Nearly 200 Hong Kong police officers searched the Apple Daily office in Tseung Kwan O after Jimmy Lai, founder of its publisher Next Digital, was arrested over alleged foreign collusion under the city’s new national security law.
The police team arrived at the newspaper’s office building at around 10 a.m. An Apple Daily reporter who was present said the police did not show any search warrant. The reporter also said that the legal grounds for the search were uncertain.
But the police said on their Facebook page that officers had arrived at the premises of the newspaper with a search warrant to investigate alleged crimes undermining national security. Officers showed and explained the details of the search warrant to employees at the building and asked for their cooperation, according to the social media post.
Lai later appeared at the Apple Daily office at about 10:55 a.m under the custody of police. He was handcuffed with his arms held behind. As he went inside a bathroom, some 50 police officers stood guard outside and cordoned off the area.
Police also cordoned off the office premises, blocking other journalists as well as most Apple Daily staffers from entering, although some Apple Daily journalists who were already in the office were allowed to remain inside to record the goings-on. Officers were seen flipping through documents lying on employees’ desks.
The 71-year-old Lai, his sons Timothy and Ian, and several members of the senior management of Next Media were arrested on Monday morning on suspicion of violating Article 29 of the national security law, which prohibits collusion with foreign forces, and other alleged offenses. Lai was taken away at 9:45 a.m from his home at Kadoorie Avenue in Kowloon.
A total of seven people were arrested in the morning, sources said, including Royston Chow, Next Digital’s group chief operating officer, chief financial officer and executive director, who was led at around 10 a.m. from his home in South Horizons, Ap Lei Chau.
facebook security officer 在 黃之鋒 Joshua Wong Facebook 的最佳貼文
#國際記者會 [On LegCo Disqualification: a Prelude to National Security Law Witch-hunt]
1/ The HK-style Election has never been free & fair’ since 2016, when candidates like Edward Leung, Nathan Law, Agnes Chow and me were disqualified one by one from the election.
2/ Today, with their sweepingly arbitrary power, Electoral Officers have extended their political vetting also to my friends like Gywneth Ho, Tiffany Yuen, Lester Shum, other pan-democrats. Beyond any doubt, it is the most scandalous election fraud ever in HK history.
3/ Before going through Ms CHOI’s witch-hunt decision, I wish to emphasize that no reasonable man would think that this election ban is not politically-driven. Beijing had staged multiple acts to prevent the opposition bloc from taking the majority in LegCo.
4/ Beijing could disqualify us, arrest us and threw us into jail, they could even call off the election and create a puppet parliament elsewhere. However, none of these can overturn the strong mandate of 610,000 HKers who had cast their ballots the city's first-ever primaries.
5/ Our voice is clear to the world, we stand to defend our freedom and rights that stipulated in the Joint Declaration. Barring me from running the election would not stop our cause for democracy, even though they may soon declare democratic aspirations illegal under the new law.
6/ Excuses used to rule my nomination this time are proved invalid and ridiculous. Ms Alice CHOI, the Returning Officer cited obsolete statements by Demosisto and selectively framed them as my personal belief, regardless of the fact that Demosisto was disbanded a month ago.
7/ Demosisto was not even promoting self-determination since Jan. The government also said, by engaging in international exchanges and advocacy work, I continue to ‘solicit interference by foreign governments’ in HK’s internal affairs.
8/ Needless to say, opposing the National Security Law is framed as not ‘supporting, promoting and embracing’ the Basic Law. Voting against government proposals and bills is considered as paralysing the government.
9/ Nonetheless, the decision is far more than depriving my right to political participation. This 18-page decision contains a lot of fabricated allegations that could be used as offences under the National Security Law.
10/ Choi cited my recent Facebook post ten days after the NSL was in force, claiming that I have the intention to continue to solicit interference by foreign governments’. To make it clear, it was definitely a misrepresentation because the post was merely a commentary of news.
11/ I have to take steps to refute such false allegations, as we all know National Security Law is actually a legal weapon used against dissidents. Two days ago Tony Chung and three other students were arrested on inciting secession for online speeches.
12/ The special judges who oversee National Security Law cases are directly appointed by Carrie Lam. From making up evidence, arrest, prosecution and trial, the administration can control almost every procedure the law requires.
13/ If the slanderous operation of the government is tolerated and not refuted, I believe I would be given no chance of defence when I’m arrested. Lastly, I wish to thank all voters who entrusted my political belief and generously gave nominations to support my campaign.
14/ Our resistance will continue on and we hope the world can stand with us in the upcoming uphill battle! To support our fight for the city’s future, I have opened a new Patreon account to share my thoughts on HK’s future. Please support me: https://www.patreon.com/posts/39911873
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_2vvTdQfFm0
facebook security officer 在 方志恒 Brian Fong Facebook 的最讚貼文
【#香港研究HKStudies】前皇家警官Martin Purbrick在《亞洲事務》發表研究文章,探討香港流水革命的因由,並重點分析由於失去民眾支持,警察的準軍事體制將無法平息示威。這應該是首篇有關香港流水革命的學術文章,值得一讀。
Former Royal Hong Kong Police officer Martin Purbrick has published a research paper in Asian Affairs, examining the causes of Hong Kong's Water Revolution. The article looks at the paramilitary internal security mode of the police, arguing that without the support of the majority of the community such a paramilitary mode is ineffective to address the protests. It should be the first academic paper on Water Revolution, worth reading.
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/03068374.2019.1672397
Abstract:This article is written by a former Royal Hong Kong Police officer whose service included Special Branch engaged in counter-terrorism intelligence, and who is currently resident in Hong Kong. It offers a detailed chronological overview of the development of the 2019 protests in Hong Kong; analyses the problems with the political response on the part of the Hong Kong and Beijing governments; it also looks at the tactics employed by the protesters, and critically examines the tactical and strategic response to the protests by the Hong Kong police. It also discusses the broader social and economic causes of the protests, and how the Hong Kong government might best respond to these challenges
#香港研究 #香港研究學院 #香港研究在世界 #HongKongStudies #WorldingHongKongStudies
------------------------------
Follow me in social media
------------------------------
1. Facebook: facebook.com/brianfonghk
2. Instagram: instagram.com/brianfonghk
3. Twitter: twitter.com/brianfonghk
4. Medium: medium.com/@brianfonghk
5. Telegram: t.me/brianfonghk