Search
獸醫助理是一門非常專業的工作..
希望有一套制度規範.國家考試
授予國家級(乙級技術士)證書
希望獸醫助理可以正名為"動物護理士"."獸醫護理士"
在美國的
Veterinary technician(獸醫技術員)
Veterinary assistant (獸醫助理)
基本上就是全能,抽血,上IV Catheter,打針,保定,
餵藥,清理醫院,包藥,用藥說明,飼主衛教..
術前的麻醉準備工作.術中麻醉監控,
協助醫師進行各項外科手術.
術後的照護工作,飼主的衛教...
巡房,檢視住院的情況,適時回報主治醫師..
管理管制藥品,庫存管理......等.
基本上就是除了不能看診開刀以外,其他事情都要做,
這就是"醫師助理"的工作內容..
https://animal-friendly.co/2020/06/03/veterinary-assistant/?fbclid=IwAR1m_Dr-en-0sYn_-suAFvBdb_tcNOSbnCoP4qfSWkHx8z20buz4UfZI27s
徵才機關：國立屏東科技大學
人員區分：其他人員
官職等：無
職系：無
名額：1
性別：不拘
工作地點：90-屏東縣
有效期間：108/12/16~108/12/23
資格條件：
國立屏東科技大學108學年度第1學期徵聘「研究人員」公告(生物科技領域)
聘期自本校通知報到日起聘，以一年一聘為原則，但計畫期限在一年以內者，應依實際所需時間聘用，任期最長以三年為限。惟如因計畫持續需要，得聘期得至計畫執行期限結束時止。
（自本校通知報到日起聘） 公告日期：108年12月16日
■徵聘單位：研究總中心(生物科技領域)
■徵聘職稱：研究助理以上
■名額：1名
■一般資格條件：
1.具教育部認可之國內、外相關系所碩士學位或講師以上教師資格證書者。
2.具碩士學位者，以研究助理職級聘用(比照講師之研究人員)；具博士以上學位，以助理研究員職級聘用(比照助理教授之研究人員) 。
■專長領域或特殊資格條件(含研究著作要求)：
如同時具有以下能力者，尤佳：
1.獸醫師執照。
2.實驗動物操作與動物設施管理。
3.生物科技實驗技術。
4.業界相關工作經驗5年以上。
■Department：General Research Service Center
■Position：Research assistant level (above)
■Vacancy：1
■General Requirement：
1.A master’s degree recognized by the Ministry of Education of the R.O.C. in relevant fields is required or an experience as a lecturer (or above) with an official teaching certificate.
2.MS degree available for research assistant as lecturer. PhD’s degree available for assistant researcher as assistant professor.
■Specialization or Special Qualification(research and publication requirement included)：
If applicants have the following criteria，it is particularly good.
1.Veterinary license.
2. Laboratory animal operation and animal facility mangement.
3. Biotechnology experimental techniques .
4. Industry related work experience for more than 5 yeatrs.
=================================================================
工作項目：
■備註︰
※依本校「校務基金進用研究人員聘任辦法」第六條規定，校務基金進用研究人員聘期，以一年一聘為原則，但計畫期限在一年以內者，應依實際所需時間聘用，任期最長以三年為限。惟如因計畫持續需要，得聘期得至計畫執行期限結束時止。校務基金進用研究人員辦理續聘時，應提出聘任期間執行研究成果績效報告，並載明要求事項及檢據證明文件資料。
一、以上應徵之「一般資格條件」及「專長領域或特殊資格條件(含研究著作要求)」，須於公告截止日前（108年12月23日）已具有碩士/博士學位或教育部核頒講師/助理教授以上教師資格證書及相關佐證資料。
二、以上應徵之「專長領域獲特殊資格條件」中有關「實務工作經驗」之審核，本校將依教育部訂定公布「技專校院專業科目或技術科目之教師業界實務工作經驗認定標準」規定辦理。
三、報名期間︰自公告日起至108年12月23日止截止收件。
四、報名方式︰報名方式︰一律採書面方式報名，收件至報名截止日止。
(一) 郵寄方式報名：以郵戳為憑，請寄送至91201屏東縣內埔鄉老埤村學府路1號，國立屏東科技大學人事室收。
(二) 親送方式報名：以本校人事室「職缺收件章」收件日期為憑，請於報名截止日前之本校工作日期間親送至本校行政中心二樓人事室，交由人事人員收執，並加蓋「職缺收件章」。
※ 應檢附之證件不齊或逾期者，均不予受理。
五、聯絡電話︰08-7703202轉分機6112 本校人事室蘇先生。
六、應徵信封右上角請務必註明「應徵者姓名」及「應徵單位（領域）」；資格符合者由徵聘單位辦理後續審查事宜，不合者恕不退件及函復。如未獲錄取時需返還書面應徵資料，請附足額回郵信封以利郵寄。
七、報名需繳交表件︰(徵聘單位另有資料需求者，請依其需求辦理)
(一)個人基本資料表（請詳細註明通訊地址、聯絡電話、行動電話及電子郵件信箱）。
(二)最近五年內著作一覽表。
(三)最高學歷畢業證書影本，畢業學校如係國外學歷須為教育部所認可且經我國駐外單位驗證有案者，須於公告截止日前取得之學歷始予採認。
(四)檢附相關實務工作經驗之證明文件影本。（須於公告截止日前之實務工作經驗始予採認）
(五)最高學歷歷年成績單影本，畢業學校如係國外學歷須為教育部所認可且經我國駐外單位驗證有案者。
(六)其他有利於聘審之資格證明文件。
(七)國立屏東科技大學個人資料蒐集聲明暨同意書。
※※（一 ~ 七）項資料請勿膠封，使用長尾夾固定成冊即可※※
八、請應徵者詳閱「本校個人資料蒐集聲明暨同意書」，確認同意相關事項後簽名，並隨同履歷資料繳件。
九、前述第七項（1款）所需之「個人基本資料表」表格，刊登於本校人事室網站首頁（網址http://personnel.npust.edu.tw/bin/home.php）最新消息、徵才求職區，請自行下載相關表格使用，並另行以E-mail方式逕傳送以下研究總中心承辦人：
研究總中心：ining@mail.npust.edu.tw
十、本校聘任前依性侵害犯罪加害人登記報到查訪及查閱辦法第14條之規定，應申請查閱有無性侵害犯罪紀錄。
十一、本公告同時刊登於下列網站：
(一)行政院人事行政總處網址http://www.dgpa.gov.tw/點選「事求人」。
(二)本校首頁網址http://mportal.npust.edu.tw/bin/home.php 點選「求才資訊」。
(三)本校人事室網址http://personnel.npust.edu.tw/bin/home.php點選「最新消息」及「徵才求職區」。
(四)「台灣就業通」網址https://www.taiwanjobs.gov.tw/Internet/index/index.aspx 點選「找工作」。
(五)「104人力銀行」網址https://www.104.com.tw/index.cfm。
(六)「教育部全國大專教育人才網」網址https://tjn.moe.edu.tw/index.php/點選「職缺訊息」。
(七)「科技部網站」網址https://www.most.gov.tw/?l=ch/點選「動態資訊/求才訊息」。
<詳細內容及相關報名表格請至本校人事室網頁參閱、下載。
網址：http://personnel.npust.edu.tw/bin/home.php 點選「最新消息」>
一封給國家地理頻道「Dog: Impossible」節目負責人的公開信:
An open letter to the leadership team of Nat Geo Wild Dog Impossible:
Translate: Yu-Hwa Su 翻譯: 蘇昱華
Proof: Yen Ke 校對: 葛雁
The International Association of Animal Behavior Consultants (IAABC) applauds National Geographic’s mission to offer intelligent, relevant and captivating non-fiction entertainment. This is a crucial objective, especially as an introduction to children and viewers largely relying on television for their scientific information.
國際動物行為諮詢師協會（IAABC）對於國家地理頻道致力於提供電視觀眾正確知識與科學內容表示讚賞。這是一個非常重要的目標，特別是對依賴電視得到這些知識的兒童與其他觀眾們來說。
However, your stated mission is in direct conflict with your show Dog: Impossible. In fact, the irresponsible treatment of the dogs and people on this show flies in the face of all best practices in animal training and behavior. Rather than promoting science and scientifically-proven methodology, Dog: Impossible sacrifices learning science for more dramatic television.
然而，貴頻道所提供的節目「Dog: Impossible」卻與貴頻道「提供正確的科學知識」的一貫立場衝突。節目中對犬隻以及飼主的不負責處理方式與應有的動物訓練及行為操作的準則相違背。「Dog: Impossible」並沒有提倡科學以及經科學驗證的方法，這節目犧牲了對科學的學習，轉而追求吸睛的電視節目效果。
Matt Beisner appears to have no credentials or education in training and behavior, yet he refers to himself as a behaviorist. His claim that “energy is the one language that every animal on the planet speaks” makes clear he is not one.
Matt Beisner並沒有動物訓練或行為學的相關學習經歷與證照，卻宣稱自己是一位行為學家。從他的主張：「能量是地球上所有動物都會使用的共通語言」，便能明白他並不是行為學家。
His statement, “You don’t need tricks, you don’t need treats, you don’t need force,” shows just how unaware of his own actions he is. His misuse of scientific terminology leads viewers to believe they are learning demonstrated, safe and accepted strategies in helping their dogs. In fact, Mr. Beisner is forcing these dogs from start to finish of each episode. His own “tricks” are that of over-stressing dogs until they’re in a state referred to in psychology and science as “learned helplessness.”
他主張「你不需要技巧、零食、或蠻力 (去訓練狗)」，這顯示出他對於自己的所做所為一無所知。他對科學術語的濫用也會誤導觀眾，讓觀眾以為他們正在學習經證實有效而且安全可接受的方法來幫助狗狗。但這位訓練師在每一集節目上從頭到尾都是在逼迫這些狗，而他所擁有的「技巧」，就是讓狗進入過度緊迫的狀態，直到牠們進入心理學和科學上所指的「習得無助」（learned helplessness）狀態。
Learned helplessness occurs when a subject endures repeated aversive stimuli beyond their control. Originally thought to show a subject's acceptance of their powerlessness, for more than half a century it’s been known instead to be the emotional “shutting down” of the subject. Anxiety, clinical depression, and related mental illnesses are common consequences of this technique in humans.
「習得無助」發生在動物沒有任何控制權，且重複地被施加嫌惡刺激的時候。最初，人們認為習得無助狀態意味著動物「接受」了自身無法改變、無能為力的情形，超過半個世紀以來，人們認為這是動物情緒「關機（shutting down）」的表現。在人類身上，習得無助的常見結果包含焦慮、憂鬱症、以及相關的心理疾病。
Allow us to note some aspects of the trailer and his shows, but first, to point out a few well-documented and commonly understood aspects of dog behavior so that we may better make our points understood.
在我們解釋為何我們認為此節目的預告片與內容不適當之前，我們希望先闡述一些正確的犬隻行為常識，以便您能更理解我們的觀點。
Canine body language indicating stress and severe stress:
顯示出壓力以及嚴重緊迫的犬隻肢體語言：
Compressed bodies
Dry, raspy panting
Wide, open eyes with dilated pupils
Heavy drooling
“Whipping” head and body back, pushing off a handler in order to get away
Growling
Fighting
Biting
縮緊身體
急促的喘氣
睜大雙眼、散瞳
大量流口水
甩頭、用前爪推抱著狗的人以退後、試圖掙脫
低吼
打架
開咬
Eleven seconds into the trailer, Mr. Beisner rubs his hands together, smiling, and says, “This is going to be gnarly.” All professionals know from that statement what the series will spotlight: A poorly (if at all) educated non-professional pushing dogs way beyond therapeutic limits, in the name of “results.”
在預告片11秒的地方，Beisner先生搓手並笑著說「等一下會很精采喔」。所有專業人士都知道這句話代表這個節目的亮點將會是：一名缺乏適當教育的訓練師，逼迫狗到超過其能承受的極限，並把這樣的結果稱為是良好的改善。
Flooding, the term for inundating a subject with their fears, phobias and triggers, is ethically questionable at best, cruel and unnecessary, always. There's also a common danger of spontaneous recovery of the phobia. This is because flooding doesn't replace the fear-response with a different response, it just replaces it with no response. “No response” is simply suppression, not cure.
「洪水法」，指的是故意將動物置於恐慌或恐懼的觸發刺激情境，這樣的方法不道德、殘忍、而且沒必要。另外，恐懼的自發性回復（spontaneous recovery）也是洪水法常見的風險，這是因為洪水法並沒有將害怕的反應重新制約成其他不同的情緒行為，它只是讓動物沒有反應。「沒有反應」只是壓抑，動物並沒有因此感到不害怕或恐慌。
Throughout the trailer dogs are flooded with aversive stimuli such as other dogs, people and equipment, something an ethical professional would not, and could not do per any answerable guidelines of animal training and behavior care.
在整個預告片中，狗狗被迫接受各種嫌惡刺激的洪水法訓練，例如其他狗、其他人類和物品，這是具有道德的專業訓練人員不會做的，任何負責任的動物訓練及行為照護準則也不會如此建議。
Systematic desensitization and counterconditioning, gradual exposure to the feared object, and replacement of a negative emotional association with a more pleasant one, are the recommended techniques used to treat such fear and aggression cases, per all legitimate veterinary, training and behavior organizations.
系統性減敏與反制約，也就是逐步與少量的讓狗接觸其本來會害怕的事物，並且將引發的少量負面情緒與其非常喜愛的事物配對給予，是用來處理恐懼及攻擊案例的建議方法，也是每個好的獸醫師、訓練及行為機構會推薦的方法。
Beisner’s statement that “We know at the Zen Yard that dogs help other dogs come out of their shell and face their fear and get past their aggression” isn’t just scientifically unsupportable, his words ring hollow during the very scene playing while he says those words: Beisner restraining one dog, while his co-host pulls a leashed dog to the first in a completely unnatural gesture perhaps intended to either mimic natural dog greeting (it doesn’t) or to flood the heavily drooling dog who is unable to move or get away. The dogs end up in a fight. They have been set up to fail, and the outcome is inevitable.
Beisner宣稱「我們在Zen Yard（他的訓練中心）知道狗會去幫助其他狗融入外界、面對牠們的恐懼並且克服攻擊行為」，這句話不只是缺乏科學支持，在影片中他講出這句話時搭配的畫面，亦表現出他的說詞缺乏支持：Beisner限制了第一隻狗的行動，由節目的共同主持人以牽繩將另一隻狗以一個完全不自然的姿勢拉到第一隻狗身邊，他們可能是在試著模仿狗狗自然的社交打招呼行為（但並不是），或使用洪水法訓練那隻狂流口水（顯示牠很緊張）並且無法逃脫的狗。最終兩隻狗打起來，訓練師製造的這個情境，讓失敗的結果無可避免。
In the trailer, the assistant host, Stefanie DiOrio, states, “Nervousness can easily turn to fear which can lead to aggression.” This is an accurate statement, which is why it’s so confusing that the entire show would be predicated on pushing dogs to the very edge of survivable stress and into predictable aggression, doubling down on the issues that their owners are struggling with.
在預告片中，節目的共同主持人Stefanie DiOrio說「緊張不安很容易變成真正的恐懼，並且導致攻擊行為」，這句話是正確的，但也讓人更加困惑為何整個節目的走向都在將狗推向牠們所能承受壓力的極限、觸發根本可預測的攻擊行為、並使飼主所面對的問題加倍惡化。
We know that the dramatic changes in behavior, from stressed and wildly aggressive to “calm” dogs, make for compelling TV. To an average pet owner it looks like these dogs are making huge improvements. All clients just want their dog to “Stop being aggressive.” However, we also know that behavior suppression is not the same as behavior modification, that a stressed and shut-down dog is a more dangerous animal than one who is actively showing aggression, and that the long-term prognosis of this kind of intervention is poor for both the client and their dog.
我們知道行為上戲劇性的變化，從一隻緊迫且兇猛攻擊的狗轉變成“冷靜”的狗，這個過程代表了高收視率，在不十分了解行為學的飼主眼中看來，這些狗狗似乎有巨大的進步。飼主都只是希望他們的狗「不要再有攻擊性」，然而我們也知道單純抑制攻擊行為的出現，並不是真正的行為改善技術。舉例來說一隻高壓力但看似沒有反應的狗，遠比一隻會表現出攻擊性的狗要危險許多 (譯註: 因為這樣的狗可能會沒有徵兆地開咬)，因此這種抑制攻擊行為的訓練法，以長遠來看對飼主以及狗狗都是有害的。
It is also worth pointing out that, like his predecessor, Mr Beisner’s assessment of cause for much of the issues he’s asked to address is simple, made especially clear in episode 4 where he not only saves a dog, he “saves a marriage:” Women are unable to effectively lead, must be stronger, must change their ways.
另一個值得注意的事是Beisner先生，如同他在同一個頻道的前輩，西薩，對導致問題的原因評估也過於簡化，例如第四集中他聲稱他不只拯救了狗狗，他還「拯救了這段婚姻」，因為女主人無法有效的領導狗狗，因此她必須更堅強，必須改變他們之間的相處模式。
Misogyny, it seems, cures dog behavior problems. Real exploration and explanation regarding the antecedents and consequences around behaviors are ignored in favor of client blaming.
這段貶抑女性的解釋，看起來似乎能改善犬隻的行為問題，然而關於行為問題真正的前因後果卻被指責客戶所取代，並沒有真正的被探討與解釋。
The clients on the show represent thousands of clients throughout the US and beyond with whom we work every day, helping them to help their dogs. Far from being dogs “other people won’t work with,” the dogs on your show are exactly the clients and dogs that IAABC Certified Dog Behavior Consultants, as well as all members of the American College of Veterinary Behaviorists, Certified Applied Animal Behaviorists, and other certified behavior specialists see and successfully work with every day.
節目中所出現的客戶正代表了我們日常工作中所會幫助的人們與他們的狗，呈現的就是我們在美國跟其他國家的上千位客戶。節目中所出現的這些有著行為問題的狗絕對不是「其他訓練師都不想要處理的狗狗」，事實上這些客戶與狗正是IAABC認證的狗行為諮詢師、美國獸醫行為學家、認證的應用動物行為學家或是其他受認證的行為學專家，每天工作的日常。
We do so using the best practices of our field (see https://m.iaabc.org/about/ethics/), adopted by the leading behavior and training organizations, without psychologically or physically harming the animals we work with.
我們在這個領域也使用最嚴謹的訓練師專業道德守則（英文版參見https://m.iaabc.org/about/ethics/，中文版參見https://reurl.cc/72eVkl），這個守則受領先的行為及訓練機構所採用，使訓練師與行為諮詢師在工作時，不對我們經手的動物造成生理或心理上的傷害。
The IAABC urges Nat Geo WILD to stop promoting this public miseducation. The tactics employed in the name of entertainment are unnecessarily harsh and potentially dangerous to the public, and they teach yet another generation of Nat Geo watchers absolutely incorrect and harmful practices.
IAABC呼籲國家地理頻道（Nat Geo WILD）停止傳播此系列誤導公眾的資訊。以娛樂包裝節目的策略對於觀眾是不必要的粗糙而且有潛在風險的，甚至是向頻道的年輕一代觀眾灌輸完全不正確且有害的做法。
It remains a mystery why your network is so intent on harming dogs. After years of Cesar Milan, to now bring in a man equally unskilled, who equates terrified, angry or entrapped dogs to his own addiction history is remarkable. Are we really satisfied conflating ego with compassion, self-focus with an understanding of animal behavior? Is this the “science” your mission stands for?
我們仍然不知為何貴頻道這麼多年來如此堅持持續傷害狗的這些作為。在西薩 (Cesar Milan) 的節目播映多年之後，現在又引進一個同樣缺乏正確訓練技巧，以自身藥物成癮困擾歷史去錯誤的同理恐懼或憤怒的狗的人。我們能接受一個膨脹自我，而非真正擁有同情心、適當自我聚焦、了解動物行為的「專業人士」嗎？這就是貴節目所宣稱的「科學」立場嗎？
The damage Nat Geo is doing to dogs by choosing this type of programming is astounding. We can only assume that the producers are unaware of this, as it’s hard to imagine such harm and cruelty would be deliberate.
國家地理頻道選擇製作這類節目對於狗狗的傷害甚鉅，我們只能假定節目製作人並沒有意識到這點，因為我們難以想像會有人故意去做這樣有害且殘忍的事情。
Would you show a reality program on heart surgery with a photogenic “self-taught” practitioner, simply stating the star was not a doctor before showing him mutilating a real patient?
想問貴節目是否會採用一個上鏡的“自學”外科醫生錄製心臟手術的實境節目，告知觀眾他並非真正的醫生，然後播放他對病患動刀的畫面？
I leave you with the clearest image of suffering and abuse from your trailer: the Aussie, stressed to the breaking point, thick ropes of drool streaming from its mouth, being choked by a slip lead to compensate for the host’s inability to even effectively muzzle a dog. This dog is at the point of collapse. This dog is being tortured, and that is not hysteria. That is an assessment by any educated measure.
作為結尾，我希望指出貴節目預告片中明確顯示出狗狗受苦或受虐的畫面：那隻澳洲牧羊犬已經瀕臨壓力的極限，您可以看到口水掛在其嘴邊 (大量口水為壓力徵兆)，口罩因為沒有確實的配戴而滑脫，導致牠被勒到快要窒息，已在崩潰邊緣。具備專業與適當教育的人員指出，這隻狗因在節目上被虐待而情緒崩潰，並非其本身歇斯底里。
Please stop this cruel and dangerous programming. To do otherwise is to support that self-taught heart surgery and all the consequences it would bring; that this show is currently bringing to families struggling with their dogs.
Professionals refer to Cesar Milan’s influence on dog training as “job security” because so many dogs ruined or made far worse by his teachings are brought to us by well-intentioned, often weeping owners desperate for real help. Often it is too late.
請停止這系列殘酷且危險的節目。否則貴節目就等同於支持前面舉例的自學的心臟外科「醫師」進行手術一樣，這些危險的後果正由觀眾與他們的狗承擔。專業訓犬人士將西薩米蘭對訓犬的影響戲稱為「工作保障」，因為太多飼主使用了他教授的技巧後，狗狗的狀況變得更糟，而哭著迫切尋找真正的協助，此時通常都為時已晚。
We do not want more work due to this same phenomenon.
我們不想要因為這個節目帶來類似影響而接到更多工作。
We’d be happy to provide you with any education and resources you need to inform your producers about what would qualify as responsible, effective, safe and thoughtful work with the same “red zone” dogs you sell so well.
但我們很樂意提供貴頻道任何需要的教育與資源，讓您們的節目製作人對訓犬工作應有的品質有所理解，例如負責、有效、安全，並且理解到對於在節目中出現的這些「危險」犬隻，事實上有更合理的訓練方法。
Thank you for your consideration.
謝謝您的閱讀與理解。
Marjie Alonso
Executive Director, IAABC
For the Board of Directors
Marjie Alonso
IAABC執行長
代表董事會發言
All veterinary technicians work under the supervision of a licensed veterinarian. While a veterinary technician can assist in performing a wide variety of tasks ... ... <看更多>
A Veterinary Assistant supports the Lead Veterinarian and other technicians in all aspects of animal care to ensure animals receive the care and attention ... ... <看更多>
veterinary assistant 在 Veterinary Assistant Job Description: Salary, Skills, & More 的相關結果
They're responsible for feeding, bathing, and exercising the animals, and they restrain them during examinations and treatment. Vet assistants, ... ... <看更多>