Search
Instagram vs Reality.
The humidity, bulky bags, props, masking behind the scenes...all the unmentionable discomfort won’t stop us from living life for the gram. 😅
📸 : My favourite person behind the lens, @efgivesyouwings.
.
Holding a preserved floral bouquet that totes looks like fresh blooms! Check out @thefloralkeep.
*Quote
.
#thefloralkeep #preservedroses #preservedblooms #eternalflowers #pomelofashion #pomelogirls @ Singapore
我今天早上在香港電台英文台的《給香港的信》，向香港人警告政府和保皇黨企圖以「假新聞」作藉口而引入對互聯網內容審查！
Beware: Hong Kong government and pro-establishment politicians are drumming up against "fake news" to justify introducing Internet censorship
-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\
You may have recently seen a series of so-called government announcements in the public interest, or API, on TV, cautioning the public to be careful about the information they receive on the internet. The API tells the public to verify and fact-check before believing these information, and not to spread misinformation, or the consequences can be devastating.
The advice is reasonable. But the intention may be dubious. Why? It is because the government and especially the police force but have been one of the biggest sources of misinformation in Hong Kong, during the last six months of pro-democracy protests which followed the government’s attempt to ram through the extradition bill. Needless to say, government claims about the extradition bill must have been some of the best examples of spreading misinformation, or simply lies. Likewise, many of the recent claims made by the police about their actions in their almost daily press conferences since this summer must be also justifiably classified as misinformation.
So, it is quite clear to many that what the government is trying to do is to monopolise what is true and what is not. In recent weeks, more and more government officials and senior police officers, running out of arguments to justify their own versions as their truths, simply resort to attacking the other sides’ views as “fake news.”
Some may remember about two month ago, a letter from the police to Facebook was leaked on social media. In the letter, the Police requested the global social media company to remove a number of posts made by different users, based on the allegation that these posts were critical of the police and would potentially harm their reputation. Fortunately, the social media company did not comply with these requests.
The issue at hand is not fake news. The issue at hand is freedom of expression, disguised by the authority in the name of countering misinformation.
This week in the Legislative Council, in a written question put up by the Honourable Ted Hui, the police admitted to 621 removal requests made this year up to the end of November to local and international Internet and social media platforms, a whopping 18 times more than in 2018. The government response puts the blame on “a vast amount of fake news and baseless accusations that targeted the Police.” It is simply ludicrous for a government with the lowest approval and credibility ratings in history to say that. To many, this government which refuses to even allow an independent commission to investigate the police is itself the biggest source of fake news, and not to be trusted.
The government seems to be saying that truth must be approved by authority, and its version of facts cannot be disputed by anyone, especially those who hold a different political view.
So really, where do fake news come from? In August, Twitter, Facebook and YouTube removed over 200,000 accounts which were tied to the China government or state media, that were used purposely to smear the Hong Kong anti-extradition protests, and to spread misinformation about the protests.
Yet, it is now the Hong Kong government and pro-establishment political figures that are making noises about fake news, saying that in order to counter these so-called misinformation, legislation should be passed to ban fake news. They would point to such legislation in other countries such as Germany and France, or Singapore.
When I was in Berlin, Germany, two weeks ago, for the Internet Governance Forum, in a summit with legislators around the world, we compared notes about censorship attempts by different governments in the name of protecting the people, but in fact at the expense of curtailing freedom of expression. A German member of parliament told me in no uncertain term that, quote, misinformation is legal is Germany, end of quote. She said that freedom of expression is enshrined in the German Basic Law and not to be compromised by any other legislation. The new law was just an attempt to regulate contents that are narrowly defined such as relating to criminal defamation, hate crimes, or Holocaust denial. But, criticising the government is certainly a right that is legally protected at the highest level of their constitution. Even so, the legislations of such laws in Germany or France were still very controversial.
When I told this German legislator that pro-government politicians in Hong Kong are justifying removal of content on social media by quoting the German example, her response was — this must be an example of using misinformation to justify laws against misinformation, that is, plain censorship. Her conclusion, laws in one land cannot be copied to another, or there will be abuse.
Hong Kong, by comparison with Germany or France, does not have the democracy and the power vested in the people to protect our people’s own rights. One can reference the recent case of Singapore, where it also passed an anti-fake news law, and in recent weeks have started to enforce it against people posting messages on Facebook. When a member of the opposition party posted an opinion opposing certain government investment decisions, the Singaporean government decided that was fake news.
So beware of the government’s evolving attempts to censor the Internet and social media, by drumming up the negative side. The Big Brother wants to stifle opinions against it, because that is the rule number one of hanging on to the authority they wish to continue to dominate. We must continue to guard against Internet censorship because no one else will save us. It is our — the people’s own — free opinion vs the government’s version of the only truth — that is what it is all about. And it’s worth the fight.
-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\
https://www.rthk.hk/…/progr…/lettertohongkong/episode/612602
#RTHK #LTHK #censorship #fakenews
我今天早上在香港電台英文台的《給香港的信》，向香港人警告政府和保皇黨企圖以「假新聞」作藉口而引入對互聯網內容審查！
Beware: Hong Kong government and pro-establishment politicians are drumming up against "fake news" to justify introducing Internet censorship
--------
You may have recently seen a series of so-called government announcements in the public interest, or API, on TV, cautioning the public to be careful about the information they receive on the internet. The API tells the public to verify and fact-check before believing these information, and not to spread misinformation, or the consequences can be devastating.
The advice is reasonable. But the intention may be dubious. Why? It is because the government and especially the police force but have been one of the biggest sources of misinformation in Hong Kong, during the last six months of pro-democracy protests which followed the government’s attempt to ram through the extradition bill. Needless to say, government claims about the extradition bill must have been some of the best examples of spreading misinformation, or simply lies. Likewise, many of the recent claims made by the police about their actions in their almost daily press conferences since this summer must be also justifiably classified as misinformation.
So, it is quite clear to many that what the government is trying to do is to monopolise what is true and what is not. In recent weeks, more and more government officials and senior police officers, running out of arguments to justify their own versions as their truths, simply resort to attacking the other sides’ views as “fake news.”
Some may remember about two month ago, a letter from the police to Facebook was leaked on social media. In the letter, the Police requested the global social media company to remove a number of posts made by different users, based on the allegation that these posts were critical of the police and would potentially harm their reputation. Fortunately, the social media company did not comply with these requests.
The issue at hand is not fake news. The issue at hand is freedom of expression, disguised by the authority in the name of countering misinformation.
This week in the Legislative Council, in a written question put up by the Honourable Ted Hui, the police admitted to 621 removal requests made this year up to the end of November to local and international Internet and social media platforms, a whopping 18 times more than in 2018. The government response puts the blame on “a vast amount of fake news and baseless accusations that targeted the Police.” It is simply ludicrous for a government with the lowest approval and credibility ratings in history to say that. To many, this government which refuses to even allow an independent commission to investigate the police is itself the biggest source of fake news, and not to be trusted.
The government seems to be saying that truth must be approved by authority, and its version of facts cannot be disputed by anyone, especially those who hold a different political view.
So really, where do fake news come from? In August, Twitter, Facebook and YouTube removed over 200,000 accounts which were tied to the China government or state media, that were used purposely to smear the Hong Kong anti-extradition protests, and to spread misinformation about the protests.
Yet, it is now the Hong Kong government and pro-establishment political figures that are making noises about fake news, saying that in order to counter these so-called misinformation, legislation should be passed to ban fake news. They would point to such legislation in other countries such as Germany and France, or Singapore.
When I was in Berlin, Germany, two weeks ago, for the Internet Governance Forum, in a summit with legislators around the world, we compared notes about censorship attempts by different governments in the name of protecting the people, but in fact at the expense of curtailing freedom of expression. A German member of parliament told me in no uncertain term that, quote, misinformation is legal is Germany, end of quote. She said that freedom of expression is enshrined in the German Basic Law and not to be compromised by any other legislation. The new law was just an attempt to regulate contents that are narrowly defined such as relating to criminal defamation, hate crimes, or Holocaust denial. But, criticising the government is certainly a right that is legally protected at the highest level of their constitution. Even so, the legislations of such laws in Germany or France were still very controversial.
When I told this German legislator that pro-government politicians in Hong Kong are justifying removal of content on social media by quoting the German example, her response was — this must be an example of using misinformation to justify laws against misinformation, that is, plain censorship. Her conclusion, laws in one land cannot be copied to another, or there will be abuse.
Hong Kong, by comparison with Germany or France, does not have the democracy and the power vested in the people to protect our people’s own rights. One can reference the recent case of Singapore, where it also passed an anti-fake news law, and in recent weeks have started to enforce it against people posting messages on Facebook. When a member of the opposition party posted an opinion opposing certain government investment decisions, the Singaporean government decided that was fake news.
So beware of the government’s evolving attempts to censor the Internet and social media, by drumming up the negative side. The Big Brother wants to stifle opinions against it, because that is the rule number one of hanging on to the authority they wish to continue to dominate. We must continue to guard against Internet censorship because no one else will save us. It is our — the people’s own — free opinion vs the government’s version of the only truth — that is what it is all about. And it’s worth the fight.
--------
https://www.rthk.hk/radio/radio3/programme/lettertohongkong/episode/612602
#RTHK #LTHK #censorship #fakenews
チャンネル登録お願いします。
→ http://u0u1.net/QWo0
★Twitter
MotorSports Battlefield ver1 (MBFv1)
@BattlefieldVer1
★ニコニコ動画
https://www.nicovideo.jp/my/top
過去にアップロードした動画を順次公開しております。
自主削除した動画が順次投稿されています。
こちらのフォローも宜しくお願いします。
もはや戦闘機なみの加速力。オールジュから離陸するF1マシン、WECマシンはこちらです。☜
☆彡画像引用【Image quote】
⚡RACER
Ricciardo and Verstappen 'bird' each other after qualifying battle | RACER
⚡Scooper
Scooper - Nigeria Sport News: Ricciardo hopes to remain in podium fight as Renault shine at Spa
⚡Autosport
F1 at Spa: How has Spa-Francorchamps changed over time?
⚡It's All Sport To Me
The Eternal Racing Tracks Part 2: Racing for Anthoine (22nd September 1996 – 31st August 2019) – It's All Sport To Me
●動画クレジット【MovieCredit】
lucky joe
Spa Francorchamps F1 fan footage track side lap
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DuHT4EX2fUI
TOYOTA GAZOO Racing
2021 WEC 6 Hours of Spa - The fastest around Spa in a Hypercar
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QMHgrL8sw-Q&t=31s
Forgeauto
Epic battle Audi vs Porsche during WEC 2015 Spa 6H
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LGQZ9XNq6mU&t=68s
OLDY V8
BEST F1 Sound exhaust V8 (PART 2)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hpvuu5MfaSk&t=16s
OLDY V8
BEST F1 Sound exhaust V8 (PART 3)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8s5P2nZNJpw
OLDY V8
BEST F1 Sound exhaust V8 Redbull Ferrari McLaren Spa Francorchamps 2009
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=seget3zOj_8
Charlie Beattie
Spa 2012 Eau Rouge Gold 3. The Start. Oh My God!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mHkW7Icu7Qc
Champion Communication
Grand Prix de Belgique 1995 - Michael Schumacher (Benetton Renault)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5TXx80o7z-Y
rferrerF1
F1 2012 - R12 - Eau Rouge Onboard mix
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ugRSMa9mu3M&t=12s
John Cash
F1 Belgian GP Spa Francorshamps 2000 - Qualifying - Jacques Villeneuve Lap
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CkgP8_ZBk2I
John Cash
F1 Spa 2005 Qualifying - Jarno Trulli Epic Lap! (Reupload)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iOno5O9UAm4
During my latest trip to Seoul, I decided to try out Ultherapy, a non-invasive lifting procedure that helps to treat fine lines, wrinkles and lifts your skin. I also tried out the Oasis Treatment which helps with skin regeneration, moisturised skin and skin tone improvement.
I was so so pleased with the end result so watch on to find out more! ✨
I booked my entire experience via JIVAKA CARE so everything was very fuss-free and easy. I didn’t have to worry about any language barrier and knew exactly what I was getting myself into!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
?? More about Jivaka Care:
1. Book your K-Beauty treatments on http://beauty.jivaka.care (Instagram: @jivaka.care)
2. Book Ulthera (https://beauty.jivaka.care/products/ulthera-skin-lifting-bioface) and Oasis Therapy (https://beauty.jivaka.care/products/oasis-therapy-bioface) in Bioface Clinic
Apply for a 1:1 video consultation with top Korean plastic surgeons: https://www.jivaka.care/remote-consultation/
3. For more information regarding these treatments, check out these blog posts:
https://www.jivaka.care/v-line-in-kor...
https://www.jivaka.care/thermage-vs-u...
? QUOTE MONGABONG AT CHECK OUT FOR A FREE BOX OF MASK!
?Aesthetic Clinic: BioFace Clinic
BIOFACE, 22 Gangnam-daero 152-gil, Sinsa-dong, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, South Korea
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOLLOW ME
► Instagram: http://instagram.com/mongabong
► Snapchat: @mongabong
► Blog: www.mongabong.com
► Email: hello@mongabong.com
►Subscribe and turn on notifications! Join the #ricefam
►訂閱訂閱訂閱 http://bit.ly/2CyRmAv
See how different my Chinese mom and French dad react to my new blonde look! I was really nervous to see how it'd look on myself, let me know what you think in the comments! Not to quote anyone but some people on Instagram said I look like Ariana Grande...
•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
FOLLOW ME!
?SUBSCRIBE! http://bit.ly/2CyRmAv
?Instagram: http://instagram.com/jlouofficial
?Facebook: http://facebook.com/JLouOfficial/
KEEP WATCHING!
►Doing Everything Asian Superstitions Tell You NOT To *迷信者慎入*:
https://youtu.be/U00xEGHES2A
►Eating 10 'Yeet Hay' Foods in 10 Minutes | 10分鐘挑戰10大熱氣食物:
https://youtu.be/KlFqh7gYhRg
►WHITEWASHED? READING YOUR ASSUMPTIONS ABOUT ME:
https://youtu.be/h8_anoWyqpI
►MY PUPPY CHOOSES MY BIKINI 狗狗幫我揀泳衣:
https://youtu.be/yRpk4kpYVUo
work hard and day by day make your self better better and better. ... <看更多>
It's me vs.me. ... to see this ᴅɪᴀɴᴇ ᴡᴡᴡ.ᴅꜱꜱᴄʜᴏᴏʟᴏꜰᴍᴏᴛᴏʀɪɴɢ.ɪᴇ ɪɴꜰᴏ@ᴅꜱꜱᴄʜᴏᴏʟᴏꜰᴍᴏᴛᴏʀɪɴɢ.ɪᴇ 087 655 6050 #quotes. ... <看更多>
me vs me quote 在 29 Me versus Me quotes ideas - Pinterest 的美食出口停車場
Jul 31, 2021 - Explore Gordon's board "Me versus Me quotes", followed by 173 people on Pinterest. See more ideas about me quotes, quotes, inspirational quotes. ... <看更多>
相關內容