關於 music review jobs ，我們在網路上蒐集到這些相關的討論、資訊與評價

- ตอนนี้ ผมไม่มีรายได้จากยูทูป(แล้ว) -

ก้าวสู่ผู้ติดตาม 50,000 คน ในยูทูป
ต้องขอบคุณทุกท่านจากใจจริง
ที่ทำให้ผมมาถึงวันนี้ได้

แต่ในช่วงเวลาที่ควรจะดีใจนี้ มีสิ่งที่น่าแปลกใจ
นั่นคือ ผมถูกยูทูป "ปิดการสร้างรายได้"

--------------------------------

แปลภาษาไทย เป็นภาษาไทย ก็คือ
ผมจะไม่มีรายได้ จากโฆษณาต่างๆ ที่โผล่ในคลิป "เลย"
ถ้ามีโฆษณาขึ้น แสดงว่าไม่เกี่ยวกับผมแล้ว

โดยยูทูปให้เหตุผลว่า ผมนำคลิปบุคคลที่ 3 มาอัพซ้ำ
โดยไม่ดัดแปลงแก้ไขหรือพากย์อะไรเป็นแบบของตัวเอง
หรือ พูดง่ายๆ เหมือนผมก๊อปมาอัพทั้งดุ้น

ซึ่งเค้าก็ไม่ได้แจ้งผม ว่ามันคือ คลิปไหนยังไง

และทิ้งวิธีการแก้ไข ให้ผมคือ ลบคลิปเหล่านั้น
แล้วยื่นสมัคร รับรายได้ใหม่ ในเดือน กันยายน

--------------------------------

ฟังดูอาจไม่ใช่เรื่องใหญ่อะไร ก็แค่ลบคลิปเจ้าปัญหานั้นสิ
ใช่ครับ มันจะไม่ใช่เรื่องใหญ่อะไร
หากเรารู้ว่ามันคือคลิปใด ที่เป็นต้นเหตุ

แต่หากเราไม่รู้ต้นตอ
มันก็เหมือนการรักษาของหมอ
ที่ไม่รู้ว่าผู้ป่วย ป่วยเป็นอะไร
มันแก้ไม่ได้ นอกจากแก้ไขมั่วๆ

ถูกจุดไหมก็ไม่รู้

>>> ผมอีเมล์ถามเจ้าหน้าที่ฉบับแรก

ว่าคลิปที่มีปัญหาคือคลิปไหน?
ผมจะได้แก้ไขได้ถูก

เค้าตอบกลับ ประมาณว่า ให้อ่านทบทวนระเบียบยูทูป
ตรงไหนที่ไม่ตรงระเบียบ ก็แก้ไข ลบ บลาๆ
(ซึ่งก็คือตอบกว้างๆ เราไม่รู้สาเหตุแน่ชัดอยู่ดี)

ผมพยายามเดาๆ ลบไปหลายคลิป
ใช่ครับ ก็ต้องสุ่มลบไป เพราะเราไม่รู้ต้นตอ

--------------------------------

>>> หลังผมลบคลิปไปพอสมควร

ผมอีเมล์ไปฉบับที่สอง ว่าผมลบคลิปที่ผมสงสัยไปพอสมควร
พอจะให้ใครช่วยเช็คได้ไหม ว่าผมแก้ไขได้ถูกจุดหรือไม่

หรือ ถ้ามีคลิปไหนมีปัญหา แจ้งผมให้ชัดเจนได้ไหม

เจ้าหน้าที่ยังตอบมาคล้ายฉบับเดิม ว่า...

เค้าไม่มีอำนาจในการตอบแบบนั้น
แต่ถ้าผมไม่ทำผิดระเบียบ ก็ไม่ต้องห่วงอะไร

สรุป ณ ตอนนี้ ผมยังไม่รู้เลย
ว่าผมมีปัญหาตรงไหน คลิปใด แก้ถูกแล้วหรือยัง
เหนื่อยที่จะอีเมล์ถามแล้ว

แม้จะยื่นสมัครอีกที ก็ไม่รู้จะผ่านหรือเปล่า

--------------------------------

รายได้จาก โฆษณายูทูปของผม ไม่เยอะหรอกครับ
เดือนนึง พันกว่าบาท ใช่ครับ พันกว่าบาท

ทำงานอื่นๆ งานอะไรก็ตาม ได้เยอะกว่านี้อยู่แล้ว
ทุกวันนี้ ผมก็ควักจากรายได้งานส่วนตัว มาลงตรงนี้

แต่เงินน้อยนิดที่ว่านี้ มันคือกำลังใจอย่างนึง
ว่า เออ เงินน้อยก็เงินนะ มาจากการทำสิ่งที่เราชอบนะ

ไว้จ่ายค่าไฟ ค่าเน็ท อะไรเล็กๆน้อยๆก็ยังดี
แต่พอมันเป็นศูนย์ มันก็เฟลๆ
ซึ่งไม่ได้เกี่ยวกับจำนวนเงิน

--------------------------------

ถามว่า สมมติว่า
ผมจะไม่ได้รายได้จากยูทูปแบบนี้ตลอด
ผมจะทำอย่างไร

ผมก็คงทำคลิปต่อไป ทำช่องต่อไปครับ

อย่างน้อย มองในแง่ดี เราไม่ถึงกับถูกปิดช่อง
ตอบแทนคนดู ที่สนับสนุนเรามาถึงวันนี้
จะด้วยการสนับสนุน ด้านเงิน สิ่งของ กำลังใจ ก็แล้วแต่

แต่ก็ต้องมาแจ้งให้ทราบ ว่าเรื่องมันเป็นแบบนี้

--------------------------------

ทุกวันนี้ ผมยังโดนอีเมล์แจ้งลิขสิทธิ์(แบบเบาๆ)
จากคลิปเกมต่างๆเรื่อยๆ

โดนแจ้งน่าจะปลอมๆบ้าง
โดนเรื่องดนตรีประกอบบ้าง
เรียกว่า เป็นเรื่องปกติไปแล้ว
จนจำได้เลยว่า ค่ายไหน แนวไหน โดนแน่ๆ

เข้าใจเลยว่า ทำไมสตรีมเมอร์ ไปเล่นเกมออนไลน์
หรือ ทำคลิปประเภทอื่น

ส่วนหนึ่ง เพราะมันไม่มีปัญหาเหล่านี้

ไม่มีอะไรหรอก
มาบ่นให้ฟัง จึงเรียนมาเพื่อทราบครับผม
- Now I have no income from YouTube (anymore) -

Step to 50,000 subscribers on YouTube
Thanks to all of you sincerely.
That got me to this day

But during this time of gladness there are surprises.
That's how I was on YouTube ′′ Turn Off Making Money ′′

--------------------------------

Translate Thai to Thai language is.
I won't have any income from ads shown in the clip ′′ at all ′′
If there is a commercial, it's not about me anymore.

On YouTube, I'm bringing you a 3rd party clip to upload.
Without modification, fixing or dubbing anything is my own way.
Or simply saying it like me. I copied it and uploaded it.

He didn't tell me which clip it was.

And left me a solution to delete those clips.
Then apply for new income in September

--------------------------------

Sounds like it's not a big deal. Just delete that problem clip.
Yes, it won't be a big deal.
If only we knew which clip it was the cause.

But if we don't know the origin
It's like a doctor's treatment.
I don't know what sick patients are.
It can't be solved except randomly fixing.

I don't know if it's right.

>>> I emailed the first issue of officer.

Which clip is the problem?
So I can fix it right

He replies to read and review the YouTube regulations.
Wherever it is not order, I fix it. Blah blah blah blah.
(Which is a wide answer. I don't know the reason for sure.)

I tried to guess. Deleted many clips.
Yes, I have to randomly delete it because I don't know the origin.

--------------------------------

>>> After I deleted the clip somewhat.

I emailed to the second issue that I deleted some clips I suspect.
Can anyone check if I can fix it at the right point or not?

Or if there is any problem, can you inform me clearly?

The officer still answers similarly that...

He has no power to answer that.
But if I don't do the wrong thing, don't worry about anything

In summary, I don't know yet.
How do I have a problem? Which clip is correct yet?
Tired to email asking

Even if I apply again, I don't know if I will pass it.

--------------------------------

Not a lot of income from my youtube ads.
One month, over a thousand baht. Yes, it's over a thousand

Working on other jobs, whatever job, I got more
Nowadays, I'm gouging from income of private work here.

But a little money that I think is encouraging.
I think so. Less money is money. It comes from doing what I like.

It's good to pay for the electricity bill for internet.
But when it's zero, it's flawless.
Which is not about the amount of money.

--------------------------------

Asking that I'm assuming
I won't always get income from YouTube like this.
What do I do?

I would have done the next clip. Keep doing the channel.

At least optimistic we don't even get closed.
Giving back to the audience who supported us today.
Whether it's with money support, stuff, morale is up to you.

But I have to inform you that it's like this.

--------------------------------

Nowadays, I still get copyrighted (lightly) emailed.
From various game clips.

Being informed should be fake sometime.
Got hit by some music
It's called normal.
I remember which camp is which. I will definitely hit it.

I understand why streamers go online games.
Or make a different type of clip

Part because it doesn't have these problems.

There is nothing.
Come to complain and listen. So I study to know.Translated

根據計算，100萬人遊行隊伍要從維多利亞公園排到廣東；200萬人遊行則要排到泰國。

順道一提香港15～30歲人口約莫100出頭萬人。以照片人群幾乎都是此年齡帶來看，兩個數字都是明顯誇大太多了。

另一個可以參考的是1969年的Woodstock Music & Art Fair，幾天內湧進40萬人次，照片看起來也是滿山滿谷的人。（http://sites.psu.edu/…/upl…/sites/851/2013/01/Woodstock3.jpg）

當年40萬人次引發驚人的大塞車，幾乎花十幾個小時才逐漸清場。

而香港遊行清場速度明顯快得多。

順道一提，因此運動而認定「你的父母不愛你」的白痴論述也如同文化大革命時的「爹親娘親不如毛主席親」般開始出現：

https://www.facebook.com/SaluteToHKPolice/videos/350606498983830/UzpfSTUyNzM2NjA3MzoxMDE1NjMyMTM4NjY3MTA3NA/

EVERY MAJOR NEWS outlet in the world is reporting that two million people, well over a quarter of our population, joined a single protest.
.
It’s an astonishing thought that filled an enthusiastic old marcher like me with pride. Unfortunately, it’s almost certainly not true.
.
A march of two million people would fill a street that was 58 kilometers long, starting at Victoria Park in Hong Kong and ending in Tanglangshan Country Park in Guangdong, according to one standard crowd estimation technique.
.
If the two million of us stood in a queue, we’d stretch 914 kilometers (568 miles), from Victoria Park to Thailand. Even if all of us marched in a regiment 25 people abreast, our troop would stretch towards the Chinese border.
.
Yes, there was a very large number of us there. But getting key facts wrong helps nobody. Indeed, it could hurt the protesters more than anyone.
.
For math geeks only, here’s a discussion of the actual numbers that I hope will interest you whatever your political views.
.
.
DO NUMBERS MATTER?
.
People have repeatedly asked me to find out “the real number” of people at the recent mass rallies in Hong Kong.
.
I declined for an obvious reason: There was a huge number of us. What does it matter whether it was hundreds of thousands or a million? That’s not important.
.
But my critics pointed out that the word “million” is right at the top of almost every report about the marches. Clearly it IS important.
.
.
FIRST, THE SCIENCE
.
In the west, drone photography is analyzed to estimate crowd sizes.
.
This reporter apologizes for not having found a comprehensive database of drone images of the Hong Kong protests.
.
But we can still use related methods, such as density checks, crowd-flow data and impact assessments. Universities which have gathered Hong Kong protest march data using scientific methods include Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, University of Hong Kong, and Hong Kong Baptist University.
.
.
DENSITY CHECKS
.
Figures gathered in the past by Hong Kong Polytechnic specialists using satellite photo analysis found a density level of one square meter per marcher. Modern analysis suggests this remains roughly accurate.
.
I know from experience that Hong Kong marches feature long periods of normal spacing (one square meter or one and half per person, walking) and shorter periods of tight spacing (half a square meter or less per person, mostly standing).
.
.
JOINERS AND SPEED
.
We need to include people who join halfway. In the past, a Hong Kong University analysis using visual counting methods cross-referenced with one-on-one interviews indicated that estimates should be boosted by 12% to accurately reflect late joiners. These days, we’re much more generous in estimating joiners.
.
As for speed, a Hong Kong Baptist University survey once found a passing rate of 4,000 marchers every ten minutes.
.
Videos of the recent rallies indicates that joiner numbers and stop-start progress were highly erratic and difficult to calculate with any degree of certainty.
.
.
DISTANCE MULTIPLIED BY DENSITY
.
But scientists have other tools. We know the walking distance between Victoria Park and Tamar Park is 2.9 kilometers. Although there was overspill, the bulk of the marchers went along Hennessy Road in Wan Chai, which is about 25 meters (or 82 feet) wide, and similar connected roads, some wider, some narrower.
.
Steve Doig, a specialist in crowd analysis approached by the Columbia Journalism Review (CJR), analyzed an image of Hong Kong marchers to find a density level of 7,000 people in a 210-meter space. Although he emphasizes that crowd estimates are never an exact science, that figure means one million Hong Kong marchers would need a street 18.6 miles long – which is 29 kilometers.
.
Extrapolating these figures for the June 16 claim of two million marchers, you’d need a street 58 kilometers long.
.
Could this problem be explained away by the turnover rate of Hong Kong marchers, which likely allowed the main (three kilometer) route to be filled more than once?
.
The answer is yes, to some extent. But the crowd would have to be moving very fast to refill the space a great many times over in a single afternoon and evening. It wasn’t. While I can walk the distance from Victoria Park to Tamar in 41 minutes on a quiet holiday afternoon, doing the same thing during a march takes many hours.
.
More believable: There was a huge number of us, but not a million, and certainly not two million.
.
.
IMPACT MEASUREMENTS
.
A second, parallel way of analyzing the size of the crowd is to seek evidence of the effects of the marchers’ absence from their normal roles in society.
.
If we extract two million people out of a population of 7.4 million, many basic services would be severely affected while many others would grind to a complete halt.
.
Manpower-intensive sectors of society, such as transport, would be badly affected by mass absenteeism. Industries which do their main business on the weekends, such as retail, restaurants, hotels, tourism, coffee shops and so on would be hard hit. Round-the-clock operations such as hospitals and emergency services would be severely troubled, as would under-the-radar jobs such as infrastructure and utility maintenance.
.
There seems to be no evidence that any of that happened in Hong Kong.
.
.
HOW DID WE GET INTO THIS MESS?
.
To understand that, a bit of historical context is necessary.
.
In 2003, a very large number of us walked from Victoria Park to Central. The next day, newspapers gave several estimates of crowd size.
.
The differences were small. Academics said it was 350,000 plus. The police counted 466,000. The organizers, a group called the Civil Rights Front, rounded it up to 500,000.
.
No controversy there. But there was trouble ahead.
.
.
THINGS FALL APART
.
At a repeat march the following year, it was obvious to all of us that our numbers were far lower that the previous year. The people counting agreed: the academics said 194,000 and the police said 200,000.
.
But the Civil Rights Front insisted that there were MORE than the previous year’s march: 530,000 people.
.
The organizers lost credibility even with us, their own supporters. To this day, we all quote the 2003 figure as the high point of that period, ignoring their 2004 invention.
.
.
THE TRUTH COUNTS
.
The organizers had embarrassed the marchers. The following year several organizations decided to serve us better, with detailed, scientific counts.
.
After the 2005 march, the academics said the headcount was between 60,000 and 80,000 and the police said 63,000. Separate accounts by other independent groups agreed that it was below 100,000.
.
But the organizers? The Civil Rights Front came out with the awkward claim that it was a quarter of a million. Ouch. (This data is easily confirmed from multiple sources in newspaper archives.)
.
.
AN UNEXPECTED TWIST
.
But then came a twist. Some in the Western media chose to present ONLY the organizer’s “outlier” claim.
.
“Dressed in black and chanting ‘one man, one vote’, a quarter of a million people marched through Hong Kong yesterday,” said the Times of London in 2005.
.
“A quarter of a million protesters marched through Hong Kong yesterday to demand full democracy from their rulers in Beijing,” reported the UK Independent.
.
It became obvious that international media outlets were committed to emphasizing whichever claim made the Hong Kong government (and by extension, China) look as bad as possible. Accuracy was nowhere in the equation.
.
.
STRATEGICALLY CHOSEN
.
At universities in Hong Kong, there were passionate discussions about the apparent decision to pump up the numbers as a strategy, with the international media in mind. Activists saw two likely positive outcomes.
.
First, anyone who actually wanted the truth would choose a middle point as the “real” number: thus it was worth making the organizers’ number as high as possible. (The police could be presented as corrupt puppets of Beijing.)
.
Second, international reporters always favored the largest number, since it implicitly criticized China. Once the inflated figure was established in the Western media, it would become the generally accepted figure in all publications.
.
Both of the activists’ predictions turned out to be bang on target. In the following years, headcounts by social scientists and police were close or even impressively confirmed the other—but were ignored by the agenda-driven international media, who usually printed only the organizers’ claims.
.
.
SKIP THIS SECTION
.
Skip this section unless you want additional examples to reinforce the point.
.
In 2011, researchers and police said that between 63,000 and 95,000 of us marched. Our delightfully imaginative organizers multiplied by four to claim there were 400,000 of us.
.
In 2012, researchers and police produced headcounts similar to the previous year: between 66,000 and 97,000. But the organizers claimed that it was 430,000. (These data can also be easily confirmed in any newspaper archive.)
.
.
SKIP THIS SECTION TOO
.
Unless you’re interested in the police angle. Why are police figures seen as lower than others? On reviewing data, two points emerge.
.
First, police estimates rise and fall with those of independent researchers, suggesting that they function correctly: they are not invented. Many are slightly lower, but some match closely and others are slightly higher. This suggests that the police simply have a different counting method.
.
Second, police sources explain that live estimates of attendance are used for “effective deployment” of staff. The number of police assigned to work on the scene is a direct reflection of the number of marchers counted. Thus officers have strong motivation to avoid deliberately under-estimating numbers.
.
.
RECENT MASS RALLIES
.
Now back to the present: this hot, uncomfortable summer.
.
Academics put the 2019 June 9 rally at 199,500, and police at 240,000. Some people said the numbers should be raised or even doubled to reflect late joiners or people walking on parallel roads. Taking the most generous view, this gave us total estimates of 400,000 to 480,000.
.
But the organizers, God bless them, claimed that 1.03 million marched: this was four times the researchers’ conservative view and more than double the generous view.
.
The addition of the “.03m” caused a bit of mirth among social scientists. Even an academic writing in the rabidly pro-activist Hong Kong Free Press struggled to accept it. “Undoubtedly, the anti-amendment group added the extra .03 onto the exact one million figure in order to give their estimate a veneer of accuracy,” wrote Paul Stapleton.
.
.
MIND-BOGGLING ESTIMATE
.
But the vast majority of international media and social media printed ONLY the organizers’ eyebrow-raising claim of a million plus—and their version soon fed back into the system and because the “accepted” number. (Some mentioned other estimates in early reports and then dropped them.)
.
The same process was repeated for the following Sunday, June 16, when the organizers’ frankly unbelievable claim of “about two million” was taken as gospel in the majority of international media.
.
“Two million people in Hong Kong protest China's growing influence,” reported Fox News.
.
“A record two million people – over a quarter of the city’s population” joined the protest, said the Guardian this morning.
.
“Hong Kong leader apologizes as TWO MILLION take to the streets,” said the Sun newspaper in the UK.
.
Friends, colleagues, fellow journalists—what happened to fact-checking? What happened to healthy skepticism? What happened to attempts at balance?
.
.
CONCLUSIONS?
.
I offer none. I prefer that you do your own research and draw your own conclusions. This is just a rough overview of the scientific and historical data by a single old-school citizen-journalist working in a university coffee shop.
.
I may well have made errors on individual data points, although the overall message, I hope, is clear.
.
Hong Kong people like to march.
.
We deserve better data.
.
We need better journalism. Easily debunked claims like “more than a quarter of the population hit the streets” help nobody.
.
International media, your hostile agendas are showing. Raise your game.
.
Organizers, stop working against the scientists and start working with them.
.
Hong Kong people value truth.
.
We’re not stupid. (And we’re not scared of math!)

!!!史上最臭的面?今天终于鼓起勇气来挑战了！真的真的不是普通的臭，根本就是垃圾车的味道！怎么还那么受欢迎呢？想想就觉得恐怖了对吧?!?
一起来看看到底这个面是什么来头呀！
还有还有也煮了麻辣海底捞水煮鱼??? 给老公尝试，能pass吗？???

? 记得SUBSCRIBE(订阅) &打开小铃铛就可以第一时间收到新影片消息啦！?

更多日常分享在我的Instagram► https://www.instagram.com/keikei_chang/

快來訂閱我的Youtube► https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC0G8GIV7bzfblgOMJtqzC8w

?????????????
海底捞麻辣香锅 l 超便宜又简单 l HaiDiLao Spicy Recipe https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tHqJ2bJeyP0&t=74s

与老公第一次在家搞海底捞火锅?! 到底能吃吗? HaiDiLao Hotpot At Home? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8KsmKirwoE0&t=50s

拿啤酒来煮麻辣川菜？？老公自创料理 Spicy Beer Chicken l Easy Recipe【Keikei Recipe】
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M77WB6uFyLs&t=92s

马来西亚封国的第77天！我终于忍不住啦！Escape From Home l Malaysia MCO Day77
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16E2jciaDDs&t=7s

当妈前VS当妈后 Single life Vs Mom Life (备孕中的
https://youtu.be/PoCmInBRmwk

全职妈妈的24小时到底在干些什么?! 超真实日常 Highest Salary Jobs - Full Time Mother
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bFEF7ooPUcU

让宝宝爱上吃粥！大口大口地吃完一碗粥～ 宝宝副食品营养粥 l Healthy Baby Food
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bfBGfMiSLy4

小资女看过来! 平价实用的大创好物分享 Daiso Haul l Best Buy Item in Daiso (2020)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_8RP5X87F-I&t=41s

Shopee买宝宝物品? 辅食添加物/零食/玩具 Shopee Haul & Review l Must Buy Item【开箱Unboxing】
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YHehJIfcheg&t=158s





Track: Melody of Happiness — Igor Khainskyi [Audio Library Release]
Music provided by Audio Library Plus
Watch: https://alplus.io/melody-happiness
Free Download / Stream: https://youtu.be/i0a0T0bTaW0

Major props to my friend Ollie (Head of Talent at Golden Gate Ventures) for filming this video! In part 1, we’ll be discussing how we both got our jobs, the different types of work visas in Singapore, and how you can get your visa sponsored. In the next few videos, we’ll also be covering topics around how to stand out amongst the crowd when job hunting at Singaporean companies, tips for fresh grads, resume & interview advice and answering specific questions around working in tech, venture capital (VC), and the startup space.

• Timestamps •
How Ollie got his job & work visa 1:38
How Sherry got her job & work visa 5:27
Do you apply for a visa before applying for jobs? 7:55
Types of work visas (salary, things to note, eligibility) 9:39
Quota on work passes / Which jobs are more competitive? 14:45
A recruiter’s POV on local vs. foreign talent 16:06
Other types of visas (e.g. internship/co-op) 17:21
How can foreigners get their visa sponsored? What companies are open to recruiting outside of Singapore? 18:23
Interesting opportunity for those looking to work at a startup 21:42

• Resources to look at •
Employment Pass: https://www.mom.gov.sg/passes-and-permits/employment-pass
S Pass: https://www.mom.gov.sg/passes-and-permits/s-pass
Training Employment Pass: https://www.mom.gov.sg/passes-and-permits/training-employment-pass
EDB initiative on startups that raised funding: https://www.edb.gov.sg/en/how-we-help/incentives-and-schemes/tech-sg.html ***CORRECTION: The EDB Singapore scheme is for startups that secured more than US$10M funding in the past 36 months (not US$20M). Click the link for more info.

• Tech newsletters to subscribe to •
Tech in Asia https://www.techinasia.com/
Techcrunch https://techcrunch.com/
DealStreetAsia https://www.dealstreetasia.com/newsletter/
e27 https://e27.co
The Ken Southeast Asia https://the-ken.com/sea/
Asia Tech Review https://asiatechreview.com/
*If there are any other newsletters you like, leave a comment and I'll add to this list :)

? Instagram http://www.instagram.com/sherrybyw
☀️ Facebook http://www.facebook.com/sherrybyw
? TikTok https://bit.ly/2ZRS1Kn

Let's chat!
For random questions - sherry@abrushofbeauty.com
For business inquiries - info@abrushofbeauty.com

•••••••••••••••••••••••••••• CAMERA, EQUIPMENT, AND MUSIC ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Music by Gil Wanders - Dreams - https://thmatc.co/?l=1CB95E97

Canon EOS 70D
Canon EF-S 24mm f/2.8

#singapore #expat #jobhunting

女人生孩子相当于鬼门关走一圈！生孩子十指全开到底有多痛？
有人说是十根肋骨断掉的感觉，有人说是被人拿着刀往撕裂的伤口上猛砍！
今天就让我来跟大家聊一聊我的生产全记录吧！
想知道更多的话，就把影片看完吧！

? 记得SUBSCRIBE(订阅) &打开小铃铛就可以第一时间收到新影片消息啦！?
更多日常分享在我的Instagram► https://www.instagram.com/keikei_chang/
快來訂閱我的Youtube► https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC0G8GIV7bzfblgOMJtqzC8w

❤谢谢收看 Thanks For Watching❤

【上一期】
生产怀孕的的各种疑问Q&A | 孕期知识 | 孕期营养 | 孕妇瑜伽 Q&A for Pregnancy | Prenatal Yoga | Pregnancy Diet
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G_tGs4VmOAM&t=226s

全职妈妈的24小时到底在干些什么?! 超真实日常 Highest Salary Jobs - Full Time Mother
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bFEF7ooPUcU

新手妈妈的待产包/走佬袋 WHAT IS IN MY HOSPITAL BAG?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYhx4kAUSb8&t=20s

我的孕期爱用品&必需品: 妊娠霜/怀孕APP/孕妇奶粉/哺乳内衣/孕妇裤 l Pregnancy Must Have
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3n1K3FTzakw&t=347s

我的淘宝孕妇装分享 | 孕期穿搭 | 淘宝好物 | My Pregnancy Outfit | Taobao Haul
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FiIjgEvO4DA&t=121s

生男生女看征兆？准吗？这几个特征告诉你！Boy or Girl? Sign of Your Baby Gender
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-hWLCwPUFx4&t=15s

Shopee买宝宝物品? 辅食添加物/零食/玩具 Shopee Haul & Review l Must Buy Item【开箱Unboxing】
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YHehJIfcheg&t=158s

淘了25kg母婴用品！25KG Baby Stuffs Taobao Unboxing & Haul【开箱啦Unboxing】
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=USmF3jzo8kI&t=208s

乔乔周岁の生日趴！发生那么多插曲真的很无奈！DIY Baby 1st Birthday Party【乔乔生日系列】
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3L3ZhsPPwD0

宝宝生日布置&筹备清单 Baby Birthday Decoration & Checklist (Malaysian's Birthday Preparation)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pew8gqRt-gY&t=2s

宝宝生日专辑一定要去studio拍吗? 教你如何在家拍出超ins风照片！Baby Photoshoot Idea At Home l Birthday DIY Shoot, Love It!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j03E6mO7mos&t=2s

跨洲回乡买车？吉打媳妇带你吃炒鱼！We Bought A Car!!! Finally We Can Travel to Other State~
https://youtu.be/bZxZVR7dOgo







Song : 샛별 - A New Day!
Music provided by 샛별.
Link : https://youtu.be/UzSe0YUd9BM