Tribute to King of Pop, MJ.
Heal the World + Man in the Mirror
Original by Michael Jackson
Piano by 鄭可恩 IANT
Through the pandemic, it’s so sad that, some lost their job, some lost their business, some lost their friend, some lost their family member, some lost their loved one…
I know there is nothing much I can do, but I do hope the song gives you strength.
Stay strong everybody
Stay strong Malaysia❤️
#coversong #daniel李吉漢
#danielicate #musicboleh #就醬聽音樂 #TributeToMJ #michaeljackson #staystrongmalaysia
Please like, follow & subscribe:
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/danielicate/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/danielicate/
Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/DanielicateTV
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/3zgkPvZ
Tiktok: https://bit.ly/3hOU4cd
同時也有545部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過1萬的網紅translation,也在其Youtube影片中提到,#'93年にサンソフト、東海エンジニアリングが開発、サンソフトが発売した、SFC用シミュレーションRPG作であり、シリーズの第一作目。 企画では主人公がメカであったが結局ファンタジーに落ち着いた。また、森達男氏はセガのG-LOCのシステムにかなり影響を受け製作に取り組んだ。 基本はターン制STRの...
lost king 在 黃浩銘 Raphael Wong Facebook 的最佳貼文
毋忘五大訴求 公民抗命有理
—10‧20九龍遊行陳情書
(案件編號:DCCC 535/2020)
——————————————————
「毋忘初衷,活在愛和真實之中」
撐阿銘,即訂閱Patreon:
patreon.com/raphaelwong
—————————————————
胡法官雅文閣下:
2012年,我第一次站在法庭上承認違反「公安惡法」,述說對普選的盼望,批評公安惡法不義,並因公民抗命的緣故,甘心樂意接受刑罰。當年我說,如果小圈子選舉沒有被廢除,惡法沒有消失,我依然會一如故我,公民抗命,並且我相信將會有更多學生和市民加入這個行列。想不到時至今日,普選仍然遙遙無期,我亦再次被帶到法庭接受審判,但只是短短7年,已經有數十萬計的群眾公民抗命,反對暴政。今日,我承認違反「未經批准的政府」所訂立「未經批准的惡法」之下的「未經批准集結」罪,我不打算尋求法庭的憐憫,但請容許我佔用法庭些微時間陳情,讓法庭在判刑前有全面考慮。
暴力之濫觴
在整個反修例運動如火如荼之際,我正承擔另一宗公民抗命案件的刑責。雖然身在獄中,但仍然心繫手足。我在獄中電視機前見證6月9日、6月16日及8月18日三次百萬港人大遊行,幾多熱愛和平的港人冒天雨冒彈雨走上街頭,抗議不義惡法,今日關於10月20日的案件,亦是如此。可能有人會問,政府已在6月暫緩修例,更在9月正式撤回修例,我等仍然繼續示威,豈非無理取鬧?我相信法官閣下肯定聽過「遲來的正義並非正義」(Justice delayed is justice denied)這句格言。當過百萬群眾走上街頭,和平表達不滿的時候,林鄭政府沒有理睬,反而獨行獨斷,粗暴踐踏港人的意願,結果製造出後來連綿不絕的爭拗,甚至你死我活的對抗。經歷眾多衝突痛苦之後,所謂暫緩撤回,已經微不足道,我們只是更加清楚:沒有民主,就連基本人權都不會擁有!
在本案之中,雖然我們都沒有鼓動或作出暴力行為,但根據早前8‧18及10‧1兩宗案件,相信在控方及法庭眼中,案發當日的暴力事件仍然可以算在我們頭上,如此,我有必要問:如果香港有一個公平正義的普及選舉,人民可以在立法會直接否決他們不認可的法律,試問2019年的暴力衝突可以從何而來呢?如果我們眼見的暴力是如此十惡不赦,那麼我們又如何看待百萬人遊行後仍然堅持推行惡法的制度暴力呢?如果我們不能接受人民暴力反抗,那麼我們是否更加不能對更巨大更壓逼的制度暴力沈默不言?真正且經常發生的暴力,是漠視人民訴求的暴力,是踐踏人民意見的暴力,是剝奪人民表達權利的暴力。真正憎恨暴力,痛恨暴力的人,不可能一方面指摘暴力反抗,又容忍制度暴力。如果我需要承擔和平遊行引發出來的暴力事件的刑責,那麼誰應該承擔施政失敗所引發出來的社會騷亂的罪責呢?
社會之病根
對於法庭而言,可能2019年所發生的事情只是一場社會騷亂,務必追究違法者個人責任。然而,治亂治其本源,醫病醫其病根,我雖然公民抗命,刻意違法,控方把我帶上法庭,但我卻不應被理解為一個「犯罪個體」。2019年所發生的事情,並不是我一個人或我們這幾位被告可以促成,社會問題的癥結不是「犯罪份子」本身,而是「犯罪原因」。我明白「治亂世用重典」的道理,但如果「殺雞儆猴」是解決方法,就不會在2016年發生旺角騷亂及2017年上訴庭對示威者施以重刑後,2019年仍然會爆發出更大規模的暴力反抗。
如果不希望社會動亂,就必須正本清源,逐步落實「五大訴求」,從根本上改革,挽回民心。2019年反修例運動,其實只是2014年雨傘運動的延續而已,縱使法庭可能認為兩個運動皆是「一股歪風」所引起,但我必須澄清,兩個運動的核心就是追求民主普選,人民當家作主。在2019年11月24日區議會選舉這個最類近全民普選的選舉中,接近300萬人投票,民主派大勝,奪得17個區議會主導權,這就是整個反修例運動的民意,民意就是反對政府決策,反對制度暴力,反對推行惡法,不容爭辯,不辯自明。我們作為礦場裡的金絲雀,多次提醒政府撤回修法,並從根本上改革制度,而在10月20日的九龍遊行當然是反映民意的平台契機。如今,法庭對我們施加重刑,其實只不過是懲罰民意,將金絲雀困在鳥籠之內,甚至扼殺於鼓掌之中,窒礙表達自由。
堅持之重要
大運動過後的大鎮壓,使我們失去《蘋果日報》,失去教協,失去民陣,不少民主派領袖以及曾為運動付出的手足戰友都囚於獄中,不少曾經熱情投入運動的朋友亦因《國安法》的威脅轉為低調,新聞自由示威自由日漸萎縮,公民社會受到沈重打擊,我亦失去不少摯友,有感傷孤獨的時候,但我仍然相信,2019年香港人的信念,以及所展現人類的光輝持久未變。我不會忘記百萬人民冒雨捱熱抗拒暴政,抵制惡法,展現我們眾志成城;我不會忘記人潮紅海,讓道救護車,展現我們文明精神;我不會忘記年青志士直接行動反對苛政,捨身成仁,展現我們膽色勇氣;我不會忘記銀髮一族走上街頭保護年青人,展現我們彼此關懷;我不會忘記「五大訴求」,不會忘記2019年區議會選舉,展現我們有理有節。
法官閣下,我對於當日的所作所為,不感羞恥,毫無悔意。我能夠在出獄後與群眾同行一路,與戰友同繫一獄,實是莫大榮幸。若法治失去民主基石,將使法庭無奈地接受專制政權所訂立解釋的法律限制,隨時變成政治工具掃除異見,因此爭取民主普選,建設真正法治,追求公平正義,仍然是我的理想。在這條路上,如有必要,我仍然會公民抗命,正如終審法院海外非常任法官賀輔明(Lord Hoffmann)所言,發自良知的公民抗命有悠久及光榮的傳統,歷史將證明我們是正確的。我期望,曾與我一起遊行抗命的手足戰友要堅持信念,在艱難歲月裡毋忘初衷,活在愛和真實之中。
最後,如9年前一樣,我想借用美國民權領袖馬丁路德金牧師的一番話對我們的反對者說:「我們將以自己忍受苦難的能力,來較量你們製造苦難的能力。我們將用我們靈魂的力量,來抵禦你們物質的暴力。對我們做你們想做的事吧,我們仍然愛你們。我們不能憑良心服從你們不公正的法律,因為拒惡與為善一樣是道德責任。將我們送入監獄吧,我們仍然愛你們。」(We shall match your capacity to inflict suffering by our capacity to endure suffering. We shall meet your physical force with soul force. Do to us what you will, and we shall continue to love you. We cannot in all good conscience obey your unjust laws because noncooperation with evil is as much a moral obligation as is cooperation with good. Throw us in jail and we shall still love you.)
願慈愛的主耶穌賜我們平安,與我和我一家同在,與法官閣下同在,與香港人同在。沒有暴徒,只有暴政;五大訴求,缺一不可!願榮耀歸上帝,榮光歸人民!
第五被告
黃浩銘
二零二一年八月十九日
Lest we forget the five demands: civil disobedience is morally justified
- Statement on 10‧20 Kowloon Rally
(Case No.: DCCC 535/2020)
Your Honour Judge Woodcock
In 2012, I stood before the court and admitted to violating the "Public Security Evil Law". I expressed my hope for universal suffrage, criticized the evil law as unjust, and willingly accepted the penalty for civil disobedience. Back then, I said that if the small-circle election had not been abolished and the draconian law had not disappeared, I would still be as determined as I was, and I believe that more students and citizens would join this movement. Today, universal suffrage is still a long way off, and I have been brought before the court again for trial. But in just seven years, hundreds of thousands of people have already risen up in civil disobedience against tyranny. Today, I plead guilty to "unauthorised assembly" under an unapproved evil law enacted by an unauthorised government. I do not intend to seek the court's mercy, but please allow me to take up a little time in court to present my case so that the court can consider all aspects before sentencing me.
The roots of violence
At the time when the whole anti-extradition law movement was in full-swing, I was taking responsibility for another civil disobedience case. Although I was in prison, my heart was still with the people. I witnessed the three million-person rallies on 9 June, 16 June and 18 August on television in prison, when many peace-loving people took to the streets despite the rain and bullets, to protest against unjust laws. Some people may ask, "The Government has already suspended the legislative amendments in June and formally withdrew the bill in September, but we are still demonstrating, are we not being unreasonable?" I am sure your Honour has heard of the adage "Justice delayed is justice denied". When more than a million people took to the streets to express their discontent peacefully, the Lam administration ignored them and instead acted arbitrarily, brutally trampling on the wishes of the people of Hong Kong, resulting in endless arguments and even confrontations. After so many conflicts and painful experiences, the so-called moratorium is no longer meaningful. We only know better: without democracy, we cannot even have basic human rights!
In this case, although we did not instigate or commit acts of violence, I believe that in the eyes of the prosecution and the court, the violence on the day of the incident can still be counted against us, based on the August 18 and October 1 case. And now I must ask - If Hong Kong had a fair and just universal election, and the public could directly veto laws they did not approve of at the Legislative Council, then how could the violent clashes of 2019 have come about? If the violence we see is so heinous, how do we feel about the institutional violence that insists on the imposition of draconian laws even after millions of people have taken to the streets? If we cannot accept violent rebellion, how can we remain silent in the face of even greater and more oppressive institutional violence? The true and frequent violence is the kind of violence that ignores people's demands, that tramples on their opinions, that deprives them of their right to express themselves. People who truly hate violence and abhor it cannot accuse violent resistance on the one hand and tolerate institutional violence on the other. If I have to bear the criminal responsibility for the violence caused by the peaceful demonstration, then who should bear the criminal responsibility for the social unrest caused by failed administration?
The roots of society's problems
From a court's point of view, it may be that what happened in 2019 was just a series of social unrest, and that those who broke the law must be held personally accountable. What happened in 2019 was not something that I alone or the defendants could have made possible, and the crux of the social problem was not the 'criminals' but the 'causes of crime'. I understand the concept of " applying severe punishment to a troubled world", but if "decimation" was really the solution, there would not have been more violent rebellions in 2019 after the Mongkok "riot" in 2016 and the heavy sentences handed down to protesters by the Court of Appeal in 2017.
If we do not want social unrest, we must get to the root of the problem and implement the "five demands" step by step, so as to achieve fundamental reforms and win back the hearts of the people. 2019's anti-revision movement is indeed a continuation of 2014's Umbrella Movement, and even though the court may think that both movements are caused by a "perverse wind", I must clarify that the core of both movements is the pursuit of democracy and universal suffrage, and the people being the masters of their own house. In the District Council election on 24 November 2019, which is the closest thing to universal suffrage, nearly 3 million people voted, and the democratic camp won a huge victory, winning majority in 17 District Councils. As canaries in the monetary coal mine, we have repeatedly reminded the government to withdraw the extradition bill and fundamentally reform the system, and the march in Kowloon on 20 October was certainly an opportunity to reflect public opinion. Now, by imposing heavy penalties on us, the court is only punishing public opinion, trapping the canaries in a birdcage, or even stifling them in the palm of their hands, suffocating the freedom of expression.
The importance of persistence
As a result of the crackdown after the mass movement, we lost Apple Daily, the Hong Kong Professional Teachers' Union, and the Civil Human Rights Front. Many of our democratic leaders and comrades who had contributed to the movement were imprisoned, and many of our friends who had been passionately involved in the movement had been forced to lay low under the threat of the National Security Law. I still believe that the faith of Hong Kong people and the glory of humanity seen in 2019 will remain unchanged. I will never forget the millions of people who braved the rain and the heat to resist tyranny and evil laws, demonstrating our unity of purpose; I will never forget the crowds of people who gave way to ambulances, demonstrating our civility; I will never forget the young people who sacrificed their lives, demonstrating our courage and bravery; I will never forget the silver-haired who took to the streets to protect the youth, demonstrating our care for each other; I will never forget the "five demands" and the 2019 District Council election, demonstrating our rationality and decency.
Your Honour, I have nothing to be ashamed of and no remorse for what I did on that day. It is my great honour to be in prison with my comrades and to be able to walk with the public after my release. If the rule of law were to lose its democratic foundation, the courts would have no choice but to accept the legal restrictions set by the autocratic regime and become a political tool to eliminate dissent at any time. As Lord Hoffmann, a non-permanent overseas judge of the Court of Final Appeal, said, civil disobedience from the conscience has a long and honourable tradition, and history will prove us right. I hope that my comrades in arms who walked with me in protests will keep their faith and live in love and truth in the midst of this difficult time.
Finally, as I did nine years ago, I would like to say something to those who oppose us, borrowing the words of American civil rights leader Reverend Martin Luther King: "We shall match your capacity to inflict suffering by our capacity to endure suffering. We shall meet your physical force with soul force. Do to us what you will, and we shall continue to love you. We cannot in all good conscience obey your unjust laws because noncooperation with evil is as much a moral obligation as is cooperation with good. Throw us in jail and we shall still love you."
Peace be with me and my family, with Your Honour, and with the people of Hong Kong. There are no thugs, only tyranny; five demands, not one less! To god be the glory and to people be the glory!
The Fifth Defendant
Wong Ho Ming
19 August 2021
lost king 在 Milton Goh Blog and Sermon Notes Facebook 的最佳解答
Restoration for your Own Mistakes
Perhaps you are thinking, “Yes I know I can expect restoration when the devil attacks me or if I am persecuted. But I am suffering now because of my own mistake. Surely I cannot expect God to restore me? I will have to suffer and pay for my mistake.”
Well, the Gospel of Jesus Christ is called the good news because it is really undeserved favor. Even if you are suffering losses from your own mistakes, you can still expect to receive restoration that is better in quality and/or quantity than before.
I know it sounds too good to be true, but I am not just making that up. Look at Abraham’s story. He told his wife Sarah to lie to everyone in Gerar that she was only his sister.
He did this because Sarah had been renewed in her youth and was exceedingly beautiful. Abraham was afraid that if the people knew that she was his wife, they would kill him and take her for themselves.
After hearing that Sarah was only Abraham’s sister, the king of Gerar, Abimelech, took Sarah into his harem.
Reading this story, it is clear that Abraham is the one at fault. He lied that Sarah was only his sister, and his lies stemmed from cowardice and self-preservation, endangering Sarah’s chastity.
Yet, when God wanted to save Sarah from being violated, He threatened Abimelech and his family with death if he decided not to restore Sarah to Abraham.
“God said to him in the dream, “Yes, I know that in the integrity of your heart you have done this, and I also withheld you from sinning against me. Therefore I didn’t allow you to touch her. Now therefore, restore the man’s wife. For he is a prophet, and he will pray for you, and you will live. If you don’t restore her, know for sure that you will die, you, and all who are yours.”” (Genesis 20:6-7 WEB)
Shouldn’t it be Abraham who was threatened with death for his cowardice and lies? This is God’s Grace towards the righteous ones who are justified by faith. Even if you make a mistake, God is not punishing you for your sins—His heart is to restore you for the negative consequences of your wrong actions.
What does restore “the man’s wife” mean? Is it just to give Sarah back to Abraham? Let us examine what Abimelech did:
“Abimelech took sheep and cattle, male servants and female servants, and gave them to Abraham, and restored Sarah, his wife, to him. Abimelech said, “Behold, my land is before you. Dwell where it pleases you.” To Sarah he said, “Behold, I have given your brother a thousand pieces of silver. Behold, it is for you a covering of the eyes to all that are with you. In front of all you are vindicated.”” (Genesis 20:14-16 WEB)
Wow, instead of just giving Sarah back to Abraham, Abimelech gave sheep, cattle, servants, land and a thousand pieces of silver to Abraham. Even though Abraham was the originator of the problem, he was enriched through his mistake.
This is what God’s restoration looks like. You never just get the same thing back. It will always be better in quality and/or quantity when He restores you for your losses.
Even though Abraham made mistakes in his life, he had a great relationship with God, such that the Scriptures call him “a friend of God”. Whenever God appeared and spoke to him, he paid attention, delighting in the words and meditated on them.
An example of this would be God’s promise to him that he would have a son who was born of Sarah. Abraham never gave up on that promise, and eventually, he received the fulfillment of it.
“Blessed is the man who doesn’t walk in the counsel of the wicked, nor stand on the path of sinners, nor sit in the seat of scoffers; but his delight is in Yahweh’s law. On his law he meditates day and night. He will be like a tree planted by the streams of water, that produces its fruit in its season, whose leaf also does not wither. Whatever he does shall prosper.” (Psalms 1:1-3 WEB)
Although we are born-again and our spirits are righteous, holy and perfect like Jesus, we still live in this body of sinful flesh. Sometimes we get confused, thinking that the fleshly impulses and thoughts are our own. This causes us to make mistakes.
However, if you have a heart for God’s word like Abraham did, even the mistakes you unwittingly make will prosper. What you did may not be good, but God can still turn things around for your good because He is for you, not against you. Since you are righteous in Christ, you can expect to receive restoration for your losses, even if they were caused by your own mistakes!
Learn God’s plan to prosper you in all things through His restoration. If you have lost in any way, you can expect to gain much more/better back. This eBook, “All Things Made New”, may be the most comprehensive book about God’s restoration:
https://bit.ly/prosper-through-restoration
lost king 在 translation Youtube 的最佳解答
#'93年にサンソフト、東海エンジニアリングが開発、サンソフトが発売した、SFC用シミュレーションRPG作であり、シリーズの第一作目。
企画では主人公がメカであったが結局ファンタジーに落ち着いた。また、森達男氏はセガのG-LOCのシステムにかなり影響を受け製作に取り組んだ。
基本はターン制STRのシステムを持ちながら、HEXフィールドマップ上を戦闘・移動し進む。しかしパーティの4人のキャラは完全にバラバラに行動可能な為、例え1人が別の場所に居ようがターン終了等も可能。
戦闘演出のテンポもよく、戦闘アニメも邪魔にならない。
「中学生の頃から自分のゲームを作りたいという夢を叶えた」と言うプロデューサー及びプログラマーの渥美博明氏は、"1"だけが本当のアルバートと述べる程、続編以降に関わった際に心身共に疲弊したそうだ。
EDについても素直にハッピーエンドなんて認めん、という気持ちで作ったらしい。
BGMはへべれけ(FC/'91年)や、バットマン(FC/'89年)等の小高氏が作曲を行った。
ドライバ作成:塚本浩氏
作曲:小高直樹氏
Manufacture: 1993.03.05 Sun Soft / Tokai Engineering
Hardware: spc700
computer: super famicom / snes
music driver programmer: Hiroshi Tsukamoto
composer: Naoki Kodaka
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
00:00 01.Memories of the Past (過去の記憶)
02:07 02.The Other Side of Reminiscence (追憶の彼方)
03:16 03.Beyond the Empty Space (虚空の彼方へ)
03:39 04.An Offering to the Holy King Gort (神聖王ゴートに捧ぐ)
05:52 05.Gathering of Comrades (同志集いて)
06:04 06.Hometown Tibelis (チベリス我が故郷)
09:17 07.On Holy Ground (勇者のゆく道)
10:34 08.Fine Goods (買い物上手)
11:37 09.The Road Walked by Heroes (勇者のゆく道)
14:13 10.Brimming Strength (みなぎる力)
14:21 11.Roar of the Beast (魔獣の咆哮)
15:42 12.Fire Raid (襲撃の炎)
17:02 13.At the Base of Gort's Flag (ゴートの旗のもとに)
18:42 14.Goodnight, Sophia (おやすみソフィア)
19:21 15.Take a Rest (お疲れさま)
19:24 16.Clouds Riding the Wind (風に乗る雲)
21:19 17.We're Cheerful Workers! (おれたちゃ陽気な労働者!)
23:26 18.In a Strange New World (異郷の地にて)
25:13 19.Lovers' Dirge (恋人たちの追悼歌)
27:34 20.Proof of Mania (マニアの証明)
27:47 21.Sleeping World (眠れる大地)
29:22 22.Stir of Sorcery (魔導の胎動)
30:28 23.To a New World (新たな大地へ)
30:53 24.Mysterious Garden (不思議の園)
31:30 25.World of Twilight
34:54 26.Lovely Faeries (麗しき妖精たちよ)
36:30 27.Lost in the Darkness (暗闇の迷走)
38:34 28.A Faint Glimmer (ささやかな光)
38:43 29.Temple of the Demon God (魔王の神殿)
40:05 30.Messenger at the Lunatic Banquet (狂宴の使者)
41:05 31.Until My Life Comes to an End (この命尽きるまで)
43:09 32.Song of Reposing Souls_ Warrior's Headstone (鎮魂歌:戦士の墓標)
43:37 33.Anthem of a New Hero (新たな英雄の賛歌)
46:05 34.Someday, Once More Will He... (いつかまた…)
46:16 35.Sunsoft (サンソフトロゴ)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
lost king 在 KAZBOM Youtube 的最佳解答
THE FIRST TAKE 自2019年底出現在YouTube上,相信喜歡聽日本音樂的人對這個頻道一定不陌生。但你有想過,THE FIRST TAKE 背後的公司是誰?又為什麼可以請到這麼多歌手的嗎?
「THE FIRST TAKE」頻道傳送門
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC9zY_E8mcAo_Oq772LEZq8Q
「With ensemble」頻道傳送門
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQ_mSPgtaXmpsi7iBZ6322Q
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・
影片時間軸
0:00 開頭介紹
1:38 THE FIRST TAKE是如何誕生的?
2:43 THE FIRST TAKE真的只給歌手們一次錄音機會嗎?
3:27 THE FIRST TAKE背後的公司是誰?
4:10 為什麼THE FIRST TAKE的影片縮圖都有一條線?
5:11 THE FIRST TAKE為什麼可以這麼好聽?
7:15 THE FIRST TAKE讓歌手選歌的標準是什麼?
7:50 因應疫情,所產生的THE HOME TAKE
8:39 不只找歌手唱歌,還有選秀、音樂祭跟Podcast
9:40 交響樂版本的THE FIRST TAKE誕生?「With ensemble」
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・
■ 卡滋蹦 / KAZBOM
・ Instagram:https://www.instagram.com/kazbomyi1130/
・ Facebook:https://www.facebook.com/kazbomyi1130/
・ KKBOX:https://kkbox.fm/l2POfG
-
This channel is only used to recommending music,band and artist
All the videos are not intending to against copyright law, only to assisting commentary and recommendation.
If it cause any lost of yours, please contact me immediately.
このチャンネルでは、 主に音楽、バント、歌手、邦楽の推奨や評価などしております。
本チャンネル管理者は、本チャンネルにて推奨・評価する画像・音楽データ等(著作物)が作成者(著作権者)のものであることを認め深く尊重しており、侵害する気は一切ございません。
万が一、著作権などの侵害を感じられた場合、また質問やお気付きの点などがございましたら、下記のメールアドレスへご連絡ください。
Email:kazbomyi1130@gmail.com
#KAZBOM #THEFIRSTTAKE
lost king 在 HEBEFACE Youtube 的最佳貼文
今早起床的時候,看到有觀眾tag我,在「文人多說話」的群組裡,有人問了關於《嫁個有錢人》電影場景,我絕對不是專家,我只是比較有空,而且我集中做這件事情,所以大家都說,不如找我吧...好!今天先來找找《嫁個有錢人》的電影場景。經過石澳,必要看看喜劇之王的經典場景,颱風山竹早年吹襲香港,破壞了沿岸的東西,《喜劇之王》拍攝場景修復多時仍未重新開放。
電影:嫁個有錢人 (Marry A Rich Man)
出品公司:嘉禾電影(中國)有限公司
電影:喜劇之王 (King of Comedy)
製片商:星輝海外有限公司
**已獲HMVOD授權使用電影畫面**
鳴謝:HMVOD (hmvod.com.hk)
►Subscribe - @hebeface _
?Facebook - @igamershebe _
?Instagram - @Hebeface _
香港不是一個製作者追夢的地方,如果你認為我的製作值得你支持,
可以選擇成為頻道會員,彌補製作上的開支:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCr9O9uLhxnB5GQenVseEAnA/join
MUSIC: lost time - Lofi Hip Hop Beat
LINK: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5xUVDz5ha5U
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2u4ZS7R
Apple Music: https://apple.co/2GIxb8j