The coordinated effort has led to a site seizure and up to $500,000 in recovered ransom.
seizure attack 在 Engadget Facebook 的精選貼文
同時也有1部Youtube影片，追蹤數超過57萬的網紅蒼藍鴿的醫學天地，也在其Youtube影片中提到，封面圖片來源: http://ethan-hsieh.blogspot.tw/2015/09/chills.html 本影片僅供教育用途 ▶FB粉專 https://www.facebook.com/bluepigeonnn/ ▶Instagram https://www.instagr...
「seizure attack」的推薦目錄：
seizure attack 在 華人民主書院 New School for Democracy Facebook 的最佳解答
[Statement on the Hong Kong SAR Government Invoking the Emergency Regulations Ordinance]
1. The Hong Kong SAR Government has invoked the Emergency Regulations Ordinance (“ERO”) to implement the Prohibition on Face Covering Regulation (“PFCR”) which will come into force at midnight on 5 October 2019. The PFCR will ban anyone from covering their faces in full or partially for mere presence in lawful rallies and marches, unlawful or unauthorised assemblies, or riots. The definition of “covering” includes surgical masks, gas masks, and other materials such as face paint. The PFCR also gives the police the power to order anyone to remove such covering.
2. The ERO is an outdated and vague piece of legislation that dates back to the 1920s. Its outdatedness makes it non-compatible with modern notions of civil liberties and rule of law. Its vaguesness confers enormous discretionary powers to the executive branch, which in turn makes it open to abuse especially in the current political climate where the government is under mounting pressure to put an end to the social unrest at any cost.
3. The ERO grants extensive powers to the executive branch to enact any regulation on the pretext of “public emergency” and “public danger", neither of which is defined under the ERO and can be broadly interpreted. More disconcertingly, the ERO contains no sunset clauses or other limits as to when such emergency or disorder would cease to exist. These decisions are to be made solely by the Chief Executive in council, who may go on to enact other regulations on a similar pretext, including curfews, martial law, censoring of social media and other communications or seizure of personal property. This slippery slope raises serious accountability and abuse of power concerns.
4. The PLG believes that the invocation of the ERO bypasses the legislative branch and undermines the constitutional checks and balances on the executive branch. The government's move represents a brazen disregard of the Legislative Council and further erodes Hong Kong's well-established separation of powers.
5. More crucially, the invocation of the ERO does nothing to quell the current social unrest or address the protesters' demands that have fueled months of violent clashes with the police. If anything, the PFCR will incite protesters even more and lead to further escalation of the movement.
6. Contrary to the government's claim that the PFCR is aimed at addressing violence, the fact that it applies equally to peaceful and violent demonstrators is a direct contradiction of that pretext. This is especially troubling considering that nonviolent protest participants are facing increasing pressure and threats of reprisal from their employers and are subject to random mobile phone checks at mainland border controls. Furthermore, without face masks, participants will be more exposed to tear gas and pepper spray during street demonstrations, both of which contain harmful toxins with potentially long term health effects. As such, the PFCR is expected to have a chilling effect on even legal protests and violate citizens' right to privacy and freedom of assembly.
7. What is more unjust and arbitrary is that according to the Secretary for Security, the PFCR exempts police officers from the face covering ban. Over the past four months, the city has witnessed increasingly violent and abusive behaviour on the part of law enforcement. The one-sidedness of the PFCR may result in increased impunity among officers and encourage them to step up violent crackdown of protesters who, apropos, have been demanding a more accountable police force among other things.
8. Broad and unchecked powers beget abuse, and any abuse of power threatens the rule of law. The invocation of the ERO today is a signal that the current administration is not interested in engaging the public in a constructive dialogue but that it continues to rely on the blunt instrument of law enforcement to solve a political crisis, even at the cost of tarnishing Hong Kong's reputation as a free port and financial hub.
9. The PLG calls on the government to immediately withdraw the PFCR and issue an apology for such an ill-conceived and unjustified attack on the rule of law and civil liberties.
The Progressive Lawyers Group
4 October 2019
(PDF: https://tinyurl.com/y5fvpdok)
seizure attack 在 Sam Tsang 曾思瀚 Facebook 的最佳解答
[Statement on the Hong Kong SAR Government Invoking the Emergency Regulations Ordinance]
1. The Hong Kong SAR Government has invoked the Emergency Regulations Ordinance (“ERO”) to implement the Prohibition on Face Covering Regulation (“PFCR”) which will come into force at midnight on 5 October 2019. The PFCR will ban anyone from covering their faces in full or partially for mere presence in lawful rallies and marches, unlawful or unauthorised assemblies, or riots. The definition of “covering” includes surgical masks, gas masks, and other materials such as face paint. The PFCR also gives the police the power to order anyone to remove such covering.
2. The ERO is an outdated and vague piece of legislation that dates back to the 1920s. Its outdatedness makes it non-compatible with modern notions of civil liberties and rule of law. Its vaguesness confers enormous discretionary powers to the executive branch, which in turn makes it open to abuse especially in the current political climate where the government is under mounting pressure to put an end to the social unrest at any cost.
3. The ERO grants extensive powers to the executive branch to enact any regulation on the pretext of “public emergency” and “public danger", neither of which is defined under the ERO and can be broadly interpreted. More disconcertingly, the ERO contains no sunset clauses or other limits as to when such emergency or disorder would cease to exist. These decisions are to be made solely by the Chief Executive in council, who may go on to enact other regulations on a similar pretext, including curfews, martial law, censoring of social media and other communications or seizure of personal property. This slippery slope raises serious accountability and abuse of power concerns.
4. The PLG believes that the invocation of the ERO bypasses the legislative branch and undermines the constitutional checks and balances on the executive branch. The government's move represents a brazen disregard of the Legislative Council and further erodes Hong Kong's well-established separation of powers.
5. More crucially, the invocation of the ERO does nothing to quell the current social unrest or address the protesters' demands that have fueled months of violent clashes with the police. If anything, the PFCR will incite protesters even more and lead to further escalation of the movement.
6. Contrary to the government's claim that the PFCR is aimed at addressing violence, the fact that it applies equally to peaceful and violent demonstrators is a direct contradiction of that pretext. This is especially troubling considering that nonviolent protest participants are facing increasing pressure and threats of reprisal from their employers and are subject to random mobile phone checks at mainland border controls. Furthermore, without face masks, participants will be more exposed to tear gas and pepper spray during street demonstrations, both of which contain harmful toxins with potentially long term health effects. As such, the PFCR is expected to have a chilling effect on even legal protests and violate citizens' right to privacy and freedom of assembly.
7. What is more unjust and arbitrary is that according to the Secretary for Security, the PFCR exempts police officers from the face covering ban. Over the past four months, the city has witnessed increasingly violent and abusive behaviour on the part of law enforcement. The one-sidedness of the PFCR may result in increased impunity among officers and encourage them to step up violent crackdown of protesters who, apropos, have been demanding a more accountable police force among other things.
8. Broad and unchecked powers beget abuse, and any abuse of power threatens the rule of law. The invocation of the ERO today is a signal that the current administration is not interested in engaging the public in a constructive dialogue but that it continues to rely on the blunt instrument of law enforcement to solve a political crisis, even at the cost of tarnishing Hong Kong's reputation as a free port and financial hub.
9. The PLG calls on the government to immediately withdraw the PFCR and issue an apology for such an ill-conceived and unjustified attack on the rule of law and civil liberties.
The Progressive Lawyers Group
4 October 2019
(PDF: https://tinyurl.com/y5fvpdok)
seizure attack 在 蒼藍鴿的醫學天地 Youtube 的精選貼文
封面圖片來源: http://ethan-hsieh.blogspot.tw/2015/09/chills.html
本影片僅供教育用途
▶FB粉專 https://www.facebook.com/bluepigeonnn/
▶Instagram https://www.instagram.com/bluepigeon0810/
歡迎蒞臨討論，別忘了按讚跟追蹤！影片也歡迎分享！
[重要急救小常識-癲癇的處置方式與迷思]
如果你對於癲癇的印象還停留在
「癲癇發作會咬到自己的舌頭!!快塞東西進去他的嘴裡!!」
「有人癲癇發作，快叫救護車!!」
那你已經中了癲癇的迷思了 事實上
#塞東西進去患者嘴裡可能引發致命的危險
#大部分情況下是不用叫救護車的
什麼不能塞東西 那麼我們該怎麼做?
別急 #看完影片就知道囉!
資料來源:
1. 癲癇教學影片 Everyday First Aid: Seizure (epilepsy)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7MPJauo4DdY&t=22s
「Kevin MacLeod」創作的「Breaktime - Silent Film Light」是根據「Creative Commons Attribution」(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) 授權使用
來源：http://incompetech.com/music/royalty-free/index.html?isrc=USUAN1100302
演出者：http://incompetech.com/
seizure attack 在 Types of seizures, Symptoms, Pathophysiology, Causes and ... 的美食出口停車場
... <看更多>