvBvbBuXN
👉成為這個頻道的會員並獲得獎勵:http://bit.ly/3oT7fK6
👉老頭周邊商品:https://bit.ly/2Myvr6C
👉LINE官方帳號【@oldman_0302】👉Instagram【oldman_0302】
👉馬上訂閱YouTube頻道,接收最新影片消息:http://bit.ly/1OnlTWy
🔴方舟 生存進化 所有系列 【播放清單】:http://bit.ly/2bOpMDq
🔴所有遊戲【播放清單】:http://bit.ly/2A0jIDo
👉老頭紀錄檔副頻道:https://bit.ly/2oCMoxy
👉贊助老頭可以獲得專屬頭貼跟貼圖喔:https://bit.ly/2QKh5xU
👉如果你喜歡遊戲,歡迎留言與我交流、分享遊戲資訊
👉如果您是遊戲廠商,歡迎洽談合作
👉聯絡電郵:f0987284469@gmail.com
電腦配備
CPU:intel I9-7940X
(內搭塔扇:日系 Scythe Mugen 5 無限五 CPU風扇散熱器)
主機版:X299 AORUS GAMNG 7 PRO
顯示卡: RTX 技嘉 2080Ti GAMING OC 11G
硬碟: 固態硬碟 EZLINK 2.5吋 256G
固態硬碟 Kingston M2 480G
傳統硬碟 Seagate 2TB 3.5吋
傳統硬碟 WD【黑標】4TB 3.5吋電競硬碟
記憶體:Kingston 金士頓 DDR4 2400 HyperX Fury 16G兩支
機殼:AORUS C300 GLASS(GB-AC300G 機殼)
電源供應器:銀欣650W 金牌/半模
鍵盤:TESORO鐵修羅 剋龍劍Gram RGB機械式鍵盤-紅軸中文黑
滑鼠:羅技 Logitech G300S
麥克風:AT2020USBi 靜電型電容式麥克風
#哥吉拉
#ARK
#老頭
battles中文 在 老頭 OldMan Youtube 的精選貼文
哈囉各位大家好,我是老頭 OldMan
今天要分享的實況是《方舟生物對抗賽》
ARK: Survival Evolved 第14集
狄氏鱷對抗神秘腕龍!!
👉DC交流群:https://discord.gg/dJvBvbBuXN
👉成為這個頻道的會員並獲得獎勵:http://bit.ly/3oT7fK6
👉老頭周邊商品:https://bit.ly/2Myvr6C
👉LINE官方帳號【@oldman_0302】👉Instagram【oldman_0302】
👉馬上訂閱YouTube頻道,接收最新影片消息:http://bit.ly/1OnlTWy
🔴方舟 生存進化 所有系列 【播放清單】:http://bit.ly/2bOpMDq
🔴所有遊戲【播放清單】:http://bit.ly/2A0jIDo
👉老頭紀錄檔副頻道:https://bit.ly/2oCMoxy
👉贊助老頭可以獲得專屬頭貼跟貼圖喔:https://bit.ly/2QKh5xU
👉如果你喜歡遊戲,歡迎留言與我交流、分享遊戲資訊
👉如果您是遊戲廠商,歡迎洽談合作
👉聯絡電郵:f0987284469@gmail.com
電腦配備
CPU:intel I9-7940X
(內搭塔扇:日系 Scythe Mugen 5 無限五 CPU風扇散熱器)
主機版:X299 AORUS GAMNG 7 PRO
顯示卡: RTX 技嘉 2080Ti GAMING OC 11G
硬碟: 固態硬碟 EZLINK 2.5吋 256G
固態硬碟 Kingston M2 480G
傳統硬碟 Seagate 2TB 3.5吋
傳統硬碟 WD【黑標】4TB 3.5吋電競硬碟
記憶體:Kingston 金士頓 DDR4 2400 HyperX Fury 16G兩支
機殼:AORUS C300 GLASS(GB-AC300G 機殼)
電源供應器:銀欣650W 金牌/半模
鍵盤:TESORO鐵修羅 剋龍劍Gram RGB機械式鍵盤-紅軸中文黑
滑鼠:羅技 Logitech G300S
麥克風:AT2020USBi 靜電型電容式麥克風
#狄氏鱷
#ARK
#老頭
battles中文 在 Samurai Battles 中文規則嘍~~~也預祝大家新年快樂 的美食出口停車場
THERE`s BOARD Game: Samurai Battles (2012) 武士之戰中文規則. Share · 3 Shares. Phil Chen, profile picture. Phil Chen. Andrew Cheng (敲碗. 7 yrs Report. ... <看更多>
battles中文 在 【英語維基】 Pick your battle vs pick a fight 選擇你的戰役vs挑釁 的美食出口停車場
【英語維基】 Pick your battle vs pick a fight 選擇你的戰役vs挑釁 ... 慢速常用英語口語1000句(帶 中文 音頻/繁體、簡體字幕). ... <看更多>