🔥🔥 10 Points in Response to the Prime Minister's "Recovery Plan". Window Dressing Is Not Going To Cut It This Time | Industries Unite
(1) The fact that we have a one-pager after enduring the pandemic for 15months, speaks volumes of the perceived indecisiveness, inefficiency and lack of a cohesive idea on the part of the Government on how and when we are going to come out of this. Contain the pandemic and have a structured economic recovery.. There are too many if's and variables in play for the plan to actually spur the confidence of the #Rakyat.
(2) Weren't we at these levels last year? Unless we have a clear and defined path forward the idea that we will come out of this in September or October 2021, is not convincing; amongst others as the whole plan is entirely based on the accuracy of purported numbers of infected persons and the availability of vaccinations on time. Many analysts have openly stated serious doubts on this.
(3) There are serious doubts about the absolute numbers that the government is resting the substratum of the 'Recovery Plan' on. Limited and variable testing numbers and testings may mean that there are flaws in the absolute numbers being relied upon here. This appears to be supported by the Code-Blue stats.
(4) Where is the tracking data on clusters and contact tracing?
Without this, we are fighting with eyes closed. In any case, most of the cases appear to be asymptomatic, so are the numbers correct?
(5) What if this doesn't work? We simply cannot afford to get it wrong now, the fear is that the projection put forward by you, is not based on any data that has been made available to be scrutinised and verified. Just a blanket wish-list. With the current numbers of new cases and the projection of average positivity rate. With the data, We will be able to see the real numbers (projected forecast) and tabulate a much more concrete plan. However, is the government not doing this because as the numbers are bad? These are serious questions that we have.
(6) Increasing the capacity to vaccinate should be the priority moving forward. Delay and bureaucracy are issues ignored here. Private practitioners who have been inoculating children and adults for decades are not being fully mobilised , these private practitioners, who are by law allowed to vaccinate the public are frustrated by the process of having to register and by trained by a private company #ProtectHealth. The Government's refusal to fully utilise the existing infrastructure of the many #Klinik #Kesihatan and government hospital out-patient facilities, preferring them to mega #PPVs is not optimising the capacity to vaccinate. They have not taken into account that many people especially in the rural areas do not have smart phones or connectivity, yet we insist on deployment of a RM70 million application that has shown itself to crash twice! A manual system was used to great effect in the USA and UK to great effect in simplifying the process and increasing capacity.
(7) The idea of employers being allowed to pay to vaccinate raises the question of allocation of vaccines and a two class system of vaccination process.
(8 ) There is no indication of how and when the vaccination are going to be distributed to the states. Why are we not involving the individual state health apparatus. Surely, they are already set up and are better positioned to roll it out .
(9) Where are the dollars and cents in numbers, in-terms of assistance and Aid to the #public and #businesses to stabilise their economic position for the duration that there are restrictions on movement (#FMCO). Where is the Plan B, in case the targets as stated are not met? What is the plan? Can the government be sure?
(10) Surely a recovery plan should include a plan for Economic Recovery over at least 3 years. If there is One, Where is it?
(11) Do we have an adequate safety net for the public? There is no indication of when people will get back jobs and when, businesses will get back to normal. One cannot assume economically everything will be ok, once we reach October 2021.
It will take many months thereafter to get back to employability and profitability. So whats the plan for that? What are the projections? What are the solutions? What is the plan ?
WE SIMPLY CANNOT AFRORD TO GET THIS WRONG THIS TIME.
PEOPLE ARE DYING. BUSINESSES ARE FOLDING. WE NEED MORE.
Dato' David Gurupatham
Datuk Irwin SW Cheong
On-behalf of #IndustriesUnite.
#OneVoice #kitajagakita #ManaPelan #JabatanPerdanaMenteri #RecoveryPlan #MOFMalaysia #KementerianKewanganMalaysia #KKM #covid19 #PKP3 #MCO3 #RintihanRakyat
同時也有2部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過16萬的網紅chungdha,也在其Youtube影片中提到,There are plenty of gift videos online, but often are of gift photographers probably already own or reality are very pointless, but in this video I am...
「are there any persons」的推薦目錄:
- 關於are there any persons 在 拿督雷智雄博士 Dato' Tony Looi Chee Hong Facebook 的最讚貼文
- 關於are there any persons 在 Milton Goh Blog and Sermon Notes Facebook 的精選貼文
- 關於are there any persons 在 唐家婕 - Jane Tang Facebook 的最佳貼文
- 關於are there any persons 在 chungdha Youtube 的最佳解答
- 關於are there any persons 在 JianHao Tan Youtube 的最佳貼文
are there any persons 在 Milton Goh Blog and Sermon Notes Facebook 的精選貼文
Jesus The Word
How do we know that Jesus is “the Word”?
“The Word became flesh, and lived among us. We saw his glory, such glory as of the one and only Son of the Father, full of grace and truth.” (John 1:14 WEB)
Jesus is the only member of God who became flesh, and He is the Son of the Father.
“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made through him. Without him was not anything made that has been made.” (John 1:1-3 WEB)
In the opening verses of John’s gospel, we learn very important truths about Christ (Jesus) who is “the Word”.
Christ existed since the beginning (in eternity before time began).
Christ and God (the Father and the Holy Spirit) are three distinct persons.
Christ is God. All three persons (Father, Word, and Spirit) are God.
Christ is the co-creator of all things. All things were made through Him—God spoke (the Word) and creation came into being.
There are some people who say that Jesus is not God, and that He is only God’s Son. The following verse should clarify any confusion:
“For there are certain men who crept in secretly, even those who were long ago written about for this condemnation: ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into indecency, and denying our only Master, God, and Lord, Jesus Christ.” (Jude 1:4 WEB)
The apostle Jude clearly wrote that Jesus Christ is God. There is no uncertainty or guessing about this—Jesus the Word, is God!
Understand every parable, miracle, and teaching in the four gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John: https://bit.ly/understandeveryparable
are there any persons 在 唐家婕 - Jane Tang Facebook 的最佳貼文
Breaking‼️
美東時間1月5日傍晚,川普以國家安全為由,用行政命令方式禁止阿里支付寶、微信支付、QQ錢包在內的8款中國應用程式(App)。
行政命令發佈後45天,禁止任何人與實體與這8款中國應用程式(App)進行交易。
按照日程,美國下任政府將在15天後,1月20日上任。
—
美國商務部長在同一時間發聲明表示,已指示商務部按行政命令執行禁令,「支持川普總統保護美國人民隱私與安全,免於受到中國共產黨的威脅。」
—
▫️8款App:
支付寶(Alipay)、掃描全能王(CamScanner)、QQ錢包(QQ Wallet)、茄子快傳(SHAREit)、騰訊QQ(Tencent QQ)、阿里巴巴旗下海外短視頻應用VMate、微信支付(WeChat Pay)和辦公型App WPS Office。
圖三:美國商務部聲明
圖四:美國國安顧問聲明
—
▫️白宮行政命令全文:
The White House
Office of the Press Secretary
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
January 5, 2021
EXECUTIVE ORDER
- - - - - - -
ADDRESSING THE THREAT POSED BY APPLICATIONS AND OTHER SOFTWARE DEVELOPED OR CONTROLLED BY CHINESE COMPANIES
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code,
I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, find that additional steps must be taken to deal with the national emergency with respect to the information and communications technology and services supply chain declared in Executive Order 13873 of May 15, 2019 (Securing the Information and Communications Technology and Services Supply Chain). Specifically, the pace and pervasiveness of the spread in the United States of certain connected mobile and desktop applications and other software developed or controlled by persons in the People's Republic of China, to include Hong Kong and Macau (China), continue to threaten the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States. At this time, action must be taken to address the threat posed by these Chinese connected software applications.
By accessing personal electronic devices such as smartphones, tablets, and computers, Chinese connected software applications can access and capture vast swaths of information from users, including sensitive personally identifiable information and private information. This data collection threatens to provide the Government of the People's Republic of China (PRC) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) with access to Americans' personal and proprietary information -- which would permit China to track the locations of Federal employees and contractors, and build dossiers of personal information.
The continuing activity of the PRC and the CCP to steal or otherwise obtain United States persons' data makes clear that there is an intent to use bulk data collection to advance China's economic and national security agenda. For example, the 2014 cyber intrusions of the Office of Personnel Management of security clearance records of more than 21 million people were orchestrated by Chinese agents. In 2015, a Chinese hacking group breached the United States health insurance company Anthem, affecting more than 78 million Americans. And the Department of Justice indicted members of the Chinese military for the 2017 Equifax cyber intrusion that compromised the personal information of almost half of all Americans.
In light of these risks, many executive departments and agencies (agencies) have prohibited the use of Chinese connected software applications and other dangerous software on Federal Government computers and mobile phones. These prohibitions, however, are not enough given the nature of the threat from Chinese connected software applications. In fact, the Government of India has banned the use of more than 200 Chinese connected software applications throughout the country; in a statement, India's Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology asserted that the applications were "stealing and surreptitiously transmitting users' data in an unauthorized manner to servers which have locations outside India."
The United States has assessed that a number of Chinese connected software applications automatically capture vast swaths of information from millions of users in the United States, including sensitive personally identifiable information and private information, which would allow the PRC and CCP access to Americans' personal and proprietary information.
The United States must take aggressive action against those who develop or control Chinese connected software applications to protect our national security.
Accordingly, I hereby order:
Section 1. (a) The following actions shall be prohibited beginning 45 days after the date of this order, to the extent permitted under applicable law: any transaction by any person, or with respect to any property, subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, with persons that develop or control the following Chinese connected software applications, or with their subsidiaries, as those transactions and persons are identified by the Secretary of Commerce (Secretary) under subsection (e) of this section: Alipay, CamScanner, QQ Wallet, SHAREit, Tencent QQ, VMate, WeChat Pay, and WPS Office.
(b) The Secretary is directed to continue to evaluate Chinese connected software applications that may pose an unacceptable risk to the national security, foreign policy, or economy of the United States, and to take appropriate action in accordance with Executive Order 13873.
(c) Not later than 45 days after the date of this order, the Secretary, in consultation with the Attorney General and the Director of National Intelligence, shall provide a report to the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs with recommendations to prevent the sale or transfer of United States user data to, or access of such data by, foreign adversaries, including through the establishment of regulations and policies to identify, control, and license the export of such data.
(d) The prohibitions in subsection (a) of this section apply except to the extent provided by statutes, or in regulations, orders, directives, or licenses that may be issued pursuant to this order, and notwithstanding any contract entered into or any license or permit granted before the date of this order.
(e) Not earlier than 45 days after the date of this order, the Secretary shall identify the transactions and persons that develop or control the Chinese connected software applications subject to subsection (a) of this section.
Sec. 2. (a) Any transaction by a United States person or within the United States that evades or avoids, has the purpose of evading or avoiding, causes a violation of, or attempts to violate the prohibition set forth in this order is prohibited.
(b) Any conspiracy formed to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.
Sec. 3. For the purposes of this order:
(a) the term "connected software application" means software, a software program, or group of software programs, designed to be used by an end user on an end-point computing device and designed to collect, process, or transmit data via the Internet as an integral part of its functionality.
(b) the term "entity" means a government or instrumentality of such government, partnership, association, trust, joint venture, corporation, group, subgroup, or other organization, including an international organization;
(c) the term "person" means an individual or entity;
(d) the term "personally identifiable information" (PII) is information that, when used alone or with other relevant data, can identify an individual. PII may contain direct identifiers (e.g., passport information) that can identify a person uniquely, or quasi-identifiers (e.g., race) that can be combined with other quasi-identifiers (e.g., date of birth) to successfully recognize an individual.
(e) the term "United States person" means any United States citizen, permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches), or any person in the United States.
Sec. 4. (a) The Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury and the Attorney General, is hereby authorized to take such actions, including adopting rules and regulations, and to employ all powers granted to me by IEEPA, as may be necessary to implement this order. All agencies shall take all appropriate measures within their authority to implement this order.
(b) The heads of agencies shall provide, in their discretion and to the extent permitted by law, such resources, information, and assistance to the Department of Commerce as required to implement this order, including the assignment of staff to the Department of Commerce to perform the duties described in this order.
Sec. 5. Severability. If any provision of this order, or the application of any provision to any person or circumstance, is held to be invalid, the remainder of this order and the application of its other provisions to any other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby.
Sec. 6. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:
(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department, agency, or the head thereof; or
(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.
(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
DONALD J. TRUMP
THE WHITE HOUSE,
January 5, 2021.
are there any persons 在 chungdha Youtube 的最佳解答
There are plenty of gift videos online, but often are of gift photographers probably already own or reality are very pointless, but in this video I am showing you something all Photographers / Videographers / Vlogger and Youtubers would need plenty of and even if multiple persons are giving the same item, it still be a welcomed gift.
Sandisk SSD - https://amzn.to/2V73jIS
Samsung T5 SSD - https://amzn.to/2V5CvJ2
WD HDD - https://amzn.to/39ifpHp
WD Mycloud HDD - https://amzn.to/2JaKCS5
This video was filmed with
Panasonic GH5 - https://amzn.to/3fEvXuo
Laowa 7.5mm f2 - https://amzn.to/3fDn6sT
Rode Lavalier - https://amzn.to/39jXS1A
Manfrotto Tripod - https://amzn.to/37eencu
Nanlite Forza60 - https://amzn.to/3fEwSuQ
YC Onion Pudding - https://amzn.to/3fEwKLS
Check out my Adobe Premiere Pro Effects tutorials here:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLAdjMWVKvc3B2SqrDQB-r5EMxyrn29h6z
Edited with Adobe Premiere Pro - http://goo.gl/k2EagF
If you appreciate what I do, you can support me by donating any amount here on paypal:
http://paypal.me/ChungDha
? Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/chungdha
? Website: http://www.chungdha.nl
? Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/chungdha/
? Twitter: https://twitter.com/chungdha
For any Questions Please Join our Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/chungdhagroup
Business Inquiries, Sponsors & Collaboration email contact@chungdha.com
Chung Dha © 2020 Tsuen Wan, Hong Kong
are there any persons 在 JianHao Tan Youtube 的最佳貼文
Part 2: https://youtu.be/ZOLkjn411qE
An unknown virus has broken out among the citizens. However, there may be an even bigger impending threat upon the world...
Follow me on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@thejianhaotan?lang=en
Follow me on Instagram: http://www.instagram.com/thejianhaotan
Featuring:
Juhi: https://www.instagram.com/juhinars/
Ridhwan: https://www.instagram.com/ridhwannabe/
Vincent: https://www.instagram.com/itsvincentsin/
Nicole: https://www.instagram.com/nicolekittykatx/
Trevmonki: https://www.instagram.com/trevtham/
Jasmine: https://www.instagram.com/jasminelhr/
Danial Ron: https://www.instagram.com/Danialron/
Vicky: https://www.instagram.com/yklvv/
Hakim: https://www.instagram.com/runawaykim/
Kevin: https://www.instagram.com/kaleidoscovin/
Abbey: https://www.instagram.com/abbeypuppey/
Tasha: https://www.instagram.com/tashh6/
Leonard: https://www.instagram.com/leonardlyy/
Darrel: https://www.instagram.com/darrelkicksass/
Melvinder: https://www.instagram.com/melvinthesingh/
Michelle: https://www.instagram.com/debbear/
Kaela: https://www.instagram.com/ribbonsandlaces/
Vanessa: https://www.instagram.com/_vanessatiara_/
June: https://www.instagram.com/thejunemonth/
Ridhwan: https://www.instagram.com/ridhwannabe/
Fatyn: https://www.instagram.com/ftnfrzn/
Darrel: https://www.instagram.com/darrelkicksass/
Amirul: https://www.instagram.com/a.mrld/
Rainer: https://www.instagram.com/rxiner/
Tong en: https://www.instagram.com/tongennnn/
Melissa: https://www.instagram.com/tacomels/
Grace: https://www.instagram.com/graceglazee/
Crystal: https://www.instagram.com/crysta.bel/
Shannon: https://www.instagram.com/shannontaylortw/
Clarie: https://www.instagram.com/xclarieacaciateo/
Liz: https://www.instagram.com/kylolizy/
Get your merch now: http://www.teamtitanstore.com
This is a work of fiction. All character and other entities appearing in this work are fictitious. Any resemblance to real persons or other real-life entities, past or present, is purely coincidental.
Titan Digital Media:
http://www.titandigitalmedia.com
are there any persons 在 When to Use People vs. Persons | Merriam-Webster 的相關結果
There are few things in the English language more vexatious and bedeviling ... That universal chearfulness which is the lot of some people, persons that you ... ... <看更多>
are there any persons 在 Persons, People, or Peoples—When To Use Each | Grammarly 的相關結果
There was a time in history when it was put forward that grammatically, persons should be the preferred plural any time more than one person was referred to ... ... <看更多>
are there any persons 在 Person, persons or people ? - 當代英語文法- 劍橋線上詞典 的相關結果
Any person or persons found in possession of illegal substances will be prosecuted. To refer to groups of human beings or humans in general, ... ... <看更多>