#國民黨把蔡英文比成毛澤東
#丟臉丟到全世界去!😡
國民黨在推特官方帳號上放出一張將總統蔡英文 Tsai Ing-wen繪製成毛澤東的圖片,佩芬今天以民進黨發言人的身分表示,#蔡英文是民選總統,#毛澤東是獨裁者,如何類比?推特是全球網友慣用的社群平台,國民黨將國內政治鬥爭拿到推特上,還遭外媒批評,真是丟臉丟到全世界去!
許多網友在國民黨的推文下留言嘲諷,華爾街日報、彭博社等國際媒體的記者更點名批評,甚至法國智庫的學者直說國民黨「可悲」,並建議國民黨應該「了解自己的歷史多一點,並負責任一點」,可見國民黨不但是鬧了國際笑話,更是丟盡民主國家的臉。
在所有民主國家,不論是政府機關,還是政黨組織,像推特這樣國際社群平台,主要的功能是讓國際社會能更認識、了解自己的立場,但似乎 #只有國民黨反其道而行,#把國際社群平台拿來做負面鬥爭的工具,如今還以獨裁者比喻台灣的民選總統,讓人看得真替他們感到不好意思!
* * *
KMT's recent tweet illustrates President Tsai Ing-wen as Mao Zedong. The analogy does not make any sense given that President Tsai is an elected president, whereas Mao Zedong was a dictator. That the KMT brought up the domestic political struggle between parties to the international stage is undoubtedly humiliating.
The KMT's act is unbelievably reckless. The public has expressed their concerns toward the tweet: netizens have ridiculed in the comment section, and reporters from international media such as Washington Post and Bloomberg have also commented on this tweet. What's more, Antoine Bondaz, a research fellow at the Foundation for Strategic Research and heads the FRS-KF Korea Programme on Security and Diplomacy in France, suggested that KMT's act is "pathetic" and that the KMT should "know [its] own history and be a little bit more responsible."
Around the world, Twitter is mainly used to express their ideas and positions for a country or its political parties. However, the KMT seems to act reversely, using it to inflict conflicts and struggles. More so, the KMT even used a ridiculous illustration to denounce Taiwan’s democratically-elected President. KMT’s irresponsible act truly embarrasses Taiwan.
* * *
💟 追蹤佩芬的IG:
https://www.instagram.com/peifen_hsieh/
💚 成為佩芬的Line好友:
https://line.me/R/ti/p/%40896dvscg
「be responsible for意思」的推薦目錄:
be responsible for意思 在 浩爾譯世界 Facebook 的精選貼文
【每日國際選讀】
#文末挑戰多益選擇題📝
覺得自己好廢?
別慌!大器晚成才是常態
開啟「接收通知」和「搶先看」每天吸收雙語時事新知
來讀華爾街日報獨家
🔥It’s Never Too Late to Start a Brilliant Career
別捧少年成名,開竅永遠不嫌晚
🏆Today we are madly obsessed with early achievement. We celebrate those who explode out of the gates, who scorch the SAT, get straight A’s in AP courses, win a spot at Harvard or Stanford, get a first job at Google or Goldman Sachs, and headline those ubiquitous 30-under-30 lists.
如今我們瘋狂追捧着年少成名的故事。我們推崇那些從起跑線開始就一路領先的天才,他們高分搞定SAT,用無數的A串起成績單,獲得哈佛或者斯坦福的錄取名額,畢業之後第一份工作就入職google或者高盛,並且登上那些漫天飛舞的“30位30歲以下的俊傑”榜單。
👀But precocious achievement is the exception, not the norm. The fact is, we mature and develop at different rates. All of us will have multiple cognitive peaks throughout our lives, and the talents and passions that we have to offer can emerge across a range of personal circumstances, not just in formal educational settings focused on a few narrow criteria of achievement. Late bloomers are everywhere once you know to look for them.
然而年少成名的案例注定是個例,而非常態。每個人發展成熟的速度是不一樣的,我們人生中都會有數個認知水平的巔峰期,並且我們的才能和熱情也會在各種各樣的個人境遇中得到激發和釋放。正式的教育流程着眼於用很少的幾項評判標準來選拔優秀人才,因此並不是所有人都得在那個體系裡一展宏圖。如果你仔細找找的話,你的身邊一定有許多大器晚成的人。
🗣Recent research suggests that we need to modify our understanding of how people mature from adolescence to adulthood. Between the ages of 18 and 25, most people are still living in a volatile post-adolescence. In both adolescent and young adult brains, the prefrontal cortex—the processing center of our frontal lobe—is the last part to fully develop, and it is responsible for complex functions such as planning and organizing, problem solving, memory, attention and inhibition.
我們此前用於定義青少年長大成人的標準,也許需要修正一下。最近的研究表明,大多數18-25歲之間的人群仍然處於情緒波動較大的“後青春期“,青少年和年輕人的大腦中,額葉的資訊處理中心——前額葉皮質是最晚發展完全的部分,而前額葉皮質所負責的是人的計劃及組織能力、問題解決能力、記憶力、注意力和自控能力。
💡 💡💡 今日讀報記起來 💡💡💡
-out of the gates: 一開始;打從最一開始
-scorch: 燒、烤焦;文中引申為在考試中以優越能力拿高分的意思
-ubiquitous: 無所不在
-precocious: 早熟;過早的
-personal circumstances: 個人際遇
-late bloomer: 大器晚成的人
-modify: 改變;修正
-volatile: 起伏大的;動盪的
-inhibition: 抑制;克制
未完待續...
各年齡階段的大腦會發展什麼能力呢?
加入文末每日國際選讀計畫,解鎖完整語音導讀版
——
原文連結請看留言
——
❓❓多益模擬題❓:
We live in a society where people are obsessed with _____________ achievement. But such obsession should be ____________ in that studies have shown that throughout our lives, we will have multiple cognitive peaks, only that people mature and develop at different rates.
🙋🏻♀️🙋🏼♀️
A. precocious / modify
B. precautious / modified
C. precocious / modified
-
【每日國際選讀,熱烈招生中!】
華爾街日報訂閱超值方案📰
專屬#臉書社團,浩爾 #每日語音導讀
「留言+1」,就送你 #優惠碼 及 #導讀試聽!
#覺得自己小時了了的點哈
#覺得自己大器晚成點愛心
#覺得自己穩定成長點加油
#以下開放補充說明
be responsible for意思 在 Follow XiaoFei 跟著小飛玩 Facebook 的最佳解答
實際發生的情況 VS 外人所看到的情況。
昨天我發布了跳水影片,這似乎使人們感到惱火。許多人認為這樣的發文是煽動危險的行為。
“很糟糕的示範,無知的人會跟著模仿然後發生意外而死”
為什麼總是別人表現得不負責任?
從來沒有人評論說“我可能會反覆跳水而死去?”
為什麼別人如此不信任?
是什麼讓您的判斷比其他所有人的判斷要好得多?
人們不必擔心觀看影片然後再重複播放。如果您相信這樣的人的存在,那麼“玩命關頭”的電影會讓您太害怕不敢離開家了,以免擔心遇到魯莽的駕駛員。
該影片用手機高影格率(慢動作)拍攝。長時間的飛行使它看起來像是跳得很高,但實際高度只有6.5公尺高。
雖然不是特別高,但是如果您背部落水或腹部落水,這種高度可能還是會覺得很痛。
我會知道,是因為我不擅長做後空翻,但無論如何我還是會嘗試。肚子落水上並不是致命的,但這也不是一件好事。
這就是為什麼我影片裡跳水方式都是伸直雙腳,雙手臂擺放在身體兩側。實際上,這是一個很好的動作示範。
我總是告訴人們在跳水之前檢查水的深度,並確保水中沒有障礙物。
但是當我們說“跳前先看一看”時,我們真正的意思是“在你行動前要先思考”。
爬上平台有風險嗎?
我要從穩定平台上跳下來嗎?
我的計劃著陸區在哪裡?
著陸區中是否有人或物體?
水的深度適合從這個高度跳嗎?
跳躍時我會在空中做什麼?
我計劃著陸的方向是什麼?
我可以在這些條件下游泳嗎?
跳水後如何離開水面?
我是否需要任何其他設備,例如手套或救生衣或頭盔?
尋問跳水區附近有人嗎?他們知道我在跳水嗎?
這些都不是複雜的問題,也不需要任何技術培訓。這只是基本常識。大多數人無需考慮即可自動執行此操作。
以上並不是特別危險。人們在人身安全方面通常是安全和負責的,有幾個重要例外。真正的安全提示在這裡:
1)跳懸崖時切勿飲酒。
您會驚訝於自然界發生了多少次與酒精有關的事故。
2)切勿向任何人施壓,讓他們嘗試自己不舒服的特技。
如果某人感到害怕,那是因為他們缺乏必要的技能或經驗。這會增加了風險。要教導/不要強迫或欺負霸凌
3)永遠知道你的極限在哪。
採取嬰兒的步驟。在不諮詢經驗豐富的人的情況下,請勿嘗試超出您的經驗水平的事情。忽略任何給您施加壓力或激你的人。他們不會是好朋友。
4)不要試圖做任何愚蠢的事情來打動一個女孩。
這不值得。在接受調查的10位女性中,有9位偏好沒有頭部受傷的男性。
現在去實驗在河邊玩得開心。嘗試去懸崖跳水。盡可能地爬高。在這過程,如果您在任何時候階段感到不舒服時,可以慢慢後退並從較低的地方跳下來,或者根本就不要跳。
和您信任的朋友一起去,並互相觀察注意對方。
首先檢查天氣。提前準備所需的裝備。您可能需要一個漂浮裝備(救生衣或浮標等)。如果您發現之後沒有足夠的裝備,則不需要嘗試去做未做好準備的事。選擇準備好的一天再去玩。
按照這些基本步驟進行操作,您很快就會意識到歇斯底里並不是實現水安全的正確方法。但知識教育和準備好卻是安全的方式。
*跳躍高度是根據h = 1 / 2gt ^ 2,t = 1.154s + -0.004s(240fps)從跳躍頂點確定的
What really happens VS what people see.
Yesterday I posted this which seemed to rile people up. Many people think posting like this is inciting dangerous behavior. "Bad Demonstration. Ignorant people will follow this and die". Why is it always other people who are behaving irresponsibly. No ever ever comments "I might try to repeat this and die" Why is there so much distrust of other people? What makes your judgement so much better than everyone else's?
People aren't at risk from watching a video and then trying to repeat it. If you believed people like that existed then the "fast and the furious "movies would make you too scared to leave the house for fear of reckless drivers.
The video was filmed at a high frame rate (slow motion). Long airtime gives it the appearance of being a very high jump, but it's only 6.5 meters. While not particularly high, this is still high enough to be painful if you landed on your back or stomach. I know, because I'm not good at doing backflips, but I still try anyway. Landing on your stomach isn’t fatal, but it’s not fun either. That's why I recommend jumping feet first, hands in, as seen in the video. It's actually quite a good demonstration.
I always tell people to check water depth and ensure there are no obstructions before jumping. But when we say "look before you jump" what we really mean is "Think before you act".
Is it risky to climb up to the platform?
Is the platform I am jumping from stable?
Where is my planned landing zone?
Are there any people or objects in the landing zone?
Is the depth of the water suitable for jumping from this height?
What will I do in the air while jumping?
What is my planned body orientation for landing?
Can I swim in these conditions?
How will I exit the water after jumping?
Do I need any additional equipment such as gloves or a life jacket?
Are there people nearby? Do they know I am jumping?
None of these are complicated questions and none require any technical training. This is just basic common sense. Most people do this automatically, without even having to think about it.
The above isn't especially dangerous. People are generally safe and responsible when it comes to their personal safety with a few important exceptions. The real safety tips are down here:
1) Never consume alcohol while cliff jumping. You'd be surprised how many accidents in nature involve alcohol.
2) Never pressure anyone into attempting a stunt they are not comfortable with. If someone is scared, it's because they lack the requisite skill or experience. This increases risk. Teach. Don't tease .
3) Know your limits. Take baby steps. Don't attempt something far above your experience level without consulting someone with more experience. Ignore anyone who is pressuring you. They're not being good friends.
4) Don't do anything stupid to impress a girl. It's not worth it. 9 out of 10 women surveyed preferred men without head injuries.
Now go out to the river and have some fun. Go cliff jumping. Climb as high as you feel comfortable. And if at any time if you feel uncomfortable, just back down and jump from somewhere lower, or not at all. Go with friends that you trust, and watch out for each other. Check the weather first. Prepare equipment you need in advance. You may need a flotation device. If you realize you don’t have enough equipment later, you don’t need to attempt anything you are not prepared for. Just come back and play another day.
Follow these basic steps and you will soon realize that hysteria isn’t the proper approach to water safety. Knowledge and preparation is.
*jump height determined using h= 1/2gt^2, t=1.154s+-0.004s (240fps), from apex of jump
be responsible for意思 在 英文單字筆記粉絲團- 負責任是一種態度,中文說的"負責 ... 的美食出口停車場
負責任是一種態度,中文說的"負責"這個動作用英文來表示通常用「be responsible for + 受詞」或「be in charge of + 受詞」這兩種方式來表示,例如I am responsible ... ... <看更多>