關於 waste my time中文 ，我們在網路上蒐集到這些相關的討論、資訊與評價

【韓樂】 Ailee - Make up Your Mind
https://chiungying.pixnet.net/blog/post/35987213

#Ailee #Make_up_Your_Mind #Lovin'

【After Winning Majority in LegCo: Beijing's Crackdown May Trigger International Intervention】

***感謝Hong Kong Columns - Translated，將我早前撰寫『議會過半想像：以「#國際攬炒」反制「臨立會2.0」』長文（https://www.facebook.com/joshuawongchifung/photos/a.313299448762570/2887650867994069/）翻譯成英文，鼓勵國際社會關注立會選舉一旦過半的沙盤推演，在最惡劣形勢下的制衡策略。***

中文精簡版本：https://www.facebook.com/joshuawongchifung/photos/a.564294826996363/2888641404561682/

Hongkongers have experienced our revolution for over half a year. They no longer take a consequentialist view to the effectiveness of their movement as they did years ago, or waste time second-guessing the intentions and background of fellow activists. Following the defensive battles at CUHK and PolyU, November’s District Council election saw a great victory of unity. More marvellous is the union between peaceful and “valiant” protesters.

In the process of resisting tyranny, the people have realised that one cannot prioritize one strategy over another. This is also how the common goal of “35+” came into being—the hope that we will win over half of the seats in the Legislative Council (LegCo) this September, such that the political spectrum that represents the majority of Hongkongers is able to gain control of legislative decisions. The political clout of Hongkongers will increase if 35 or more seats are successfully secured on our side. It is certainly one vital step to achieve the five demands within the system.

The possibility of realizing legislative majority

Technically it is not unrealistic to win a majority even under the current undemocratic system. Back in the 2016 LegCo election, we already won 30 seats. In addition to the District Council (First) functional constituency seat that is already in the pocket of the pan-democrats, as long as the candidates in Kowloon East and New Territories West do not start infighting again, we could safely secure 33 seats based on the number of pan-dem votes in 2016.

The other 3 seats required to achieve a majority depend on democrats’ breakthrough among the functional constituencies by dispersing the resources of the Liaison Office. They also count on whether the turnout this September could exceed 71.2% — that of last year’s District Council elections. Some of the factors that could affect the turnout include: will the epidemic persist into the summer? Will there be potential violent repression of protests in the 2 weeks preceding the election? Will Hong Kong-US relations be affected by the downturn of the global economy?

Therefore, the ambition of “35+” is to be prioritised by the resistance as both a means and an end. I have already expressed my support for an intra-party primary at the coordination meeting. In the meantime, it is pleasing to see the ongoing debates reaching a consensus of maximising the seats among geographical constituencies in the upcoming election.

Whilst enthusiastic coordination, we should also assess the post-election landscape and gauge Beijing’s reactions: if we do not reach 35 seats, Hong Kong will be subject to tighter control and more severe repression by China; but if the democratic parties successfully form a majority in LegCo, CCP’s fears of a “constitutional crisis” would become imminent. Hence, the key questions are how the Pan-Democrats should deal with the volatile political situation in Hong Kong and how they are going to meet Beijing’s charge head-on.

Watching out for Beijing’s dismissal of LegCo after reaching majority

To take back control of LegCo such that it faithfully reflects the majority’s principles and needs is the definition of a healthy democracy. Recently, however, DAB’s Tam Yiu-chung has warned that the plan of the Pan-Dems to “usurp power” in the LegCo would only lead to Beijing’s forceful disqualification of certain members or the interpretation of the Basic Law. This proves that winning a majority in LegCo is not only a popular conception but also a realistic challenge that would get on the nerves of Beijing. Could Beijing accept a President James To in LegCo? These unknown variables must be addressed upon achieving a majority.

While there is no telltale sign as to Beijing’s exact strategy, we are already familiar with the way CCP manipulated the Basic Law in the past 4 years. Having experienced three waves of disqualifications in LegCo, twice kicked out of LegCo with my team, and thrice locked up in jail, I have no false hopes of an easy compromise from Beijing: they would not let Pan-Dems control LegCo for half a year and wait (as is the proper procedure) until after having negatived the Budget to dissolve the legislature, and thereby giving them an easy victory in the re-elections. The greater the Pan-Dems threaten Beijing’s rule in Hong Kong, the more likely that it will trigger Beijing’s repression.

Since the disqualification and arrest of lawmakers have already become “normalised”, one can even imagine the police stepping into the LegCo building to force Pan-Dems into voting. Neither is it beyond our imagination to expect the CCP to kick out all 70 lawmakers in a fit of rage and replace them with a provisional LegCo “2.0” [HKCT note: The first was from 25 Jan 1997 to 30 Jun 1998]. To depend on a majority that could lead to a chapter of a “new testament” for One Country, Two Systems is perhaps what many elites long for, but they are overly optimistic:for a ticket to the promised land will not be available at the Chief Executive election campaign a year and a half later.

Admittedly, the Pan-Dems cannot unilaterally initiate “Laam-chaau” [HKCT note: mostly translated into “scorched-earth” mentality or “mutual destruction”; some even translated into “If I burn, you burn with us”]. The most they can do is to force a standstill of the government, and not for long the LegCo will have been eliminated from the equation to make the wheels turn again. It all leaves the plan of “Negativing the motion → Dissolving LegCo → Re-election after re-election → the stepping down of Carrie Lam” merely as overly positive speculation, probably resulting from their overestimate of CCP's capacity for rational calculation. The Pan-Dems must guard their frontlines and recognise what the biggest threat from Hong Kong to China could be. In this case, should LegCo sessions be disrupted or suspended, the Pan-Dems would have to be well prepared to surmount the expected obstacles and prevent the disqualification crisis 4 years ago—a Catch-22 indeed.

Productive tension from global intervention: Using Laam-chaau against the CCP

What aggravates the CCP the most is the potential threat to Hong Kong’s unique status as the one and only “separate customs territory”. Any miscalculation will compromise its role as the Chinese economy’s “white gloves”. Imagine if CCP were to disqualify all 70 elected lawmakers and convene a meeting north of the Shenzhen River to pass a resolution to Hong Kong’s affairs (much like the Provisional Legislative Council “1.0" in 1997), how great will the shock be in a world with an effective Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act? However hard it is to predict the future one thing is certain: With the US presidential election just around the corner, blows to the separation of powers would not be tolerated, and the West would necessarily effect countermeasures against the Hong Kong government.

Beijing has been relying upon Hong Kong to navigate the international community for decades. While clamping down on the political freedom of the cosmopolitan city, Beijing desires to maintain the financial centre’s economic freedom. Hence, we started lobbying for the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act four years ago, and today we are determined to promote “Laam-chaau” on an international scale.

The will of the voters must be reflected in an election. If a “35+” legislature were to be dismissed and replaced, such flagrant violation of democracy would assuredly cause a greater backlash than the infamous extradition bill. Knowing what the reality ahead of us could be, we have to combine our election and international strategies to oppose the placement of a 35+ LegCo with an “Emergency Legislative Council 2.0”, to advance an international “Laam-chaau” to Hong Kong’s status as “separate customs territory”. Only then will we stand a chance to resist the regime and to realise the five demands.

Adjusting our mindset: Overcoming the “constitutional crisis” to reach a resolution

Upon the realization of the “35+” LegCo, it is expected that the CCP will launch a devastating counterattack. The Pan-Dems should not expect LegCo to run normally; neither can the lawmakers realise their governing blueprints they have for Hong Kong. Rather, candidates will be able to compete against one another with visions of a liberated Hong Kong through popular vote. Bringing this point up has nothing to do with undermining the common goal of reaching a majority in LegCo, but rather channels the battle of LegCo to positive use upon the rule of law’s death and a “constitutional crisis” ahead. Knowing that Hongkongers have nothing to fall back on, all Pan-Dems should not miss the only way to the realization of “35+”.

Thus, be they partisans, nonpartisans, incumbent politicians, amateur politicians, or the civil society as a whole – if we stay in the political discourse of 2016 and continue to perpetuate old stereotypes, that is to deal with the divisions on the pan-democratic camp by favouring the most “local” faction; to consider only resource allocation and self-aggrandizement as the purpose of a LegCo campaign; to ignore how potential lawmakers are fitted to what specific roles; to turn a blind eye to the journey of resistance since last summer (extending indefinitely into the future)—They would lead as astray and cost us lose a precious opportunity for change by winning a 35+ majority.

The extent to which the pan-democrats can stay united in light of the political atmosphere since last summer is another problem that our side must to address. Before the watershed moment of 12th June 2019, many democratic delegates were trapped in the mentality of needing to “preserve people’s livelihood”, “be content of what we have accomplished”, and other strategies that favours stability. As the government refuses to heed to the five demands, whether the democrats, especially those in the functional constituencies, have the political will to go all-in is the real difficult question that confronts us in the upcoming LegCo election.

All in all, if “35+” cannot be realised, it is unsurprising to see LegCo being more heavily suppressed in the next 4 years; even if "35+" is achieved, it is questionable whether the pan-democrats are able to weather multiple attacks, verbal or physical, from the regime (judging from its power in the last four years) and utilise the international Laam-chaau strategy against the displacement of LegCo. Adhering to the motto of “we fight on, each in his own way”, I can only hope that Hongkongers in elections, street confrontations and international front can reconcile with each other, so that we may collectively compel the government to yield to our demands in the next six months. It is only by reaching a resolution before a real constitutional crisis that we can combat the institutional violence of the regime and not be devoured by it.

https://hkcolumn.blogspot.com/2020/04/joshua-wong-after-winning-majority-in.html?fbclid=IwAR216gf53pG_j9JOpDfr2GItvjLfrFSekKTPzoEs3-s9KBqvPEwz865P8vw

【姊說好的華麗復出與傾巢分享系列之三：
🌾阿卡送給池上胡宅親朋好友的影像紀錄情書💌】
／
#ComeBackStage
#TaiwanLongStay2018
／
早在台灣時阿卡就做好了這支很私人的影片，不過我近情情怯，只分享給了有出場的親友們看。倒是阿卡一直心心念念催促我分享出來，但是我心裡還是猶豫不決。（外加很怕胡老媽會唸說她沒有美麗出場怎麼發表給大家看啦😂）
／
耶誕和新年假期待在加泰隆尼亞卡媽家期間，即使地中海無敵海景再美、大餐再豐盛，我卻整個人近乎腦死（不要問為什麼... 很恐怖...），即使想寫點什麼都沒力。昨天晚上幾乎像逃難地回到馬德里，在文青區摩肩接踵吵雜紛亂的老咖啡酒館裡，終於找回身心安頓且靈感活絡的感覺！（不是因為我愛好城市，而是「氣場」的關係！）
／
於是我想起我和阿卡在假期中唯一有機會進行的一場有火花的對話（場景當然是在小鎮裡的小酒館吧台邊），我們在討論我第二次看、阿卡被我逼看的⟪Before Sunset⟫，順便談起電影藝術是否應該文以載道？這麼一部只涵蓋了世上極少部份中產階級幸運人兒感情生活的電影，是否可稱作普世的好電影？（澄清：我們都極愛這部電影！只是喝了小酒就喜歡探討價值觀與藝術的功能啦...）
／
這個問題以前時時困惑我，跟阿卡開始工作後也常自問，後來我為自己找到了答案。我認為藝術應該要能傳遞真、善、美三種美德的其中一項，美很難得，要是真實又能啟動善念，那就更有層次了。
／
阿卡這部片子不是什麼藝術作品，也說不上創作，只是我們和家人好友深秋時分在池上數日的真實紀錄，腳本是生活裡的浮光掠影、靈感是自然之美、演員是真摯的親情友情與人情。但我再看一次卻感受到了滿滿的「人生真善美」，想到我們的對話、日後創作的目標、在台灣被愛包圍的生活，差點兒落淚！（逃難後，媳婦感傷... 懷念自家餐桌上總是熱鬧自在火花四射的氛圍！）
／
冒著被胡老媽罵的風險（並且出賣出場的家人友人），在此分享：
＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿
池上風味 The Good Fish, Always steamed.
（好魚要用蒸的）
￣￣￣￣￣￣￣￣￣￣￣￣￣￣￣
https://vimeo.com/299546677
／
阿卡的描述：

Slow Food. Slow Scenes.
So you are warned: This is very LONG 😉 Don't waste your time if you are not ready for those Little Ordinary Big Things.

My wife, Hu, is from Taiwan and her parents live in Chishang, a town in the East Rift Valley of the island. This is how I've lived when I was there, spending quality time with her family, slowly. Shopping for food, road trips, joking with friends, laughing with kids, and good, hmmm, probably the best food in the country cooked by Mama Hu and her executive chef Papa Hu.
／
翻譯年糕：

慢食，長鏡頭。（其實阿卡偷偷但是認真地要像侯孝賢致敬！為此在台北搭火車前還特地買了腳架...）
我在此警告：這片很長 😉 如果你對於那些渺小平凡的大事兒沒有辦法接應的話，不要浪費時間看。

我太太，老胡，來自台灣，她的父母親住在島上花東縱谷的一個鄉鎮－池上。這部片是關於我在那兒的生活，與她的家人緩慢地渡過有品質的時光。去買菜、開車旅行、和朋友們笑鬧、跟孩子們嬉鬧、以及由Mama Hu和她的行政主廚Papa Hu烹飪出來的好吃，嗯，很可能是台灣最好吃的料理。
／
語言：中文、閩南語、客家話、英文、西班牙文

★歡迎加入 Telegram 頻道★
https://t.me/alvinist
為避免 Facebook 粉絲專頁、Instagram 或 YouTube 等社群平台的被動推播及演算法讓艾草錯過重要訊息及公告，我們已經成立官方 Telegram 頻道。
未來我們將在這推播影片更新通知及重要公告，如直播預告、抽獎訊息等。
歡迎加入艾爾文的 Telegram 官方頻道，重要訊息公告不漏接！

* 目前為測試階段，艾爾文還在熟悉軟體中。
歡迎行動力超強的艾草搶先加入，我們之後再正式公告給所有艾草們。

▉步驟如下：

❶ 下載 Telegram Messenger
到 App Store 或 Google Play 下載 Telegram Messenger 這款 APP。
進入 APP，使用電話註冊。

❷ 建議進行隱私設定。
打開 APP ➝ Setting ➝ Privacy and Security
建議把 Privacy 的 Phone Number 設定為 Nobody。

❸ 加入官方頻道
在 Chats（聊天室）分頁，搜尋「Alvinist」，接著點下方的 Join。
* 艾爾文保證不隨意推送訊息，拜託請勿將通知關閉。

❹ 若想將 APP 的介面更換為中文版，可以在我們的頻道當中的置頂訊息，最下面的按鈕「將此軟體介面更換為繁體中文」即可。

❺ 推送內容
- 頻道重要通知及公告。
- 新影片通知、連結專門送。
- 直播、行動派艾草專屬直播通知。
- 抽獎訊息、得獎公告。
- 偶爾放送未公開的內容。

★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★

►本集使用音樂►
1. Don't Waste My Time - Dayon
2. Get Up Again - Gamma Skies
3. Life Is for Living - Ivy-Rose Lyon
4. Walking on Cloud Nine - Sture Zetterberg

★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★

▶行動派艾草▶ 會員持續募集中

▉「行動派艾草」是什麼？
這是 YouTube 推出的「定期型群眾募資」。
俗氣的說，就是：用錢支持喜歡的創作者。
可依照自己的能力，選擇支持方案。
行動派艾草 / 每個月 75 元（新台幣）；
銀級行動派艾草 / 每個月 450 元（新台幣）；
金級行動派艾草 / 每個月 900 元（新台幣）；
尊絕行動派艾草 / 每個月 1,600 元（新台幣）。

YouTube 將抽取三成費用。
其餘的將提供給創作者，（希望可以）無憂無慮的創作、添購設備器材等。

▉ 如何加入？❤❤❤
點選以下網址，綁定信用卡即可：
https://www.youtube.com/alvinist/join

▉ 行動派艾草有什麼福利？
☑ 解鎖 YouTube 會員專屬討論專區，獲得專屬貼文。
☑ 提供 VLOG 好聽的音樂下載網址。（VLOG 發佈以後，於專屬貼文公佈）
☑ 獲得勳章，在貼文或直播中留言，用戶名稱旁會出現勳章。
☑ 每月或隔月會員專屬直播。
☑ 偶爾會有會員限定抽獎。

★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★

►艾爾文的社群 / 歡迎追蹤►
▎所有社群平台連結：https://linktr.ee/Alvinist
▎Telegram 官方公告頻道: https://t.me/alvinist
▎YouTube 子頻道：http://youtube.com/coopaler
▎Instagram 很精彩: http://www.instagram.com/alvinist
▎Facebook 粉絲專頁: http://www.facebook.com/alvinistvlog
▎Twitter 偶爾更新: http://www.twitter.com/alvinist
▎Weibo 偶爾更新: http://www.weibo.com/alvinist
▎Bilibili 同步上傳: https://goo.gl/CxC4ZX

►艾耳聞 Podcast 博客收聽平台►
▎Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2RVWA36
▎Spotify Podcasts: https://spoti.fi/3eDkytP
▎Google Podcasts: https://bit.ly/3bxKkgS
▎SoundOn 請搜尋「艾爾文」

►我的器材 / My Gear►
https://kit.co/Alvinist

►合作請洽►
alviniststudio@gmail.com

►親愛的艾爾文時間► 信件及包裹寄送地址
【中文】23599 中和宜安郵局第 171 號信箱
【英文】P.O.BOX 171 Zhonghe Yi-an, New Taipei City, 23599 Taiwan (R.O.C)

《Sun Dance》
We Two
作詞：Aimerrhythm
作曲：飛内将大
編曲：玉井健二．飛内将大
歌：Aimer
翻譯：澄野
意譯：CH

版權聲明:
本頻道不握有任何音樂所有權，亦無任何營利，一切僅為推廣用途。音樂所有權歸原始創作者所有。請支持正版。

Copyright Info:
Be aware this channel is for promotion purpose only without any illegal profit. All music's ownership belongs to the original creators.
Please support the original creator.

すべての権利は正当な所有者/作成者に帰属します。あなたがこの音楽（または画像）の作成者で、この動画に使用されたくない場合はメッセージまたはこのYoutubeチャンネルの概要のメールアドレスにご連絡ください。私はすぐに削除します。

如果你喜歡我的影片，不妨按下喜歡和訂閱，你的支持就是我創作的最大原動力！
If you like my videos, please click like and subscribe! Thx :)

粉絲團隨時獲得最新訊息！
https://www.facebook.com/chschannel/

Check my Facebook page for more information!
https://www.facebook.com/chschannel/

背景 / Background - ねぇ、行こう - 成瀬ちさと:
https://www.pixiv.net/member_illust.php?mode=medium&illust_id=67655421


翻譯連結 / Referenced Translation :
https://home.gamer.com.tw/creationDetail.php?sn=4480159

日文歌詞 / Japanese Lyrics :
We don't need, we don't get the things in order
No time to waste　そうきっと
右へ　左へ turn, turning over
No side　でもういいよね？


Make a noise and louder
そのセリフは柄じゃないけど　いいや
We will find out　飽きがくるまで 朝が来るまで all right


We cool! What a cool sound!
目を閉じて鳴らすの the good song
We fool! What a fool dance!
手を取って踊るよ anyone can't stop
We two, melody loops　とびきりのセンスで
Give me your sound to dance


We don't need, we don't get the things in order
No time to waste　そうきっと
西へ　東へ　手の鳴るほうへ
No side でもういいよね？


ずっと響くナンバー
その名前は忘れてるけど　いいや
We will find out? I can't tell the end 朝が来るまで all right


We cool! What a cool sound!
目を閉じて鳴らすの the good song
We fool! What a fool dance!
手を取って踊るよ anyone can't stop
We two, melody first　意味なんてないよね
君の sound to dance


Make a noise and louder
そのセリフは柄じゃないけど　いいや
We will find out　飽きがくるまで 朝が来るまで all right


We cool! What a cool sound!
目を閉じて鳴らすの the good song
We fool! What a fool dance!
手を取って踊るよ anyone can't stop
We two, melody loops　とびきりのセンスで
Give me your sound to dance

中文歌詞 / Chinese Lyrics :
我們從不、從不需要做事井然有序
早已沒時間可浪費，一秒鐘也沒有！
不論是向左或是向右移動翻轉
就算沒有方向也行吧？


「再大聲點，就算發出躁雜的聲響也無妨！」
雖然這一句話並不像是我會說的，算啦
我們將持續尋覓目標，直到我們都厭煩為止、直到太陽升起為止，沒問題的！


我們比誰都厲害！種種聲響多麼美妙！
猶如閉上眼敲醒一切的曼妙歌曲
宛若笨蛋一般，跳起笨拙的舞蹈吧！
牽起彼此的手起舞吧！不論任何人都不再停下腳步
你我一同令歌曲放肆循環，帶著絕佳的體驗放肆迴轉
就讓我伴隨你的聲音起舞吧！


我們從不、從不需要做事井然有序
早已沒時間可浪費，一秒鐘也沒有！
不論是向西還是向東，只要朝著手與手的掌聲前進
就算沒有方向也行吧？


一直在腦中反覆迴響聽見的數字
雖然早就已經忘記那名字了，算啦
我們能否再次憶起呢？我也說不上答案，但直到太陽升起之前，沒問題的！


我們比誰都厲害！種種聲響多麼美妙！
猶如閉上眼敲醒一切的曼妙歌曲
宛若笨蛋一般，跳起笨拙的舞蹈吧！
牽起彼此的手起舞吧！不論任何人都不再停下腳步
即便只有兩人，也讓旋律優先，也許並不需要任何意義吧？
就這麼讓你的聲音一同翩翩起舞


「再大聲點，就算發出躁雜的聲響也無妨！」
雖然這一句話並不像是我會說的，算啦
我們將持續尋覓目標，直到我們都厭煩為止、直到太陽升起為止，沒問題的！


我們比誰都厲害！種種聲響多麼美妙！
猶如閉上眼敲醒一切的曼妙歌曲
宛若笨蛋一般，跳起笨拙的舞蹈吧！
牽起彼此的手起舞吧！不論任何人都不再停下腳步
你我一同令歌曲放肆循環，帶著絕佳的體驗盡情迴轉
就讓我伴隨你的聲音起舞吧！

First, I'd like to state that I'm against 1. the challenge to donate structure, 2. the waste of water, and 3. ALS Association doing animal testing.
Raising awareness through creativity and fun is good, but it's becoming more of a contest and joke at times. It's a horrible disease and shouldn't be portrayed as anything like fun. My own father is a cancer survivor, if I were to see the disease in the social media this way, I would be f*ing pissed. Do the ends justify the means? How many celebs recorded the video and donated without putting much thought? How many of you have been watching those viral videos, had a good laugh, but not donating to any charity?
Therefore, I wouldn't be recording this video if I was not challenged by a fellow streamer friend. Hopefully you may get to understand ALS as a disease, like any other fundraising campaigns in need of public attention. I won't be naming anyone in particular, as I believe donations should NOT be a challenge or a hype. It's a selfless habit and one should take his own time to consider the causes that he cares most about.

Here are more information on different causes that you could help out:

ALS Association: http://alsa.pub30.convio.net/
Animal Rescue Team Taiwan: http://www.savedogs.org/english/
World Vision for children: http://www.worldvision.org/
Charity: Water: http://www.charitywater.org/

Sorry, I'm so serious.
May we all have a little more love for each other in this big big world.


我中文可能表達不當，請包涵。首先，我是反對１．捐助是挑戰的形式、２．浪費水、３．漸凍人研究採動物實驗。這樣的創意與好玩引起社會大眾注意確實是達到了，可是它很多時候變得扭曲像競賽像玩笑。這個病症是殘酷的，一點都不該是這樣的媒體形象。試問有多少公眾人物錄了影片、捐了也沒認識它太多？有多少觀眾看了很多冰桶挑戰影片，笑了，卻沒有捐助任何慈善團體？為了達到目的，就可以不擇手段嗎？所以如果不是被友善的實況主點名，我不會錄這個影片。或許我的觀眾因此而認識這個病症，開始了解其他需要被關注的募款。我不會點名任何人，因為捐助該是自發的習慣，無須挑戰或流行。每一個人都有能力去捐助這個世界，多一點愛與關懷，花一點時間選擇你想要支持的目標。抱歉我太嚴肅～

____________________________________
#himechar #video #icebucketchallenge #IBC #ALS #water #donation #charity #animaltesting #animalrescue


If you enjoyed the video "LIKE" and Subscribe!　喜歡影片請按讚及訂閱
-- Watch live at http://twitch.tv/himechar　實況
-- Like http://facebook.com/himechar　粉專
-- Follow http://twitter.com/himechar　推特
-- Photos http://instagram.com/himechar　照片