Discovering the truth behind President Tsai Ing-wen’s thesis is the responsibility of intellectuals and the media. Six months ago, prosecutors sought to charge Professor Hwan C. Lin, Professor Ho De-fen, and Dr. Dennis Peng with defamation. It was the first time an acting president brought forth a lawsuit against scholars.
For two years, anyone who doubted Tsai Ing-wen’s thesis, or even questioned it, were ridiculed by the media and legally persecuted. But, aren’t government leaders in a democratic society obligated to have the authenticity of their credentials tested? Why does the opposite prevail in Taiwan? Why can a leader who has their credentials questioned forgo providing proof and can, instead, use the judicial system to suppress those that question them?
The hallmark of a dutiful scholar is how willing they are to uphold academic integrity. A desire to authenticate Tsai’s degree is a basic reaction for anyone who considers themselves part of the academic circle. However, after Tsai sought legal action against the three scholars, the public came to understand that “questioning Tsai’s degree will get you sued.” Such a precedent is an affront to academic integrity, and an insult to intellectuals everywhere.
Can Taiwan deem itself a proud democracy if its head of state is allowed to use privilege to elevate themselves their whole life, and then escape criticism when questioned? Can Taiwan say it’s the proud democracy it claims to be when judicial mechanisms are used to enact acts of academic fraud? Martial law has been abolished for decades, and yet this country still operates like a dictatorship. Today is about transitional justice in the academic realm. Transitional justice begins when we can face our mistakes. Here, justice begins when Tsai faces her own academic fraud.
Today’s press conference is about rallying the public to stand up against authoritarianism. We call on Tsai Ing-wen to do her duty as head of state and divulge the truth about her thesis. If she refuses to do so, then the other purpose of today is to reveal the evidence we have found that uncovers that truth.
It’s time the lies ended. We will hold a press conference at the Legislative Yuan tomorrow at 10:30 a.m. Eat News will broadcast the entire event live: https://www.eatnews.co.uk/video/20210909-1/
#DennisPeng #PengWengjen #HwanCLin #HoDefen #TsaiIngwen #LSEThesisGateScandal
同時也有4部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過75萬的網紅志祺七七 X 圖文不符,也在其Youtube影片中提到,✔︎ 成為七七會員(幫助我們繼續日更,並享有會員專屬福利):http://bit.ly/shasha77_member ✔︎ 體驗志祺七七文章版:https://blog.simpleinfo.cc/shasha77 ✔︎ 購買黃臭泥周邊商品: https://reurl.cc/Ezkbma 💛 ✔...
「life after democracy」的推薦目錄:
- 關於life after democracy 在 Facebook 的精選貼文
- 關於life after democracy 在 Facebook 的精選貼文
- 關於life after democracy 在 葉慶元律師(葉狀師) Facebook 的精選貼文
- 關於life after democracy 在 志祺七七 X 圖文不符 Youtube 的最佳解答
- 關於life after democracy 在 Ghost Island Media 鬼島之音 Youtube 的最讚貼文
- 關於life after democracy 在 Jackz Youtube 的最佳貼文
- 關於life after democracy 在 After Democracy: what now? - VPRO documentary - 2010 的評價
life after democracy 在 Facebook 的精選貼文
//An activist detained under Hong Kong’s national security law is planning to apply to the High Court to lift restrictions on the media’s reporting of her bail hearing on Wednesday.
In a message published on Tuesday, Gwyneth Ho argued that laws banning the media from reporting details of bail hearings failed to protect the interests of the accused. The press should be allowed to freely report what happened during those hearings, she said.
“After the defendants under the national security law were arrested and remanded in custody, the reporting restrictions on bail hearings have turned the process into a ‘black box’, and has created widespread fears in society,” she wrote.
“The public has no way of knowing the contents of the bail hearings under the national security law, especially the evidence used by the prosecutors and the courts’ assessment of the defendants.”
Ho is among 47 democracy figures charged with conspiracy to commit subversion, which carries a maximum sentence of life in prison. They are accused of plotting to subvert state power via an informal primary poll held last July. Only 13 of the 47 have been granted bail since early March.
After being detained for more than six months, Ho will make her bail application at the High Court on Wednesday morning.
She publicised her arguments a day in advance, saying the reporting restrictions set out under section 9P of the Criminal Procedure Ordinance were originally meant to ensure that defendants received a fair trial. The law limits media coverage of bail hearings to basic information such as the defendant’s name, the court’s decision and bail conditions.
Those regulations backfired because the lack of transparency had caused the public to doubt whether the national security law had been fairly implemented, Ho wrote, adding that Hong Kong society was worried about arbitrary arrests based on flimsy evidence.
“In reality, the reporting restrictions benefit the Department of Justice, as it no longer needs to publicly explain the basis of the charges and various political accusations,” she wrote.
“The restrictions have clearly contravened the principle of public justice, and if the courts still refuse to lift them, the public will inevitably suspect that the courts accept this unfair situation.”
The open administration of justice was a fundamental principle of Hong Kong’s common law system, and courts should be scrutinised by the public and the press, Ho said, quoting the city’s former chief justice Denys Roberts.
Hong Kong courts have mostly kept reporting restrictions in place for bail applications under the national security law, though some judges have issued written rulings explaining their decision to grant or refuse bail, which are typically published after a delay.
Earlier on Tuesday, the court again denied the bail application of former pro-democracy lawmaker Gary Fan, a co-defendant in the subversion case. Like most of the 47, Fan has been in custody for months with no trial date lined up as yet.
By Holmes Chan//
life after democracy 在 葉慶元律師(葉狀師) Facebook 的精選貼文
#一兆美元基礎建設法案過關
拜登的 #一兆美元基礎建設法案,獲得參議院跨黨派議員支持,以69比30的票數,得以快速通過。
值得注意的是,包括共和黨參議院領袖 Mitch McConnell 也投下贊成票,顯示了提升美國基礎建設,並且透過公共建設振興美國經濟,已經成為跨黨派的共識(美國的基礎建設,實在是……)。
在這個斥資一兆美元的基礎建設法案之後,拜登另外還提出了三兆六千億美元的社會福利法案,主要在於提升幼兒、老人照護。此一法案是否能再度獲得共和黨議員支持,值得關注。
---
With a robust vote after weeks of fits and starts, the Senate approved a $1 trillion infrastructure plan for states coast to coast on Tuesday, as a rare coalition of Democrats and Republicans joined together to overcome skeptics and deliver a cornerstone of President Joe Biden’s agenda.
“Today, we proved that democracy can still work,” Biden declared at the White House, noting that the 69-30 vote included even Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell.
“We can still come together to do big things, important things, for the American people,” Biden said.
The overwhelming tally provided fresh momentum for the first phase of Biden’s “Build Back Better” priorities, now heading to the House. A sizable number of lawmakers showed they were willing to set aside partisan pressures, at least for a moment, eager to send billions to their states for rebuilding roads, broadband internet, water pipes and the public works systems that underpin much of American life.
The vote also set the stage for a much more contentious fight over Biden’s bigger $3.5 trillion package that is next up in the Senate — a more liberal undertaking of child care, elder care and other programs that is much more partisan and expected to draw only Democratic support. That debate is expected to extend into the fall.
https://apnews.com/article/senate-infrastructure-bill-politics-joe-biden-a431f8c9f3f113b661cb3526512fc4e0
life after democracy 在 志祺七七 X 圖文不符 Youtube 的最佳解答
✔︎ 成為七七會員(幫助我們繼續日更,並享有會員專屬福利):http://bit.ly/shasha77_member
✔︎ 體驗志祺七七文章版:https://blog.simpleinfo.cc/shasha77
✔︎ 購買黃臭泥周邊商品: https://reurl.cc/Ezkbma 💛
✔︎ 訂閱志祺七七頻道: http://bit.ly/shasha77_subscribe
✔︎ 追蹤志祺IG :https://www.instagram.com/shasha77.daily
✔︎ 來看志祺七七粉專 :http://bit.ly/shasha77_fb
✔︎ 如果不便加入會員,也可從這裡贊助我們:https://bit.ly/support-shasha77
(請記得在贊助頁面留下您的email,以便我們寄送發票。若遇到金流問題,麻煩請聯繫:service@simpleinfo.cc)
#海地 #海地總統
各節重點:
00:00 前導
01:09「志祺七七的商業合作方案」廣告段落
02:10 發生了什麼事?
03:28 誰殺了海地總統?
04:39 為什麼要暗殺總統?
06:50 接下來怎麼辦?
08:20 海地是什麼樣的國家?
09:23 我們的觀點
10:40 提問
10:58 結尾
【 製作團隊 】
|企劃:關節
|腳本:關節
|編輯:土龍
|剪輯後製:Pookie
|剪輯助理:歆雅
|演出:志祺
——
【 本集參考資料 】
→Haiti president's assassination: What we know so far:https://bbc.in/3eoXaBO
→Exclusive: A wild chase followed the assassination of Haiti's President:https://cnn.it/3eq8bTo
→海地總統莫伊茲遇刺身亡 政局前景充滿變數:https://bbc.in/36Mm0Hj
→Haiti on Brink of Anarchy Amid Hunger, Gang Violence and Power Vacuum:https://on.wsj.com/3z2A4bP
→Two Haitian Adversaries Vying for Power Are Negotiating to Bring Stability, Elections:https://on.wsj.com/3epvn3X
→Haiti Authorities Intensify Manhunt After President Jovenel Moïse’s Assassination:https://on.wsj.com/3wKH3F0
→海地臨時總統鬧雙包?參院議長、代理總理搶上位:https://bit.ly/3xOd5RJ
→殺死海地總統的「美國人」?被俘的海裔美籍刺客與傭兵:https://bit.ly/3xK24AJ
→誰殺死了海地總統?刺殺摩伊士的「外籍傭兵團」遭圍殲生俘:https://bit.ly/3z7uuF5
→25 Years After 'Operation Uphold Democracy,' Experts Say the Oft-Forgotten U.S. Military Intervention Still Shapes Life in Haiti:https://bit.ly/3esguhk
→Wikipedia: History of Haiti:https://bit.ly/3reLff0
→Wikipedia: Jovenel Moïse:https://bit.ly/3wTSCdb
→我駐海地大使館遇襲細節曝光!警衛躲車內助逮11名嫌犯:https://bit.ly/3wERxFH
→Slaying creates 3-way rivalry in Haiti:https://bit.ly/3wTSCKd
→Haiti’s Political and Economic Conditions:https://bit.ly/3ikeEQM
\每週7天,每天7點,每次7分鐘,和我們一起了解更多有趣的生活議題吧!/
🥁七七仔們如果想寄東西關懷七七團隊與志祺,傳送門如下:
106台北市大安區羅斯福路二段111號8樓
🟢如有引用本頻道影片與相關品牌識別素材,請遵循此規範:http://bit.ly/shasha77_authorization
🟡如有業務需求,請洽:hi77@simpleinfo.cc
🔴如果影片內容有誤,歡迎來信勘誤:hey77@simpleinfo.cc
life after democracy 在 Ghost Island Media 鬼島之音 Youtube 的最讚貼文
Digital Minister and self-taught coding whiz Audrey Tang shares her unconventional life story – from gender identity to hacktivism, why she chose the name “Audrey 唐鳳,” and what conservative anarchism means to her.
Having come of age together with Taiwanese democracy and the Internet, Tang relates how she took her education online after dropping out of junior high. Since then, Tang has striven to make knowledge as accessible, transparent, and collaborative as possible. She explains how open data initiatives (e.g. vTaiwan, g0v) can help citizens build consensus, participate in the legislative process, and ultimately, govern themselves.
Today’s episode is hosted by J.R. Wu - Chief of the Secretariat for INDSR (Institute for National Defense and Security Research) in Taiwan. Wu is a former journalist with nearly two decades of media experience in the US and Asia. She has led news bureaus for Reuters and Dow Jones.
Support us on Patreon:
http://patreon.com/taiwan
Follow us on Twitter:
https://twitter.com/ghostislandme
SHOW CREDIT
Emily Y. Wu (Producer)
https://twitter.com/emilyywu
JR Wu (Host)
Sam Robbins (Researcher)
https://twitter.com/helloitissam
Alice Yeh (Researcher)
Yu-Chen Lai (Researcher)
https://twitter.com/aGuavaEmoji
A Ghost Island Media production
https://twitter.com/ghostislandme
www.ghostisland.media
MB01O2EJOJJSZK2
life after democracy 在 Jackz Youtube 的最佳貼文
Watch Common Talks About Hong Kong After Winning Best Original Song | Oscars 2015:
http://youtu.be/5jcDMvgcPOo
Common started off the moving speech:
First off, I’d like to thank God that lives in us all. Recently, John and I got to go to Selma and perform “Glory” on the same bridge that Dr. King and the people of the civil rights movement marched on 50 years ago. This bridge was once a landmark of a divided nation, but now is a symbol for change. The spirit of this bridge transcends race, gender, religion, sexual orientation, and social status. The spirit of this bridge connects the kid from the South side of Chicago, dreaming of a better life to those in France standing up for their freedom of expression to the people in Hong Kong protesting for democracy. This bridge was built on hope. Welded with compassion. And elevated by love for all human beings.
Then Legend took to the microphone, building off those sentiments:
Thank you. Nina Simone said it’s an artist’s duty to reflect the times in which we live. We wrote this song for a film that was based on events that were 50 years ago, but we say Selma is now, because the struggle for justice is right now. We know that the voting rights, the act that they fought for 50 years ago is being compromised right now in this country today. We know that right now the struggle for freedom and justice is real. We live in the most incarcerated country in the world. There are more black men under correctional control today than were under slavery in 1850. When people are marching with our song, we want to tell you that we are with you, we see you, we love you, and march on.
Transcript Of John Legend & Common's Oscar Acceptance Speech Proves "Glory" Has A Timeless Message
by SAMANTHA RULLO
@SAMRULLO
Source: http://www.bustle.com/articles/65840-transcript-of-john-legend-commons-oscar-acceptance-speech-proves-glory-has-a-timeless-message-video
Help us caption & translate this video!
http://amara.org/v/W8n6/
life after democracy 在 After Democracy: what now? - VPRO documentary - 2010 的美食出口停車場
... <看更多>