關於 12 miles to minutes ，我們在網路上蒐集到這些相關的討論、資訊與評價

［時事英文］書呆子免疫力：天才ＩＴ大臣——唐鳳
　
“Nerd immunity” for the win!
　
nerd：一般指偏愛鑽研書本知識，將大量閒暇用於腦力工作，對流行文化不感興趣，而不願或不善於體育活動或其他社會活動的人。
　
for the win：（為了）勝利；超棒、超酷的
　
需要錄音檔的同學請於下方回覆「I want to practice listening! 」。

也來拿我們的【新聞英文-Marketing & Influencers 補充包】 https://bit.ly/2YJPZvb
　
★★★★★★★★★★★★
　
《Telegraph》報導：
　
Taiwan builds “nerd immunity” to resist Chinese disinformation campaigns. In a Telegraph interview, digital minister Audrey Tang explains Taiwan's innovative strategies to tackle false online claims. Audrey Tang, Taiwan's digital minister, is an expert on countering disinformation. In the battle to counter the modern-day scourge of weaponised online disinformation, Taiwan has locked on to a winning strategy – “nerd immunity”.
　
1. nerd immunity 書呆子免疫力*
2. herd immunity 群體免疫
3. a disinformation campaign 假資訊戰役
4. digital minister 數位部長
5. tackle (v.) 對付；處理；與……交涉
6. modern-day 現代的；當代的
7. scourge 災禍；天譴；苦難的根源
8. weaponise 使……武器化；將……變為武器
9. lock on 鎖定
　
臺灣建立了「書呆子免疫力」來對抗中國的假資訊戰役。在接受《電訊報》採訪時，數位部長唐鳳解釋了臺灣為解決不實的網路聲明所採取的創新戰略。臺灣數位部長唐鳳是對抗假資訊的專家。為了對抗當今被武器化的網路假資訊此一禍害，臺灣已鎖定了一項制勝戰略——「書呆子免疫力」。
　
★★★★★★★★★★★★
　
Sitting just 80 miles from China, Taiwan has been on the frontlines not only of the coronavirus pandemic but an “infodemic” of online disinformation. But the bombardment of Chinese state-sponsored influence has also made it a world leader in identifying and tackling disinformation. “When the majority of the population have this exposure and this inoculation, this builds nerd immunity,” Ms Tang, one of the world’s top open source software developers, told the Sunday Telegraph in an interview last week.
　
10. sit 坐落在；位於
11. frontline 最前線
12. not only…but… 不只……而且……
13. coronavirus pandemic 冠狀病毒大流行
14. infodemic 資訊疫情；資訊傳染病
15. bombardment 轟炸；砲擊
16. state-sponsored 國家贊助
17. influence 具影響力者（人或物）
18. exposure 接觸；面臨；遭受
19. inoculation 預防接種；思想灌輸
20. open source software 開源軟體；開放原始碼軟體
　
臺灣距離中國只有８０英里，不僅處在冠狀病毒大流行的前線，同時也身處網路假資訊「疫情」的最前線。但這些由中國政府所資助的資訊轟炸，也讓臺灣在辨別與處理假資訊上成為世界的領航者。上週，世上最頂尖的開源軟體開發者之一唐鳳女士在接受《週日電訊報》採訪時說道：「當多數人都曾與之接觸並預防接種時，就會建立起書呆子免疫力。」
　
★★★★★★★★★★★★
　
Although Taiwan has hundreds of full-time fact-checking experts, “what’s more important is the millions of people who volunteer maybe a couple minutes of their time to flag something they think as suspicious,” she said. “If you shut down the Internet, of course there’s no disinformation on social media, but what we’re trying to say is that Taiwan strengthened liberal democracy during the pandemic and during the infodemic. We would like to share that with liberal democracies.”
　
21. full-time 全日制的；全職的
22. fact-checking 事實查核
23. flag (v.) 標記
24. suspicious 可疑的
25. strengthen 增強；鞏固
26. liberal democracy 自由民主；自由主義式民主制
　
儘管臺灣有數百名專職的事實核查專家，但「更重要的是，數百萬人願意花費幾分鐘的時間來檢舉他們認為可疑的事情，」她如是說道。「如果你把網路關閉，那麼在社群媒體上當然不會有任何假資訊，但我們想說的是，臺灣在冠狀病毒肆虐之際以及資訊疫情期間，仍鞏固了自由民主制度。我們想與自由民主的國家分享這些經驗。」

＃國際時事英文
　
＃疫情英文

根據計算，100萬人遊行隊伍要從維多利亞公園排到廣東；200萬人遊行則要排到泰國。

順道一提香港15～30歲人口約莫100出頭萬人。以照片人群幾乎都是此年齡帶來看，兩個數字都是明顯誇大太多了。

另一個可以參考的是1969年的Woodstock Music & Art Fair，幾天內湧進40萬人次，照片看起來也是滿山滿谷的人。（http://sites.psu.edu/…/upl…/sites/851/2013/01/Woodstock3.jpg）

當年40萬人次引發驚人的大塞車，幾乎花十幾個小時才逐漸清場。

而香港遊行清場速度明顯快得多。

順道一提，因此運動而認定「你的父母不愛你」的白痴論述也如同文化大革命時的「爹親娘親不如毛主席親」般開始出現：

https://www.facebook.com/SaluteToHKPolice/videos/350606498983830/UzpfSTUyNzM2NjA3MzoxMDE1NjMyMTM4NjY3MTA3NA/

EVERY MAJOR NEWS outlet in the world is reporting that two million people, well over a quarter of our population, joined a single protest.
.
It’s an astonishing thought that filled an enthusiastic old marcher like me with pride. Unfortunately, it’s almost certainly not true.
.
A march of two million people would fill a street that was 58 kilometers long, starting at Victoria Park in Hong Kong and ending in Tanglangshan Country Park in Guangdong, according to one standard crowd estimation technique.
.
If the two million of us stood in a queue, we’d stretch 914 kilometers (568 miles), from Victoria Park to Thailand. Even if all of us marched in a regiment 25 people abreast, our troop would stretch towards the Chinese border.
.
Yes, there was a very large number of us there. But getting key facts wrong helps nobody. Indeed, it could hurt the protesters more than anyone.
.
For math geeks only, here’s a discussion of the actual numbers that I hope will interest you whatever your political views.
.
.
DO NUMBERS MATTER?
.
People have repeatedly asked me to find out “the real number” of people at the recent mass rallies in Hong Kong.
.
I declined for an obvious reason: There was a huge number of us. What does it matter whether it was hundreds of thousands or a million? That’s not important.
.
But my critics pointed out that the word “million” is right at the top of almost every report about the marches. Clearly it IS important.
.
.
FIRST, THE SCIENCE
.
In the west, drone photography is analyzed to estimate crowd sizes.
.
This reporter apologizes for not having found a comprehensive database of drone images of the Hong Kong protests.
.
But we can still use related methods, such as density checks, crowd-flow data and impact assessments. Universities which have gathered Hong Kong protest march data using scientific methods include Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, University of Hong Kong, and Hong Kong Baptist University.
.
.
DENSITY CHECKS
.
Figures gathered in the past by Hong Kong Polytechnic specialists using satellite photo analysis found a density level of one square meter per marcher. Modern analysis suggests this remains roughly accurate.
.
I know from experience that Hong Kong marches feature long periods of normal spacing (one square meter or one and half per person, walking) and shorter periods of tight spacing (half a square meter or less per person, mostly standing).
.
.
JOINERS AND SPEED
.
We need to include people who join halfway. In the past, a Hong Kong University analysis using visual counting methods cross-referenced with one-on-one interviews indicated that estimates should be boosted by 12% to accurately reflect late joiners. These days, we’re much more generous in estimating joiners.
.
As for speed, a Hong Kong Baptist University survey once found a passing rate of 4,000 marchers every ten minutes.
.
Videos of the recent rallies indicates that joiner numbers and stop-start progress were highly erratic and difficult to calculate with any degree of certainty.
.
.
DISTANCE MULTIPLIED BY DENSITY
.
But scientists have other tools. We know the walking distance between Victoria Park and Tamar Park is 2.9 kilometers. Although there was overspill, the bulk of the marchers went along Hennessy Road in Wan Chai, which is about 25 meters (or 82 feet) wide, and similar connected roads, some wider, some narrower.
.
Steve Doig, a specialist in crowd analysis approached by the Columbia Journalism Review (CJR), analyzed an image of Hong Kong marchers to find a density level of 7,000 people in a 210-meter space. Although he emphasizes that crowd estimates are never an exact science, that figure means one million Hong Kong marchers would need a street 18.6 miles long – which is 29 kilometers.
.
Extrapolating these figures for the June 16 claim of two million marchers, you’d need a street 58 kilometers long.
.
Could this problem be explained away by the turnover rate of Hong Kong marchers, which likely allowed the main (three kilometer) route to be filled more than once?
.
The answer is yes, to some extent. But the crowd would have to be moving very fast to refill the space a great many times over in a single afternoon and evening. It wasn’t. While I can walk the distance from Victoria Park to Tamar in 41 minutes on a quiet holiday afternoon, doing the same thing during a march takes many hours.
.
More believable: There was a huge number of us, but not a million, and certainly not two million.
.
.
IMPACT MEASUREMENTS
.
A second, parallel way of analyzing the size of the crowd is to seek evidence of the effects of the marchers’ absence from their normal roles in society.
.
If we extract two million people out of a population of 7.4 million, many basic services would be severely affected while many others would grind to a complete halt.
.
Manpower-intensive sectors of society, such as transport, would be badly affected by mass absenteeism. Industries which do their main business on the weekends, such as retail, restaurants, hotels, tourism, coffee shops and so on would be hard hit. Round-the-clock operations such as hospitals and emergency services would be severely troubled, as would under-the-radar jobs such as infrastructure and utility maintenance.
.
There seems to be no evidence that any of that happened in Hong Kong.
.
.
HOW DID WE GET INTO THIS MESS?
.
To understand that, a bit of historical context is necessary.
.
In 2003, a very large number of us walked from Victoria Park to Central. The next day, newspapers gave several estimates of crowd size.
.
The differences were small. Academics said it was 350,000 plus. The police counted 466,000. The organizers, a group called the Civil Rights Front, rounded it up to 500,000.
.
No controversy there. But there was trouble ahead.
.
.
THINGS FALL APART
.
At a repeat march the following year, it was obvious to all of us that our numbers were far lower that the previous year. The people counting agreed: the academics said 194,000 and the police said 200,000.
.
But the Civil Rights Front insisted that there were MORE than the previous year’s march: 530,000 people.
.
The organizers lost credibility even with us, their own supporters. To this day, we all quote the 2003 figure as the high point of that period, ignoring their 2004 invention.
.
.
THE TRUTH COUNTS
.
The organizers had embarrassed the marchers. The following year several organizations decided to serve us better, with detailed, scientific counts.
.
After the 2005 march, the academics said the headcount was between 60,000 and 80,000 and the police said 63,000. Separate accounts by other independent groups agreed that it was below 100,000.
.
But the organizers? The Civil Rights Front came out with the awkward claim that it was a quarter of a million. Ouch. (This data is easily confirmed from multiple sources in newspaper archives.)
.
.
AN UNEXPECTED TWIST
.
But then came a twist. Some in the Western media chose to present ONLY the organizer’s “outlier” claim.
.
“Dressed in black and chanting ‘one man, one vote’, a quarter of a million people marched through Hong Kong yesterday,” said the Times of London in 2005.
.
“A quarter of a million protesters marched through Hong Kong yesterday to demand full democracy from their rulers in Beijing,” reported the UK Independent.
.
It became obvious that international media outlets were committed to emphasizing whichever claim made the Hong Kong government (and by extension, China) look as bad as possible. Accuracy was nowhere in the equation.
.
.
STRATEGICALLY CHOSEN
.
At universities in Hong Kong, there were passionate discussions about the apparent decision to pump up the numbers as a strategy, with the international media in mind. Activists saw two likely positive outcomes.
.
First, anyone who actually wanted the truth would choose a middle point as the “real” number: thus it was worth making the organizers’ number as high as possible. (The police could be presented as corrupt puppets of Beijing.)
.
Second, international reporters always favored the largest number, since it implicitly criticized China. Once the inflated figure was established in the Western media, it would become the generally accepted figure in all publications.
.
Both of the activists’ predictions turned out to be bang on target. In the following years, headcounts by social scientists and police were close or even impressively confirmed the other—but were ignored by the agenda-driven international media, who usually printed only the organizers’ claims.
.
.
SKIP THIS SECTION
.
Skip this section unless you want additional examples to reinforce the point.
.
In 2011, researchers and police said that between 63,000 and 95,000 of us marched. Our delightfully imaginative organizers multiplied by four to claim there were 400,000 of us.
.
In 2012, researchers and police produced headcounts similar to the previous year: between 66,000 and 97,000. But the organizers claimed that it was 430,000. (These data can also be easily confirmed in any newspaper archive.)
.
.
SKIP THIS SECTION TOO
.
Unless you’re interested in the police angle. Why are police figures seen as lower than others? On reviewing data, two points emerge.
.
First, police estimates rise and fall with those of independent researchers, suggesting that they function correctly: they are not invented. Many are slightly lower, but some match closely and others are slightly higher. This suggests that the police simply have a different counting method.
.
Second, police sources explain that live estimates of attendance are used for “effective deployment” of staff. The number of police assigned to work on the scene is a direct reflection of the number of marchers counted. Thus officers have strong motivation to avoid deliberately under-estimating numbers.
.
.
RECENT MASS RALLIES
.
Now back to the present: this hot, uncomfortable summer.
.
Academics put the 2019 June 9 rally at 199,500, and police at 240,000. Some people said the numbers should be raised or even doubled to reflect late joiners or people walking on parallel roads. Taking the most generous view, this gave us total estimates of 400,000 to 480,000.
.
But the organizers, God bless them, claimed that 1.03 million marched: this was four times the researchers’ conservative view and more than double the generous view.
.
The addition of the “.03m” caused a bit of mirth among social scientists. Even an academic writing in the rabidly pro-activist Hong Kong Free Press struggled to accept it. “Undoubtedly, the anti-amendment group added the extra .03 onto the exact one million figure in order to give their estimate a veneer of accuracy,” wrote Paul Stapleton.
.
.
MIND-BOGGLING ESTIMATE
.
But the vast majority of international media and social media printed ONLY the organizers’ eyebrow-raising claim of a million plus—and their version soon fed back into the system and because the “accepted” number. (Some mentioned other estimates in early reports and then dropped them.)
.
The same process was repeated for the following Sunday, June 16, when the organizers’ frankly unbelievable claim of “about two million” was taken as gospel in the majority of international media.
.
“Two million people in Hong Kong protest China's growing influence,” reported Fox News.
.
“A record two million people – over a quarter of the city’s population” joined the protest, said the Guardian this morning.
.
“Hong Kong leader apologizes as TWO MILLION take to the streets,” said the Sun newspaper in the UK.
.
Friends, colleagues, fellow journalists—what happened to fact-checking? What happened to healthy skepticism? What happened to attempts at balance?
.
.
CONCLUSIONS?
.
I offer none. I prefer that you do your own research and draw your own conclusions. This is just a rough overview of the scientific and historical data by a single old-school citizen-journalist working in a university coffee shop.
.
I may well have made errors on individual data points, although the overall message, I hope, is clear.
.
Hong Kong people like to march.
.
We deserve better data.
.
We need better journalism. Easily debunked claims like “more than a quarter of the population hit the streets” help nobody.
.
International media, your hostile agendas are showing. Raise your game.
.
Organizers, stop working against the scientists and start working with them.
.
Hong Kong people value truth.
.
We’re not stupid. (And we’re not scared of math!)

這款大家應該都很熟，原為二戰運輸機C-47原，在1960年代越戰期間，改裝成空中砲艇「AC-47」，代號「幽靈」(Spooky)，綽號被稱「噴火神龍」(Puff, the Magic Dragon，出自1963年發表的美國流行歌曲〈魔法龍帕夫〉)

美軍在C-47的兩個窗開口上，以及所有左側的貨艙門上安裝3挺M134機槍(Minigun)，其主要功能是為地面部隊實行近距空中支援，可以提供綿密的火網支援，有效火力覆蓋約為一個平均直徑47.5公尺的微橢圓面，由於在越南戰場上得到實戰驗證，獲得駐越美軍的尊敬與仰賴，這也是美軍首個空中砲艇的始祖

#VietnamReviited
The Douglas AC-47 Spooky (also nicknamed "Puff, the Magic Dragon") was the first in a series of gunships developed by the United States Air Force during the Vietnam War. It was designed to provide more firepower than light and medium ground-attack aircraft in certain situations when ground forces called for close air support.
In August 1964, years of fixed-wing gunship experimentation reached a new peak with Project Tailchaser under the direction of Capt. John C. Simons. This test involved the conversion of a single Convair C-131B to be capable of firing a single GAU-2/A Minigun at a downward angle out of the left side of the aircraft. Even crude grease pencil crosshairs were quickly discovered to enable a pilot flying in a pylon turn to hit a stationary area target with relative accuracy and ease. The Armament Development and Test Center tested the craft at Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, but lack of funding soon suspended the tests. In 1964, Capt. Ron W. Terry returned from temporary duty in Vietnam as part of an Air Force Systems Command team reviewing all aspects of air operations in counter-insurgency warfare, where he had noted the usefulness of C-47s and C-123s orbiting as flare ships during night attacks on fortified hamlets. He received permission to conduct a live-fire test using the C-131 and revived the side-firing gunship program.

By October, Capt. Terry's team under Project Gunship provided a C-47D, which was converted to a similar standard as the Project Tailchaser aircraft and armed with three miniguns, which were initially mounted on locally fabricated mounts—essentially strapped gun pods intended for fixed-wing aircraft (SUU-11/A) onto a mount allowing them to be fired remotely out the port side. Captain Terry and a testing team arrived at Bien Hoa Air Base, South Vietnam, on 2 December 1964, with equipment needed to modify two C-47s. The first test aircraft (43-48579, a C-47B-5-DK mail courier converted to C-47D standard by removal of its superchargers) was ready by 11 December, the second by 15 December, and both were allocated to the 1st Air Commando Squadron for combat testing. The newly dubbed "FC-47" often operated under the radio call sign "Puff". Its primary mission involved protecting villages, hamlets, and personnel from mass attacks by VC guerrilla units.

Puff's first significant success occurred on the night of 23–24 December 1964. An FC-47 arrived over the Special Forces outpost at Tranh Yend in the Mekong Delta just 37 minutes after an air support request, fired 4,500 rounds of ammunition, and broke the Viet Cong attack. The FC-47 was then called to support a second outpost at Trung Hung, about 20 miles (32 km) away. The aircraft again blunted the VC attack and forced a retreat. Between 15 and 26 December, all the FC-47's 16 combat sorties were successful. On 8 February 1965, an FC-47 flying over the Bong Son area of Vietnam’s Central Highlands demonstrated its capabilities in the process of blunting a Viet Cong offensive. For over four hours, it fired 20,500 rounds into a Viet Cong hilltop position, killing an estimated 300 Viet Cong troops.

The early gunship trials were so successful, the second aircraft was returned to the United States early in 1965 to provide crew training. In July 1965, Headquarters USAF ordered TAC to establish an AC-47 squadron. By November 1965, a total of five aircraft were operating with the 4th Air Commando Squadron, activated in August as the first operational unit, and by the end of 1965, a total of 26 had been converted. Training Detachment 8, 1st Air Commando Wing, was subsequently established at Forbes AFB, Kansas. In Operation Big Shoot, the 4th ACS in Vietnam grew to 20 AC-47s (16 aircraft plus four reserves for attrition).

The 4th ACS deployed to Tan Son Nhut Air Base, Vietnam, on 14 November 1965. Now using the call sign "Spooky", each of its three 7.62 mm miniguns could selectively fire either 50 or 100 rounds per second. It can be seen in action here. Cruising in an overhead left-hand orbit at 120 knots air speed at an altitude of 3,000 feet (910 m), the gunship could put a bullet or glowing red tracer (every fifth round) bullet into every square yard of a football field-sized target in potentially less than 10 seconds. And, as long as its 45-flare and 24,000-round basic load of ammunition held out, it could do this intermittently while loitering over the target for hours.
In May 1966, the squadron moved north to Nha Trang Air Base to join the newly activated 14th Air Commando Wing. The 3rd Air Commando Squadron was activated at Nha Trang on 5 April 1968 as a second AC-47 squadron, with both squadrons redesignated as Special Operations Squadrons on 1 August 1968. Flights of both squadrons were stationed at bases throughout South Vietnam, and one flight of the 4th SOS served at Udorn Royal Thai Air Force Base with the 432nd Tactical Reconnaissance Wing. The superb work of the two AC-47 squadrons, each with 16 AC-47s flown by aircrews younger than the aircraft they flew, was undoubtedly a key contributor to the award of the Presidential Unit Citation to the 14th Air Commando Wing in June 1968.
One of the most publicized battles of the Vietnam War was the siege of Khe Sanh in early 1968, known as "Operation Niagara". More than 24,000 tactical and 2700 B-52 strikes dropped 110,000 tons of ordnance in attacks that averaged over 300 sorties per day. During the two and a half months of combat in that tiny area, fighters were in the air day and night. At night, AC-47 gunships kept up a constant chatter of fire against enemy troops. During darkness, AC-47 gunships provided illumination against enemy troops.

The AC-47D gunship should not be confused with a small number of C-47s which were fitted with electronic equipment in the 1950s. Prior to 1962, these aircraft were designated AC-47D. When a new designation system was adopted in 1962, these became EC-47Ds. The original gunships had been designated FC-47D by the United States Air Force, but with protests from fighter pilots, this designation was changed to AC-47D during 1965. Of the 53 aircraft converted to AC-47 configuration, 41 served in Vietnam and 19 were lost to all causes, 12 in combat. Combat reports indicate that no village or hamlet under Spooky Squadron protection was ever lost, and a plethora of reports from civilians and military personnel were made about AC-47s coming to the rescue and saving their lives.

As the United States began Project Gunship II and Project Gunship III, many of the remaining AC-47Ds were transferred to the Vietnam Air Force, the Royal Lao Air Force, and to Cambodia's Khmer Air Force, after Prince Norodom Sihanouk was deposed in a coup by General Lon Nol.

A1C John L. Levitow, an AC-47 loadmaster with the 3rd SOS, received the Medal of Honor for saving his aircraft, Spooky 71, from destruction on 24 February 1969 during a fire support mission at Long Binh. The aircraft was struck by an 82-mm mortar round that inflicted 3,500 shrapnel holes, wounding Levitow 40 times, but he used his body to jettison an armed magnesium flare, which ignited shortly after Levitow ejected it from the aircraft, allowing the AC-47 to return to base. #Phoenix

各位觀眾，酒意思Sip with Joyce 的最新餐酒搭配影片已經在YouTube上更新囉！

這集，我邀請到了一對與我非常要好的夫妻朋友，Vicky 及澍坤來為我們示範他們一家人都很喜歡的一個套餐，「漢堡排親子餐」。「漢堡排親子餐」可以在短短30 分鐘內完成。大人們在備餐的同時，還可以小酌一杯，這是多麽棒的一種生活模式啊！

漢堡排配葡萄酒看似簡單，但其中的配菜及搭配的醬汁才是影響選擇什麼樣的葡萄萄的關鍵所在。趕快把這集收藏起來，下次想吃漢堡排時，你就知道可以搭配什麼樣的葡萄酒囉！

非常感謝 Vicky 及澍坤以及他們一對可愛的兒女的大力的支持與配合。相隔 6,824 英里之遙以及 12 小時時差的我們，能一起完成這個單元實在太不容易，真的太感謝你們了！❤️❤️❤️

想要找更多、更精采有趣的餐酒搭配請至 酒意思 Sip with Joyce
網站： https://www.sipwithjoyce.com/
臉書：https://www.facebook.com/sipwithjoyce
IG: @joyce_foodnwine | https://www.instagram.com/joyce_foodnwine/
======

酒意思Sip with Joyce’s newest food and wine pairing video is up on YouTube!!! 🙌🙌🙌

In this video, I’m so excited to have my very good friends, Vicky and Shukun, and their beautiful kids, who live 6,800 miles away from NY, join me and show us how to make “Hamburg Steak Two Ways”. It’s a combo meal they enjoy very much and only takes 30 minutes to make.

What wine would go with “Hamburg Steak Two Ways”? Sounds like no brainer, but you know me. I always give fun pairing ideas. Don’t miss out.

Feeling so grateful that Vickey and Shukun are willing to be part of the project. Truly blessed to have a group of people support me and this project. Our team will try our best and continue to present our best work to you. ❤️❤️❤️

Looking for more food and wine pairing ideas, please visit 酒意思(Joyisi) Sip with Joyce
Website: https://www.sipwithjoyce.com/ Facebook：https://www.facebook.com/sipwithjoyce
Instagram: @joyce_foodnwine | https://www.instagram.com/joyce_foodnwine/

Boarding date: Wednesday, December 4, 2019
Airline: Singapore Airlines
Flight number: SQ377
Departs from: Milan-MXP
To: Singapore-SIN
Departure time: 12:45
Arrival time: 07:35
Duration: 11 hours 55 minutes
Equipment: A350-900
Aircraft number: 9V-SMY
Registration date: August 2019
Seating: Business Class (22A)
Ticketing: Alaska Airlines Award Tickets

Currently, tickets cannot be issued on this route.

This section is for tickets issued by Alaska Airlines.
Tickets were issued for 25,000 miles in Singapore Airlines Business Class on Singapore → Milan → Barcelona → Milan → Singapore → Shanghai.

This is the last section of the equipment. On the outbound route, it was the front seat, but on the return route, the last seat was specified. The differences are introduced here.

This series will last for a while, so please enjoy it.

Real-time information

Twitter
https://twitter.com/voreas_yamamoto

Instagram
http://www.instagram.com/voreas_yamamoto

#Singapore Airlines
#Award tickets
# A350
#business class
#Alaska Airlines

搭乗日：2019年9月4日(水)
航空会社：日本航空
便名：JL873
出発地：東京(成田)-NRT
到着地：上海(浦東)-PVG
出発時刻： 09:40
到着時刻： 12:00
所要時間：3時間20分
機材：B787-8
機体番号：JA833J
登録年月：2013年10月
座席：ビジネスクラス(1A)
発券：アラスカ航空特典航空券

たった25,000でJALのビジネスクラスを4区間搭乗！3区間目は東京-上海です。シートはSHELL FLAT NEO。寝不足が続き、クアラルンプール-東京と同じく、飛行時間の大半を睡眠にあてた結果...

Date：04/09/2019(Wed)
Airline：Japan Airlines
Flight number：JL873
Departure：Tokyo(Narita)-NRT
Arrival：Shanghai(Pudong)-PVG
Departure time： 09:40
Arrival time： 12:00
Duration：3 hour 20 minutes
Aircraft Type：B787-8
Aircraft number：JA833J
Registration date：Oct 2013
Seat：Business class (1A)
Ticketing：Alaska Airlines Award Tickets

The third section of JAL Business Class that rides 25,000 miles is Tokyo-Shanghai. The seat is SHELL FLAT NEO. As a result of the lack of sleep, Kuala Lumpur-Tokyo, where most of the flight time was put to sleep ...


登机日期：2019年9月4日，星期三
航空公司：日本航空公司
航班号：JL873
出发：东京（成田机场）-NRT
抵达：上海（浦东）-PVG
出发时间：09：40
到货时间：12：00
持续时间：3小时20分钟
设备：B787-8
飞机编号：JA833J
注册日期：2013年10月
座位：商务舱（1A）
票务：阿拉斯加航空公司奖励机票

JAL商务舱的第三部分是25,000英里，是东京 - 上海。 座位是SHELL FLAT NEO。 由于睡眠不足，吉隆坡 - 东京，大部分飞行时间都在这里睡觉......


リアルタイムな情報は、
Twitter
https://twitter.com/voreas_yamamoto

Instagram
http://www.instagram.com/voreas_yamamoto