#美國總統大選做票_抓到了!
美國總統大選果然有舞弊!美國賓州一名男子,假借其亡母的名義投票,被判刑五年!
等等!瞎密!他是投給川普??(叭叭叭)
---
A Pennsylvania man has been sentenced to five years of probation after pleading guilty to casting a vote in the name of his deceased mother in an effort to reelect then-President Donald Trump, according to court records and Delaware County District Attorney Jack Stollsteimer's office.
Bruce Bartman, 70, received the sentence Friday after entering a guilty plea to two counts of perjury and one count of unlawful voting. Bartman will also lose his right to vote for four years, pursuant to Pennsylvania statute, the district attorney's office said in a news release.
https://edition.cnn.com/2021/05/03/politics/pennsylvania-probation-illegal-ballot-trump-2020/index.html?utm_term=link&utm_source=fbCNN&utm_content=2021-05-04T03%3A28%3A05&utm_medium=social&fbclid=IwAR3-Eqc2d0kxpy4ONOKfFf5LRpBd2osUQPkRd-S5LzyzXHjPQdKHolWndug
同時也有1部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過75萬的網紅志祺七七 X 圖文不符,也在其Youtube影片中提到,這支影片是黃標嗎?#對這支影片是黃標 如果你覺得它不應該被黃標 歡迎留言 #ItDeservesGreenMark #這應該綠標 和我們一起協助 YouTube 建立一個更完善、更精準的AI判別系統! ✔︎ 成為七七會員(幫助我們繼續日更,並享有會員專屬福利):https://bit.ly/3e...
unlawful illegal 在 小小人物做小事 - 高松傑Jacky Facebook 的精選貼文
我在《橙新聞》最新的英文評論文章😎😎😎
https://apps.orangenews.hk/app/common/details_html…
Opinion | US Secretary of State is violating the Law of Safeguarding National Security in Hong Kong
HK Current
20th of October 2020
By Athena Kung
On 14th of October 2020 [US time], a report was released by the United States (hereinafter refer to as "the US") Secretary of State (hereinafter referred to as "the said Report") under the so-called "Hong Kong Autonomy Act". During recent months, the US Government has been increasingly blatant in its interference in Hong Kong's affairs. Its petty actions included passing successive laws, pronouncing an executive order and imposing 'sanctions' against HKSAR Government's officials under the pretext of so-called "human rights", "democracy" and "autonomy".
In short, the accusations against the HKSAR Government contained in the said Report are all groundless, unwarranted and irresponsible. All the comments in the said Report are really smearing and demonising The Law of the People's Republic of China on Safeguarding National Security in the HKSAR (hereinafter referred to as "National Security Law"). Being the highest organ of state power, the National People's Congress (hereinafter referred to as "the NPC") has lawfully authorized the Standing Committee of the NPC (hereinafter referred to as "the SCNPC") to formulate relevant laws on establishing the legal system and enforcement mechanisms for the HKSAR to safeguard the national security. Thus, the enactment of the National Security Law on 30th of June 2020 by the SCNPC is both lawful and constitutional.
Before the implementation of the National Security Law, due to the fear towards the violence exercised by the rioters who supported HK independence, majority of the HK citizens did not dare to voice out their opinions whenever their views was against that of the rioters. Only the riots were able to enjoy the freedom of speech during the whole period of Black Power Anti-government Movement. However, since the National Security Law has come into effect, stability can be restored in the HKSAR step by step, whereas once again, HK citizens are able to enjoy their basic rights and freedoms in accordance with the law as before. All along, the US Government has embellished the violence and illegal acts exercised by the rioters who are wrongfully beautified as democracy warrior. The ulterior motives behind was US Government's great desire to build up a pro-American Government in HK by promoting Colour Revolution here. With the success of promoting HK Independence, the US may make use of HK as a Bridgehead to attack PRC whose Great Rejuvenation might then be hindered.
Recently, US has also imposed certain "sanctions" on financial institutions and HKSAR Government officials, which is another concrete evidence proving the hegemony on the part of US. The US Government has been exerting pressure on financial institutions and HKSAR Government officials so as to threaten the officials not to pass any law or policies which the US Government dislike. By so doing, the US Secretary of State is clearly violating 2 areas of the National Security Law, including:
(1) Secession under Article 20(1), namely participating in separating the HKSAR from the PRC by with a view to committing secession or undermining national unification whether or not by force or threat of force ; and
(2) Subversion under Article 22(3), namely participating in seriously interfering in, disrupting, or undermining the performance of duties and functions in accordance with the law by the body of power of the HKSAR by force or threat of force or other unlawful means with a view to subverting the State.
Is the National Security Law applicable to the US Secretary of State? The answer is positive. Under Article 38, the National Security Law shall apply to offences under this Law committed against the HKSAR from outside the Region by a person who is not a permanent resident of the Region.
In addition, according to Article 55 of the National Security Law, it is appropriate for the national security case of the US Secretary of State to be taken up by the Office for Safeguarding National Security of the Central People's Government in the HKSAR (hereinafter referred to as "the Office"):
"Article 55
The Office for Safeguarding National Security of the Central People's Government in the HKSAR shall, upon approval by the Central People's Government of a request made by the Government of the HKSAR or by the Office itself, exercise jurisdiction over a case concerning offence endangering national security under this law, if:
(1) the case is complex due to the involvement of a foreign country or external elements, thus making it difficult for the Region to exercise jurisdiction over the case ;
(2) a serious situation occurs where the Government of the Region is unable to effectively enforce this law ; or
(3) a major and imminent threat to national security has occurred."
No doubt, with the involvement of the US Secretary of State who enjoys a high weight in the US Government in a national security case, the whole case would definitely become very complex as a result of existence of such an external element. After all, it would be extremely difficult for the HKSAR Government to exercise jurisdiction over the case, for instance, in the areas of collecting evidence and making necessary investigations. Under such circumstances, it is necessary for the Office to take up this case and exercise jurisdiction over it.
The author is Barrister-at-law.
The views don't necessarily reflect those of Orange News.
責編:CK Li
編輯:Jchow
unlawful illegal 在 おしゃれキリ教室 Facebook 的最佳解答
問:是否可視之為中大校方與學生割蓆?
—我是分隔線—
【香港中文大學聲明】
對於中大校園昨日 (11月12日)發生的連串衝突、暴力及違法行為,大學深表遺憾,並予以強烈譴責。儘管校長及高層人員屢次嘗試作出調停及談判,最終都因雙方持續對峙而不果。在對峙及衝突過程中,在場人士持續投擲汽油彈及攻擊物品等,警方亦多次發射催淚彈及橡膠彈等,導致校內多名員生受傷,大學深表遺憾及歉意。
香港中文大學有責任保障校園內所有員生的安全,絕不容許任何形式的暴力或危害他人安全的行為。任何人士如意圖利用大學校園作出任何違法或暴力行為,大學必須按照大學既定守則及法例,維護校園及所有員生安全。大學懇切呼籲所有員生及社會各界人士,給予大學時間及空間讓大學盡快恢復秩序及安寧,讓大學可以繼續履行教與學的任務,以知識貢獻社會。
昨晚段崇智校長親身到警署了解被捕中大學生的情況,三位學生已獲保釋並獲安排醫療及法律協助。大學會繼續為其他受傷員生提供協助。
Statement by The Chinese University of Hong Kong
The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK) expresses deep regret and strong condemnation over the sequence of conflicts and violent, unlawful activities which took place on the CUHK campus yesterday (12 November). Despite multiple attempts to coordinate and negotiate with both parties made by the Vice-Chancellor and senior management, the negotiation ultimately failed due to sustained confrontation. Petrol bombs and injurious objects were continuously thrown by the crowd present during the confrontation, while the police fired volleys of tear gas and rubber bullets. The University is saddened to learn that a number of colleagues and students were injured in these incidents.
CUHK has the responsibility to ensure the safety of all staff and students on campus. All forms of violence or acts that pose a danger to others are prohibited. If anyone should use the campus for any illegal or violent activities, the University is duty bound to invoke its established rules and regulations to safeguard the security of the campus and the safety of all CUHK members. The University sincerely appeals to all members of the University and different sectors of the community to give us time and space for a prompt restoration of order and function on campus, so that the University can carry on with our primary mission of teaching and learning to service the community by means of knowledge creation and dissemination.
Upon learning of the arrest of CUHK students yesterday, Professor Rocky S. Tuan, Vice-Chancellor and President of CUHK, went to the police station to visit the arrested students. Three students were subsequently released on bail and provided medical and legal assistance. The University will continue to provide appropriate assistance to other injured members of the University.
unlawful illegal 在 志祺七七 X 圖文不符 Youtube 的最佳解答
這支影片是黃標嗎?#對這支影片是黃標
如果你覺得它不應該被黃標
歡迎留言 #ItDeservesGreenMark #這應該綠標
和我們一起協助 YouTube 建立一個更完善、更精準的AI判別系統!
✔︎ 成為七七會員(幫助我們繼續日更,並享有會員專屬福利):https://bit.ly/3eYdLKp
✔︎ 訂閱志祺七七頻道: http://bit.ly/shasha77_subscribe
✔︎ 追蹤志祺IG :https://www.instagram.com/shasha77.daily
✔︎ 來看志祺七七粉專 :http://bit.ly/shasha77_fb
✔︎ 如果不便加入會員,也可從這裡贊助我們:https://bit.ly/support-shasha77
(請記得在贊助頁面留下您的email,以便我們寄送發票。若遇到金流問題,麻煩請聯繫:service@simpleinfo.cc)
#Pornhub #Visa #Mastercard
各節重點:
00:00 前導
01:00 紐約時報的報導
02:23 Pornhub的問題在哪?
03:54 紐時建議的解決方案是?
05:17 Visa與Mastercard的行動
06:25 Pornhub的新措施
08:08 推出措施後的輿論反應是?
09:38 我們的觀點
11:23 提問
【 製作團隊 】
|企劃:冰鱸
|腳本:冰鱸
|編輯:土龍
|剪輯後製:Pookie
|剪輯助理:歆雅
|演出:志祺
——
【 本集參考資料 】
→The Children of Pornhub:https://nyti.ms/2WelAV9
→Pornhub - Our Commitment to Trust and Safety:https://bit.ly/3mgGE85
→Visa 推特貼文:https://bit.ly/3nmMJB1
→Pornhub limits uploads and disables downloads after New York Times exposé:https://bit.ly/2IOvMAr
→Visa and Mastercard to Investigate Financial Ties to Pornhub:https://nyti.ms/3mf98yU
→Pornhub Upended the Porn Industry. Now New Changes Could Destroy Sex Workers’ Livelihoods:https://bit.ly/3qUGzdE
→Visa and Mastercard Will Stop Processing Payments to Pornhub:https://bit.ly/3qWQHm8
→PayPal abruptly cuts off Pornhub’s payroll, leaving performers with few payment options:https://bit.ly/34fcw6D
→Visa and Mastercard cut off Pornhub after report of unlawful videos:https://bit.ly/2K4IPhS
→Mastercard, Visa halt payments on Pornhub over allegations of child sex-abuse content:https://reut.rs/3oSSNl5
→Visa and Mastercard to Investigate Financial Ties to Pornhub:https://nyti.ms/34c0CdG
→Mastercard, Visa Cut Off Pornhub Following Charges Of Illegal Content:https://bit.ly/3oT0qrY
→Pornhub - The 2019 Year in Review:https://bit.ly/3gMC2Fm
→成人網站Pornhub影片涉兒童性侵? 萬事達、VISA要查:https://bit.ly/37gCYii
→Pornhub遭控上架兒童性侵影片 網站大動作整頓:https://bit.ly/3aelrcq
→Pornhub 關停大部分下載功能,且不再允許未驗證用戶上傳影片:https://engt.co/2WdsJF4
→「被 Pornhub 毀掉的孩子」:問題不在色情,而在藉強暴孩童營利:https://bit.ly/37m9Hmu
\每週7天,每天7點,每次7分鐘,和我們一起了解更多有趣的生活議題吧!/
🥁七七仔們如果想寄東西關懷七七團隊與志祺,傳送門如下:
106台北市大安區羅斯福路二段111號8樓
🟢如有業務需求,請洽:hi77@simpleinfo.cc
🔴如果影片內容有誤,歡迎來信勘誤:hey77@simpleinfo.cc
![post-title](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/4fq4wkCG03M/hqdefault.jpg)
unlawful illegal 在 "illegal" 和"unlawful" 的差別在哪裡? 的相關結果
illegal 的同義字illegal is : forbidden by the law. unlawful is: not authorized. example: selling alcohol to minors is illegal ( expressly ... ... <看更多>
unlawful illegal 在 Difference between Illegal and Unlawful 的相關結果
The difference between 'illegal' and 'unlawful' is not large, and many times ... ... <看更多>
unlawful illegal 在 What's the difference between Unlawful and Illegal? - STAR ... 的相關結果
Definition of Illegal: An act is illegal if it breaks a current law or statute that has been passed by the government. · Definition of Unlawful: Unlawful on the ... ... <看更多>