第四集 (一連七集) 哈佛知識分享: What is strategy? How do you create value? 什麼是策略 ? 你如何創造價值?
一開始我講過:
"The first test of a strategy is whether your value proposition is different from your rivals. If you are trying to serve the same customers and meet the same needs and sell at the same relative price, then you don't have a strategy. " by Michael Porter
如果你嘅價值主張係同你嘅競爭對手一樣, 即係話你服務緊同一班顧客, 解決緊同一問題, 收緊差唔多價錢的話, 哈佛教授米高波特就講你係「人做你做」,你「無策略」 。
咁何謂一個好嘅策略 Good Strategy? 教授講要經得起五個 Tests:
A distinctive value proposition 獨特的價值主張
A tailored value chain 度身訂造的企業價值鏈
Trade-offs different from rivals 同競爭對手不同的「取捨」
Fit across value chain 成條企業價值鏈的活動要配合
Continuity over time 持續性、持續性,不能一時一樣
今集先再你講(1) 同 (2)。 (1) 何謂獨特的價值主張? 你先回答以下三條問題,睇下你同競爭對手有乜唔同。
Which customers are you serving? (What end users? What channels?) 你服務緊邊班客? 誰是最終顧客? 什麼渠道接觸他們?
Which needs are you going to meet? (What products、features、services?) 你想滿足他們什麼需求? 什麼產品、特徵 、服務?
What relative price? (Premium or discount?) 相比起競爭對手,你打算賣貴啲或平啲?
"The value proposition is the element of strategy that looks outward at customers, at the demand side of the business. The value chain focuses internally on operations. Strategy is fundamentally integrative, bringing the demand and supply sides together." by Michael Porter
策略入面的「價值主張」 是從由顧客的「需求」角度出發。 「企業價值鏈」反而是由內部的營運流程「供應」出發。 策略的基礎就係把「需求」及「供應」兩者整合在一起。
你要有好嘅策略,你就要第 (2) Have a tailored value chain 有一條度身訂造的企業價值鏈。由入貨、加工、包裝、市場推廣、 銷售 、出貨、至售後服務都要同競爭對手唔同, 都係度身訂做去服務你以上「價值主張」要服務的顧客。
Michael Porter 話做生意常犯嘅錯誤,亦都係最忌嘅就係 "Stuck in the middle" 「卡住喺中間」。即係平又唔係平過人, 靚又唔係靚過人, 服務嗰班客或者佢哋嘅需求又唔係特別嘅過人,咁你就乜唔係,「價值主張」無乜特別,好難突出。咁你可以點?
例如, 如果就咁開間租車公司,你點同業界巨頭 Hertz, Budget, Avis 打呢? 好容易就 "Stuck in the middle", 因此絕大部分嘅租車公司你都唔會識,我亦都唔會提。 但美國有間獨特的租車公司,Zipcar, 佢同一般嘅租車公司好唔同。
Zipcar 唔係好似絕大部分嘅租車公司咁, target 區外客, 到咗某個城市要租車週圍走。佢係 target 平時市區內住,無養車, 但突然間想租車走一轉嘅人仕。佢唔係按「日租」,而係按「時租」, 你想去超級市場買一轉餸都可以租。
Zipcar冇話特定嘅租車中心, 而係啲車周街泊, 透過佢嘅Apps 你就知道架車泊咗係邊度及還車地點。 咁就更加方便同埋近你屋企。公司營運成本都平好多。
Zipcar 的車種經常畀人感覺係較 “Cool" ,比較型仔啲、環保啲。 佢唔會花好多錢大賣電視/戶外廣告,而係喺架車身上面貼住大大個公司 hip logo,變相周街免費流動廣告。
Zipcar 叫自己做 Car Sharing Company, not Car Rental Company。因為唔係個個人都租得,而只係付月費/年費的會員才能夠租。 依家月費每月7元美金或年費70元美金。咁佢就可以每次收費更平出租,但重複地賺你個月費年費。 佢想建立個形象就係 Car Sharing 遠遠環保過自己一個買架、保養、同埋棄置成架車。專攻年輕、活躍、較 "Green“ 的新一代。
Zipcar 仲有好多好多嘅特點講唔晒。總之就係,佢嘅 value proposition 價值主張 (Which Customers? Which Needs? What Relative Price?) 同所有其他租車公司巨頭都唔同, 成條嘅企業價值都係為咗個「價值主張」而去度身訂,同所有競爭對手都好唔同。
記住前幾集我同你講過,what's the right mind-set for competition? 你應該點諗競爭?
盡量得,你應該諗 Not be the the best, but be unique。 唔係要做到最好,而係做到最獨特。Zipcar is unique.
Not be number 1, but earn higher returns. 唔係要做到第一,而係要多啲回報,賺多啲錢! Zipcar 回報最高嘅係不斷重複收嘅月費年費,最穩定。
Not focus on market share, but focus on profits. 唔係要市佔率,係要利潤。Zipcar 賺錢。
Not serve the "best" customer with "best" product, but meet the diverse needs of target customers. 唔係要「最好」嘅產品,畀「最好」嘅客。而係用唔同嘅產品,滿足唔同顧客嘅需求。Zipcar 班客同其他租車公司好唔同。
Not compete by imitation, but compete by innovation. 唔係人做你做,而係要創新! Zipcar 肯定創新。
Not ZERO SUM game, but POSITIVE SUM. 唔係「零和遊戲」、互相廝殺, 而係大家從不同層面創造價值, 可以有好多個贏家。Zipcar 吸引咗一班平時唔係租開車嘅客, 佢做大咗個餅。
Zipcar 就係做到上 "Be Unique“ 嘅表表者。因此短短幾年間就可以係租車業界一支箭咁標上去,2000年係美國波士頓創立, 2013年就俾另一租車業界巨頭 Avis Budget Group 以美金5億收購了。2016年9月 Zipcar 公佈,全球9個國家,500個城市,擁有超過一百萬個會員。 一百萬個付費會員, 即使全部人唔租車,只係收月費年費都幾和味。 呢個就係我成日所講嘅做生意要做「農夫」,唔好做「獵人」,必須要客人係重複性購買, 你塊田先至會越嚟越大。
包括我自己在內,如果我純粹買賣舖, 根本我同其他商舖投資者無分別, 我錢又唔夠佢哋多,經驗又唔夠佢哋老到。 直接對撼,I have no strategy! 但我做「商舖基金」就完全唔同啦。班目標顧客、佢哋嘅需求、我所收嘅價錢,都完全唔同。 大家都係做「舖」,但我成條做「舖」嘅「企業價值鏈」, 由集資、買舖、 整理間舖、搵租客、諗計仔幫佢做多啲生意、至出售間舖、同售後服務, 都係同其他競爭對手唔同。亦都解釋咗點解, 即使社運/肺炎,我哋基金每季集資起碼6000港幣都季季爆額,近年全香港買賣街舖無人多過我哋, 我相信只要我哋專注係我哋條買舖的獨特嘅「企業價值鏈」,未來幾十年香港都唔會有人買賣舖多過我哋。
"Choices in the value proposition that limit what a company will do are essential to strategy because they create the opportunity to tailor activities in a way that best delivers that kind of value." by Michael Porter
「選擇」係重要嘅! 你公司就要選有乜嘢做,同更重要 - 有乜嘢唔做,咁你先至可以更加度身訂造地做好你成條「企業價值鏈」,去為你嘅「價值主張」創造最佳價值。
有興趣一齊研究下點做? 聽多啲 Michael Porter,就來我星期六嘅早餐會啦! 下集我再同你講 (3) Trade-offs different from rivals 同競爭對手,應該有什麼不同的「取捨」?
。。。。。
My hobby 《星期六早餐會》!
九月份早餐會 Topic: Applying "Michael Porter" to your business: How to compete and win!
哈佛分享: 如何應用「米高波特」於你盤生意? 點競爭? 點贏?
講起哈佛策略教授, 無人出名過 Michael Porter. 有幸我2017年在哈佛親身上過他教的課程, 今次早餐會同你分享,希望對你做生意亦有所啟發。
有興趣參加啦 😃 每次限四位 (包括我)。 人多傾唔到計。
9月份,逢星期六早上9時開始,約三小時。地點中環。
對象: 中小企老闆/創業者/公司管理層,連我限4位。
有興趣參加的話,請 whatsapp 你的名片給 Suki (我助手) (+852) 5566 1335。
我唔係靠呢行搵食,免費,我請食早餐 😉 Be friends ..... 有機會到時見你。李根興 Edwin
www.edwinlee.com.hk
www.bwfund.com
聯絡李根興 whatsapp (+852) 90361143
#michael_porter #競爭策略
同時也有8部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過15萬的網紅豐富,也在其Youtube影片中提到,主持人:楊應超 第一季-第5集:美國大選對股市的影響 節目直播時間:週五 14點 本集播出日期:2020.10.09 ⏭ 章節: 00:00 頻道片頭 00:07 開場 00:27 節目片頭 00:45 美國大選對股市的影響 14:50 Q&A:看什麼投資書比較好? 31:28 Q&A:賺錢比存錢...
zero-sum game 在 Facebook 的最佳貼文
第四集 (一連七集) 哈佛知識分享: What is strategy? How do you create value? 什麼是策略 ? 你如何創造價值?
一開始我講過:
"The first test of a strategy is whether your value proposition is different from your rivals. If you are trying to serve the same customers and meet the same needs and sell at the same relative price, then you don't have a strategy. " by Michael Porter
如果你嘅價值主張係同你嘅競爭對手一樣, 即係話你服務緊同一班顧客, 解決緊同一問題, 收緊差唔多價錢的話, 哈佛教授米高波特就講你係「人做你做」,你「無策略」 。
咁何謂一個好嘅策略 Good Strategy? 教授講要經得起五個 Tests:
A distinctive value proposition 獨特的價值主張
A tailored value chain 度身訂造的企業價值鏈
Trade-offs different from rivals 同競爭對手不同的「取捨」
Fit across value chain 成條企業價值鏈的活動要配合
Continuity over time 持續性、持續性,不能一時一樣
今集先再你講(1) 同 (2)。 (1) 何謂獨特的價值主張? 你先回答以下三條問題,睇下你同競爭對手有乜唔同。
Which customers are you serving? (What end users? What channels?) 你服務緊邊班客? 誰是最終顧客? 什麼渠道接觸他們?
Which needs are you going to meet? (What products、features、services?) 你想滿足他們什麼需求? 什麼產品、特徵 、服務?
What relative price? (Premium or discount?) 相比起競爭對手,你打算賣貴啲或平啲?
"The value proposition is the element of strategy that looks outward at customers, at the demand side of the business. The value chain focuses internally on operations. Strategy is fundamentally integrative, bringing the demand and supply sides together." by Michael Porter
策略入面的「價值主張」 是從由顧客的「需求」角度出發。 「企業價值鏈」反而是由內部的營運流程「供應」出發。 策略的基礎就係把「需求」及「供應」兩者整合在一起。
你要有好嘅策略,你就要第 (2) Have a tailored value chain 有一條度身訂造的企業價值鏈。由入貨、加工、包裝、市場推廣、 銷售 、出貨、至售後服務都要同競爭對手唔同, 都係度身訂做去服務你以上「價值主張」要服務的顧客。
Michael Porter 話做生意常犯嘅錯誤,亦都係最忌嘅就係 "Stuck in the middle" 「卡住喺中間」。即係平又唔係平過人, 靚又唔係靚過人, 服務嗰班客或者佢哋嘅需求又唔係特別嘅過人,咁你就乜唔係,「價值主張」無乜特別,好難突出。咁你可以點?
例如, 如果就咁開間租車公司,你點同業界巨頭 Hertz, Budget, Avis 打呢? 好容易就 "Stuck in the middle", 因此絕大部分嘅租車公司你都唔會識,我亦都唔會提。 但美國有間獨特的租車公司,Zipcar, 佢同一般嘅租車公司好唔同。
Zipcar 唔係好似絕大部分嘅租車公司咁, target 區外客, 到咗某個城市要租車週圍走。佢係 target 平時市區內住,無養車, 但突然間想租車走一轉嘅人仕。佢唔係按「日租」,而係按「時租」, 你想去超級市場買一轉餸都可以租。
Zipcar冇話特定嘅租車中心, 而係啲車周街泊, 透過佢嘅Apps 你就知道架車泊咗係邊度及還車地點。 咁就更加方便同埋近你屋企。公司營運成本都平好多。
Zipcar 的車種經常畀人感覺係較 “Cool" ,比較型仔啲、環保啲。 佢唔會花好多錢大賣電視/戶外廣告,而係喺架車身上面貼住大大個公司 hip logo,變相周街免費流動廣告。
Zipcar 叫自己做 Car Sharing Company, not Car Rental Company。因為唔係個個人都租得,而只係付月費/年費的會員才能夠租。 依家月費每月7元美金或年費70元美金。咁佢就可以每次收費更平出租,但重複地賺你個月費年費。 佢想建立個形象就係 Car Sharing 遠遠環保過自己一個買架、保養、同埋棄置成架車。專攻年輕、活躍、較 "Green“ 的新一代。
Zipcar 仲有好多好多嘅特點講唔晒。總之就係,佢嘅 value proposition 價值主張 (Which Customers? Which Needs? What Relative Price?) 同所有其他租車公司巨頭都唔同, 成條嘅企業價值都係為咗個「價值主張」而去度身訂,同所有競爭對手都好唔同。
記住前幾集我同你講過,what's the right mind-set for competition? 你應該點諗競爭?
盡量得,你應該諗 Not be the the best, but be unique。 唔係要做到最好,而係做到最獨特。Zipcar is unique.
Not be number 1, but earn higher returns. 唔係要做到第一,而係要多啲回報,賺多啲錢! Zipcar 回報最高嘅係不斷重複收嘅月費年費,最穩定。
Not focus on market share, but focus on profits. 唔係要市佔率,係要利潤。Zipcar 賺錢。
Not serve the "best" customer with "best" product, but meet the diverse needs of target customers. 唔係要「最好」嘅產品,畀「最好」嘅客。而係用唔同嘅產品,滿足唔同顧客嘅需求。Zipcar 班客同其他租車公司好唔同。
Not compete by imitation, but compete by innovation. 唔係人做你做,而係要創新! Zipcar 肯定創新。
Not ZERO SUM game, but POSITIVE SUM. 唔係「零和遊戲」、互相廝殺, 而係大家從不同層面創造價值, 可以有好多個贏家。Zipcar 吸引咗一班平時唔係租開車嘅客, 佢做大咗個餅。
Zipcar 就係做到上 "Be Unique“ 嘅表表者。因此短短幾年間就可以係租車業界一支箭咁標上去,2000年係美國波士頓創立, 2013年就俾另一租車業界巨頭 Avis Budget Group 以美金5億收購了。2016年9月 Zipcar 公佈,全球9個國家,500個城市,擁有超過一百萬個會員。 一百萬個付費會員, 即使全部人唔租車,只係收月費年費都幾和味。 呢個就係我成日所講嘅做生意要做「農夫」,唔好做「獵人」,必須要客人係重複性購買, 你塊田先至會越嚟越大。
包括我自己在內,如果我純粹買賣舖, 根本我同其他商舖投資者無分別, 我錢又唔夠佢哋多,經驗又唔夠佢哋老到。 直接對撼,I have no strategy! 但我做「商舖基金」就完全唔同啦。班目標顧客、佢哋嘅需求、我所收嘅價錢,都完全唔同。 大家都係做「舖」,但我成條做「舖」嘅「企業價值鏈」, 由集資、買舖、 整理間舖、搵租客、諗計仔幫佢做多啲生意、至出售間舖、同售後服務, 都係同其他競爭對手唔同。亦都解釋咗點解, 即使社運/肺炎,我哋基金每季集資起碼6000港幣都季季爆額,近年全香港買賣街舖無人多過我哋, 我相信只要我哋專注係我哋條買舖的獨特嘅「企業價值鏈」,未來幾十年香港都唔會有人買賣舖多過我哋。
"Choices in the value proposition that limit what a company will do are essential to strategy because they create the opportunity to tailor activities in a way that best delivers that kind of value." by Michael Porter
「選擇」係重要嘅! 你公司就要選有乜嘢做,同更重要 - 有乜嘢唔做,咁你先至可以更加度身訂造地做好你成條「企業價值鏈」,去為你嘅「價值主張」創造最佳價值。
有興趣一齊研究下點做? 聽多啲 Michael Porter,就來我星期六嘅早餐會啦! 下集我再同你講 (3) Trade-offs different from rivals 同競爭對手,應該有什麼不同的「取捨」?
。。。。。
My hobby 《星期六早餐會》!
九月份早餐會 Topic: Applying "Michael Porter" to your business: How to compete and win!
哈佛分享: 如何應用「米高波特」於你盤生意? 點競爭? 點贏?
講起哈佛策略教授, 無人出名過 Michael Porter. 有幸我2017年在哈佛親身上過他教的課程, 今次早餐會同你分享,希望對你做生意亦有所啟發。
有興趣參加啦 😃 每次限四位 (包括我)。 人多傾唔到計。
9月份,逢星期六早上9時開始,約三小時。地點中環。
對象: 中小企老闆/創業者/公司管理層,連我限4位。
有興趣參加的話,請 whatsapp 你的名片給 Suki (我助手) (+852) 5566 1335。
我唔係靠呢行搵食,免費,我請食早餐 😉 Be friends ..... 有機會到時見你。李根興 Edwin
www.edwinlee.com.hk
www.bwfund.com
聯絡李根興 whatsapp (+852) 90361143
#michael_porter #競爭策略
zero-sum game 在 Elites insider 企業精英 Facebook 的最佳貼文
你肯定知道錢,但是大部分人對於金錢的認知是錯誤的。我們大部分認知來自於父母和老師。他們教育我們的財富公式是:
.
👉【財富的獲取 = 努力工作後得到的工資】
所以幾乎所有人都會陷入一個循環,小時候努力學習,考上好的學校。畢業後加入到一個好的公司。努力工作得到更好的薪水。
這個公式初看沒什麼問題,你也是認同的。這才是危險的地方。你的人生潛能很有可能被這個所謂的正確公式鎖死了。
如果你和身邊很多真正成功的人聊天。你會發現財富的公式應該是:
‼【財富的獲取 = 去解決一個問題 + 運用足夠大的槓桿】
🔺要理解這個公式,我們先來了解一下金錢是什麼?
.
站在社會的角度,金錢是在你為社會解決了一個問題後,社會給你的回報。金錢遊戲不是一個零合遊戲(zero-sum game),而是一個正合遊戲(positive-sum game)。理論上錢是賺不完的。不會存在說因為你變得有錢了,別人就不能變得有錢了。要記住,你沒錢並不是因為富人賺走了你的錢,而是你沒有為社會解決足夠大的問題。有些同學會不好意思賺錢,這種思想是不能有的,有能力的人,就應該要擁有更多的財富。那些賺不到錢,又在說自己不屑於賺錢的人,其實只是他沒有解決足夠大的問題而已。
.
👉找一個足夠大的問題
.
⭕你的目標就是去找到一個問題去解決,而不是盯著錢。許多人都把這個因果關係搞反了。你父母/老師教給你的公式是「努力工作後得到的工資」是財富,你的目標是錢,你甚至都不在乎你做的是什麼工作,你只是想要一份薪水高,穩定的工作而已。我面試過無數多的候選人,問他們為什麼選擇這份工作。理由大部分是:有好的薪水,更大的上升空間,更穩定。還是盯著錢。很少人真正對做的事情感興趣,對解決問題感興趣。如果把目標搞錯了,自己又不知道想要幹嗎的人,就不要抱怨別人壓榨你。有很多人以為自己做生意會賺很多錢,所以選擇創業。還是先盯著錢,先去找一個可能賺錢自己又能做的事情:開一個奶茶店,開一個餐廳,但是很少去想真正為社會解決了什麼需求。這樣的生意也大概率不會賺到多少錢。如果比要做的事情更讓你激動的,是創業本身。那麼要注意了,這很有可能會讓你因此而浪費好幾年。
.
⭕所以先找到社會上一個問題,一個痛點。是這個社會還沒有很好解決方案的。不要告訴我沒有。有太多問題需要被解決。或者你認為有些問題解決不了?停止抱怨。一定有解決方案。社會的進步,就是靠著這羣解決問題的人,社會也會給予豐厚的回報。你覺得打車很難,特別是惡劣的天氣,計程車有時候還拒客。你只是抱怨幾句,覺得這個問題太大自己解決不了。程維就做出了滴滴,現在打車方便多了。他解決了社會上一個大家都存在的大問題。所以他能財富自由。如果你覺得現在的滴滴還是不夠好,你能不能想出一個比滴滴更好的解決方案?如果你能,那麼你也能成功。
.
⭕你解決的問題越大,社會給你回報就越大。人們有獲取信息的需求。在以前,報社通過編輯寫文章,賣報紙獲利的形式滿足了某些用戶對信息的需求。但還有大量的用戶不買報紙,需求沒有被滿足。今日頭條通過算法改變了傳統的分發信息形式,人人可發布信息,人人也可以獲取個性化優質信息。解決了更大人羣的訴求。社會也就給予其更豐厚的回報。
.
⭕如果你真的想成為一個不平凡的人。第一步,去找到一個社會中存在的足夠大的問題。如果你還沒有找到,多去體驗這個世界,多去和別人交流,一定有無數多的大問題等著大家去解決。如果你現在覺得迷茫,就是因為你還沒找到那個你想用這一輩子解決的大問題。
.
✅鼓勵大家年輕的時候多去探索這個世界,去世界各地走走,和不同文化和階層的人交流。你的視野決定了你的世界。也決定了你能看到多大的問題,解決多大的問題。隻在城市裡呆著的人是體會不到農村人刷拼多多的快樂的。只在國內呆著也很難感受到國際化帶來的文化碰撞與機遇。
.
✅如果你已經下定決心解決一個問題了,請不要動搖。不要因為哪天哪個公司願意高薪挖你,或者遇到困難,你就放棄了。
.
✅如果已經找到一個問題,那麼恭喜,你已經成功了50%。那麼接下來,就是如何去解決這個問題。
.
#elitesinsider
加入群組:https://www.facebook.com/groups/2026540257666105/
-------------------------------
加入「精英閣」= 一年陪你读完100本经典好书
➡️15-20分钟读书音频
➡️干货总结思维导图
📍還在等什麼?趕緊点击鏈接🔗:https://pay.weread.com.tw/facebook/jingyingge/
-------------------------------
馬來西亞 Shopee FREE Shipping
https://shp.ee/a54n9zf
zero-sum game 在 豐富 Youtube 的最佳貼文
主持人:楊應超
第一季-第5集:美國大選對股市的影響
節目直播時間:週五 14點
本集播出日期:2020.10.09
⏭ 章節:
00:00 頻道片頭
00:07 開場
00:27 節目片頭
00:45 美國大選對股市的影響
14:50 Q&A:看什麼投資書比較好?
31:28 Q&A:賺錢比存錢重要
39:33 請繼續提問:你活著不是為了工作,祝大家早日達到財務自由
42:36 節目片尾
📝 名詞補充:
1. Recession:經濟蕭條
2. GDP:國內生產總值
3. Nancy Pelosi:美國眾議院院長
4. House of Representatives:美國眾議院
5. Senate:美國參議院
6. Roth IRA:羅斯IRA (不是傳統IRA),美國退休帳戶
7. Noise:分析中不重要的雜音訊息
8. Fixed Income:固定收入
9. Zero-Sum Game:零和遊戲
10. Natural Hedge:自然避險
11. Charles Schwab–ETF:QQQ, SPY, DIA
12. Anticipate:預測未來的情況
13. Scenario analysis:場景分析
📚 參考書訊:
1.《財務自由的人生:跟著首席分析師楊應超學華爾街的投資技巧和工作效率,40歲就過FIRE的優質生活》 https://eslite.me/w24ad
2.《Principles: Life and Work》Ray Dalio Principle 橋水基金創始人投資法則書 https://pse.is/wj4qb
3.《MONEY Master the Game: 7 Simple Steps to Financial Freedom》Tony Robbins 安東尼羅賓理財書 https://pse.is/xduqp
4.《One Up On Wall Street: How To Use What You Already Know to Make Money in the Market》Peter Lynch著 https://pse.is/vtgdw
#楊應超 #財務自由 #FIRE
-----
訂閱【豐富】YouTube頻道:https://www.youtube.com/c/豐富
按讚【豐富】FB:https://www.facebook.com/RicherChannel
zero-sum game 在 王炳忠 Youtube 的最讚貼文
🔥支付寶打賞:13581883245
🔥王炳忠今日頭條:搜索「王炳忠台灣」
🔥王炳忠臉書粉專:https://www.facebook.com/bingzhong.wang
♦♦♦
The Real Threat to the US is the loss of self-confidence
──An Open Letter to Mr. Secretary Mike Pompeo
My name is Wang Ping-Chung, the spokesperson for the New Party, Taiwan’s political party. During the ongoing pandemic of the Covid-19, the enemy of all human beings, including the American people and Chinese people, is definitely the corona virus. However, as Secretary of State of the United States, you seem to consider China instead of the virus to be your enemy. It lets you do little in pandemic prevention but much in blaming the WHO and China. You have even made great efforts to politicalize the issue of public health in order to attack China, which reflects the United States’ prevailing concept of so-called China’s threat. Nevertheless, the real threat to the US is not China but the loss of self-confidence indeed.
As President Franklin Roosevelt once said, “Only thing we have to fear is the fear itself.” The threat you have to fear today is not other peoples but yourselves. Even though you have done your best to shift blames on the WHO and China, the fact is already clear of the US domestic misdiagnosed cases, which had been seen as H1N1 but in fact corona virus since last autumn. It is also your fault in underestimating the severity of the epidemic while China sacrificed itself to let the world have more preparation time. Accordingly, the Covid-19 has killed more than fifty thousand people in America. As China’s population is four times larger than the US, it is quite shocking that America’s death toll due to the Covid-19 has been above China’s.
I feel so sorry for the suffering of your people, yet it is never too late to mend. However, not only did you palm off the responsibility on others, but you also undermined international solidarity against the pandemic. Moreover, you even try to deny the status of the WHO as the coordinator for universal combat against diseases, which in some way means challenging the global institutions under the governance of the United Nations. It is so unbelievable that the United States, viewing itself as the world leader above half a century, is tending to destroy the world order recognized by the international society. The very reason I can think of is the loss of America’s self-confidence. It is the threat to both the US and the whole world.
For Liberalists in the United States, China has been believed either an opponent or a violator to international institutions. As far as it’s concerned, there had been debates whether to keep containing China economically and militarily or engaging it institutionally. Both were resulted from America’s confidence in its leadership. Consequently, the confidence gradually changed into arrogance, luring the United States into aggressions upon other countries as the global superpower without permission from the UN Security Council. It made America exhausted at last. Therefore, the United States has become an isolationist, and even a betrayer to the global institutions they established before. On the contrary, China seems more like a protector of the world order.
On the other hand, for Realists, the predominant thinkers in international politics, China has been seen as the primary rival to America. As they estimate there will be threat if any other regional hegemony occurs, the nation’s fear becomes beyond what its capability can hold. To some extent, this is the real crisis to your people. In fact, different from western nations developing themselves by oppressing and exploiting others, the Chinese people have risen out of poverty at the cost of blood, sweat, and tears of our own. I would like to remind you of Franklin Roosevelt’s self-evident words that nothing to fear but fear itself. The only threat you should conquer is the threat in your mind.
As Henry Kissinger has argued, relations between China and the United States need not – and should not – become a zero-sum game. He also suggested that China and America build a Pacific community with each other. Thinking in the same way, Chinese President Xi also claimed that the vast Pacific Ocean has enough space for the two large countries of China and the United States. Furthermore, I believe the world is large enough to embrace different political and social systems. As western liberalism in recent years has met difficulties in over-consumption and government failure, we should be more open-minded to the superiority of Chinese governance in some fields, especially the high efficiency in defeating the epidemic. The United States should also be more self-confident to have China rising under the global governance of international institutions, sharing with mutual benefits instead of destroying each other. Without doubt, only by doing so can the United States overcome the real threat and bring the world peace and prosperity, the real universal values for all mankind.
zero-sum game 在 MONEY HERO Youtube 的最佳解答
เปิดพอร์ตหุ้นต่างประเทศ http://partners.etoro.com/B12996_A84803_TClick_Smoneyhero.aspx
สมัครเรียน line@ : https://lin.ee/iDPznwt
เปิดพอร์ตหุ้นแบบ online http://bit.ly/stocksMindmap
แอปดูกราฟ https://youtu.be/uFCJ_xR_uwE
สอนดูกราฟหุ้นมือใหม่ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2mW1qQwuCOE
สั่งหนังสือเจาะตื้นหุ้น https://serazu.com/web/product/2050
ติดต่องาน email : ubuwall@gmail.com
fanpage FB : อ่านงบการเงินไม่ยาก #หุ้นคือ #กราฟหุ้น #เล่นหุ้น #เล่นหุ้นอะไรดี #ซื้อหุ้นตอนไหนดี #หุ้นปั่น
zero-sum game 在 Zero-Sum Game - Investopedia 的相關結果
Poker and gambling are popular examples of zero-sum games since the sum of the amounts won by some players equals the combined losses of the others. Games like ... ... <看更多>
zero-sum game 在 Zero-sum game Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster 的相關結果
: a situation in which one person or group can win something only by causing another person or group to lose it Dividing up the budget is a zero-sum game. Learn ... ... <看更多>
zero-sum game 在 零和博弈- 維基百科,自由嘅百科全書 的相關結果
零和博弈(粵拼:ling wo bok jik;英文:zero-sum game),或者叫零和遊戲,係博弈論(game theory)同相關領域上成日用到嘅一個概念。如果話一場博弈係一場零和 ... ... <看更多>