Interview with A Founder: Conor McLaughlin (Co-founder of 99.co)
By David Wu (AppWorks Associate)
Conor McLaughlin was previously the Co-founder and CTO of 99.co, the real estate marketplace in Singapore and Indonesia. He spent six and a half years at the startup, whose backers include Sequoia Capital, 500 Startups, and Facebook co-founder Eduardo Saverin, helping to grow it into a $100 million company. As a member of AppWorks Accelerator #21, he is currently working on his next big project, a yet-to-be-named language learning startup.
【What advice do you have for first-time founders?】
First, you need to decide: do I want to run a sprint or a marathon? For a sprint, you may be open to acquisition from the beginning, delay non-startup aspects of your life, give yourself two years where you drop everything to test an idea, choose to raise more money earlier on and thus be more diluted, or do anything else that implies a shorter time horizon. Typically 1-5 years - this can lead to a major boon in a short period of time if executed well. If you decide you are in the sprinting business, you will most likely be pushed toward binary outcomes because of how many investors and employees you have on your cap table. As a first-time founder, you need to be clear with yourself on what you are willing to put on the line. As Reid Hoffman says, it’s like jumping off a cliff and building a plane on the way down… hopefully you build a plane in time.
If you are running a marathon, you are deciding that your competitive advantage is consistency over intensity. You are in this for 10, 15 years. With this time horizon, you will realize you need ways to metabolize stress and maintain emotional, spiritual, and mental health. You need to maintain relationships with friends, family, and romantic partners. When you are looking at this 10 year period, you realize the people around you can only put up with so much. Unfortunately, while work is something people can generally bounce back from, there are many things in life where you cannot - an example is your relationship with your partner. If you’re going to run a marathon, you need to be clear with yourself about what time you have for other aspects of your life and what time you have for your company. Eventually you need to learn what the right speed is where you can run as long as possible. It’s amazing how often it is that those people that keep going, assuming you have chosen the right problem to solve, eventually find daylight. Part of that is just lasting long enough.
Second, you need to revisit and continually ask yourself: should I still be running a sprint or a marathon? Circumstances change. Maybe you sprinted for the first two years to secure interesting results and funding; now it's time to transition to a marathon and clean up the life debt a bit. Or inversely, maybe you're finally leaving the trough of sorrow and it's time to sprint for a bit. Most founders will be in a long distance race with periodic sprinting. From my observation, founders most often stop because of two reasons: They either A) run out of money or B) run out of energy. There’s plenty of advice out there for scenario A (hint: don’t). But in my experience, scenario B is far more pernicious and dangerous to would-be successful founders. If you are in a marathon but fail to pace yourself and run it like one long sprint, you are unlikely to make it to the end.
Much founder advice speaks to this: Don’t let your startup make you fat. Exercise 5-10% of the time. Pick up a hobby outside of your startup. Go home for holidays. All of it leads back to one thing: You need to take care of yourself. Because injury will be far worse for your progress than being a little slower. “Slow is smooth, smooth is fast”, as the US Navy Seals say. This is surprisingly difficult advice for intrinsically motivated founders to follow, because in the event of failure, it makes them vulnerable to the thought, “Well, you didn’t work hard enough.” But for those that already have the hustle, your job is to avoid the moment of epiphany where you look in the mirror and think, “This isn’t worth it.”
All founders will have to sacrifice some things. The point is to not sacrifice everything. It will make you more resilient. Not less. It will give you the space to see situations more objectively and make better decisions. And most importantly, it will let you love what you do because it will remind you that the work isn’t just in service of yourself, it’s in the service of others. I do not think you can judge hard work over a day, or even a year, but I do think you can judge hard work over 5-10 years. Hard work is not just about the next 1-2 months. There will be times when you need to run as fast as possible, but if that is happening all the time you are probably not being smart about the situation. So don’t hurt yourself, be consistent, keep disciplined, and keep going.
Lastly, focus on your metaskills. Public speaking, reading, writing - skills applied in every aspect of your life. Generally what they reflect is learning how to think better. As a founder you need to think about - how can I think more clearly, be more creative, rigorous, analytical? As Warren Buffett and others have said: I have never seen a successful person that did not read as often as they could. Actual books and long form scare a lot of people. That’s your competitive advantage. Read blog posts from smart people, follow smart people on Twitter, listen to podcasts. Always be focused on how you can develop yourself to think better. Fostering the habit of improving your thinking will foster discipline in yourself. And discipline will let you turn that rigorous thinking into action.
【I imagine running the “race” has been especially tough this year. How have you gotten through 2020?】
I have leaned on routine and community. I’ve spent a lot of time trying to foster discipline in myself. I make my bed every morning, meditate every morning, make sure that I go to the gym 3-4 times a week. There’s so much uncertainty in both the world and the entrepreneurial space. Keeping certain things consistent gives me a spine to my life that I can fall back on. If I’m not feeling well, my discipline takes over and I’ll go to the gym. That helps me relieve stress - falling back to routine and having some mainstays of consistency and structure.
And community - it’s been the big mental health zeitgeist of this year. Everyone is recognizing that without the people around us, our mental health diminishes. Joining AppWorks was very intentional so I could surround myself with like-minded people who could question me, hold me accountable, and inspire me. And also just forming personal connections where I felt that I was still taking care of my mental health by connecting with others. Being a founder is an incredibly lonely journey. In the early days, there’s not a lot of people around. Later, when you do hire lots of people, you need to be the boss, the leader - for certain things, you can’t tell the employees everything, and even if you do, there will always be a bit of distance. You need people to relate to - people want to be seen for who they are, and appreciated for what they give. When you are a founder, sometimes it’s hard to feel that you are seen. So I intentionally put myself in situations where I can be inspired, be held accountable, and more importantly connect with others, and feel that I’m not alone. And that me and my co-founders are part of a communal journey with those around us.
【When you talk about how to run the race, I get the sense that you’re drawing from previous experiences and, perhaps, mistakes. What are the mistakes you’ve made in your founder journey and the takeaways?】
I think you could take a calendar, point to a random week, and we could list out all the mistakes from that week (laughs). I do subscribe to Steve Jobs’ philosophy: mistakes will happen, but mistakes happening means we are making decisions. Not making decisions is perhaps the biggest mistake. It’s often the reason for frustration, loss of speed, loss of momentum - so many of the issues you encounter in startups. Not making enough mistakes is probably the #1 mistake that I’ve made.
Second, going back to my advice to first-time founders, is not understanding what game I’m playing. Not understanding that all the money in the world is not going to be worth it if your spouse or partner decides to leave you because you have relegated them to a second-class citizen in your life. I think I forgot that at points. There is more to life than just the company.
Third, be careful about who you choose to work with. At minimum, if you’re doing a standard 8-9 hours at the office five times a week, that’s a lot of time with those people. You want to like the people that you work with - you want to know they’re high integrity, you want to respect their values, and you want to have common values. Choosing the right people that give you energy rather than take it away just makes running the marathon so much easier.
【We welcome all AI, Blockchain, or Southeast Asia founders to join AppWorks Accelerator: https://bit.ly/3r4lLR8 】
同時也有2部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過3萬的網紅POPA Channel,也在其Youtube影片中提到,英語這種國際語言世界通行,但每個地方總有不同,有美式、英式……,不知何時開始,還有「港式」……香港人之間溝通無間,但外國人肯定聽得一頭霧水,我們明明由三歲開始學英文,但學了十幾二十年,都無法好好運用英語,到底是為什麼呢? 參考資料 Monica Goh. (英國文化協會幼兒英語課程高級導師). ...
「second language acquisition and second language learning」的推薦目錄:
- 關於second language acquisition and second language learning 在 AppWorks Facebook 的最佳貼文
- 關於second language acquisition and second language learning 在 Alexander Wang 王梓沅英文 Facebook 的精選貼文
- 關於second language acquisition and second language learning 在 Eric's English Lounge Facebook 的精選貼文
- 關於second language acquisition and second language learning 在 POPA Channel Youtube 的最佳貼文
- 關於second language acquisition and second language learning 在 POPA Channel Youtube 的精選貼文
second language acquisition and second language learning 在 Alexander Wang 王梓沅英文 Facebook 的精選貼文
#留言索取學習僵化paper #擁抱你的錯誤
【會有些文法錯誤永遠改不了、有些發音永遠發不好嗎?】
✔︎ 文章 highlight: 錯誤是什麼?錯誤是學生努力、嘗試用自己的方式理解這個語言的軌跡。
「若怎樣怎樣,就可能會學習僵化 (fossilization)」是很多台灣老師、甚至是教授,常常用來講述學習者「永遠無法將一個錯誤根除」的可怕現象。
在紐約哥倫比亞大學求學時,我的教授其實就是現在全世界在研究學習僵化的最知名的學者,也因此我的碩士論文寫的主題也是學習僵化。因此今天想跟教授、老師們、以及在學習英文中的你,分析如何看待「錯誤」。
Fossilization 這個詞最早由 Larry Selinker 教授在 1972 年 Interlanguage 一篇論文當中提出。當初對這個現象的定義還很粗糙不明確,但很不幸的,這也是99% 台灣教授在念博班時、英文老師上教程時學到的定義。
Fossilization 基本上就是「學習者將在某些錯誤上永遠無法根除」的現象。相反地,Dr. Selinker 也將那些「最終會消失」的錯誤(像是錯講成 Do you know where is the restroom?) ,名為 stabilization,比一輩子註定的 fossilization 還要樂觀許多。
即便如此,很多英語系教授跟老師們,還是喜歡講比較悲觀的 fossilization. 我要特別呼籲英語系教授、台灣英文老師們,別亂用「學習僵化」 (fossilization) 這個詞彙。
時間快轉,在 2004 年時,Larry Selinker 的學生 Dr. ZhaoHong Han 出版了 Fossilization In Adult Second Language Acquisition (第二語言習得中的學習僵化現象) 一書,重新將學習僵化定義為:Cessation of learning in spite of adequate motivation
to learn, abundant exposure to input, and ample opportunities for communicative practice (Han, 2004).
意思就是,要在有 3 個條件都滿足,錯誤仍然一直存在時,我們才能初步判定可能有學習僵化的可能性:
(1) 學習者有有強烈動機
(2) 有很多的輸入 (input)
(3) 充足的練習機會。
在台灣的學習環境下,這3個條件常常沒有一次滿足。如果只是學習者一直犯一個錯 (像是一直說 I suggest you to…或是 discuss 後面亂加 about… 口說裡頭 Although 後面一直加 but ) 我們頂多能說是 stablization,身為老師的我們,要做的事情反而是更努力用其他的方式,幫助學生學得更好,而不是給他們下判決。
有學習僵化現象嗎?有(我會再寫一篇文章)。但在條件沒滿足之前,不應該將錯誤看成什麼罪大惡極的東西。
錯誤是什麼?錯誤是學生努力、嘗試用自己的方式理解的軌跡。
如果你對於 fossilization 有興趣,請在下面留言「我對學習僵化的 paper 有興趣」我會內信給你喔!
second language acquisition and second language learning 在 Eric's English Lounge Facebook 的精選貼文
[教育資源] 學術英語: 自我學習之路
進階學習者和英文老師們!
想學習更多關於如何提升自身學術英文能力嗎?來試試以下由Dr. Stephen Krashen提供的免費課程吧!
★★★★★★★★★★★★
Stephen Krashen是一位語言學家、教育學研究者以及活動家。Stephen Krashen博士已出版近五百篇論文與書籍,為第二語言學習、雙語教育與閱讀領域做出貢獻。最近,Dr. Krashen推廣在第二語言習得時運用自由志願性閱讀,他表示:「這是我們在不論第一或第二語言教育中最有力的工具。」Dr. Krashen博士目前為南加州大學的榮譽教授。
Stephen Krashen is a linguist, educational researcher, and activist. Dr. Krashen has published nearly 500 papers and books, contributing to the fields of second-language acquisition, bilingual education, and reading. He is credited with introducing various influential concepts and terms in the study of second-language acquisition, including the acquisition-learning hypothesis, the input hypothesis, the monitor hypothesis, the affective filter, and the natural order hypothesis. Most recently, Krashen promotes the use of free voluntary reading during second-language acquisition, which he says “is the most powerful tool we have in language education, first and second.” Dr. Krashen is currently professor emeritus at University of Southern California.
★★★★★★★★★★★★
課程描述:
學術語言能力包括詞彙、文法以及學術或專業語言的話語風格。 傳統的教學方法包括描述語言、準備材料和準確地教授學術語言,但這些並不奏效。 無論你是在教授大學生,或是希望提高自己的學術語言能力,請加入Stephen Krashen錄製的四堂iTDi高級教學技能課程,以找出有效的學習方法。
Academic language proficiency consists of vocabulary, grammar, and a discourse style of academic, or professional language. Traditional teaching approaches include describing the language, preparing materials and explicitly teaching academic language. This has never worked. Whether you are teaching university students or just hoping to improve your own academic language proficiency, join Stephen Krashen in these four recorded sessions from his iTDi Advanced Teaching Skills course to find out what does work.
要熟練使用學術語言,我們必須:1)了解學術語言的詞彙、文法和話語風格,以及2)了解特定主題的語言。 精通語言的使用者還會採用各種策略來幫助他們的學術語言和主題學習。
To be proficient in using academic language, we have to 1) know the vocabulary, grammar and discourse style of academic language and 2) know the language of our specific subject matter. Proficient language users also employ a range of strategies that help them acquire academic language and subject-matter learning.
★★★★★★★★★★★★
免費課程連結: https://bit.ly/3fJ8TcL
★★★★★★★★★★★★
Dr. Stephen Krashen 的語言教育研討會
https://bit.ly/2N49fOF
所有免費英文課程:
https://bit.ly/3hx05Iu
破解英文學習上的迷思:
https://youtu.be/fPP887v8EWw
如何教英語:
https://bit.ly/37q098n
免費TESOL課程:
https://bit.ly/30H8Ytc
★★★★★★★★★★★★
What is "COMPELLING comprehensible input"?
http://www.sdkrashen.com/content/articles/the_compelling_input_hypothesis.pdf
https://youtu.be/au4CoCLi1Is
★★★★★★★★★★★★
教育時評:http://bit.ly/39ABON9
second language acquisition and second language learning 在 POPA Channel Youtube 的最佳貼文
英語這種國際語言世界通行,但每個地方總有不同,有美式、英式……,不知何時開始,還有「港式」……香港人之間溝通無間,但外國人肯定聽得一頭霧水,我們明明由三歲開始學英文,但學了十幾二十年,都無法好好運用英語,到底是為什麼呢?
參考資料
Monica Goh. (英國文化協會幼兒英語課程高級導師). Tips for parents helping their child learn English at home
Saka, D. (2015, February 17). British Council Interviews Stephen Krashen part 2 of 3. Retrieved from YouTube
S. D., Krashen. (2009, July). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition.
R. W., McCaul. (2016, February 11). Can we learn a second language like we learned our first? Retrieved from British Council
S., Krashen. (n.d.). The Comprehension Hypothesis Extended. In Input Matters in SLA. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. (pp. 81-94).
S., Krashen. (2004). The Case for Narrow Reading. In Language Magazine 3(5):17-19.
second language acquisition and second language learning 在 POPA Channel Youtube 的精選貼文
在香港,有很多家長經常跟子女講英文,甚至由孩子一出世開始,便已急不及待的只講英文,一句廣東話也不說。務求令英語成為小朋友的母語,增強他們入學面試的勝算,令他們在競爭激烈的求學生涯裡,可以贏在起跑線。
但語言不單止是用來溝通,更是發展認知能力,學習邏輯思考、社交和情緒管理的重要工具,如果家長只用外語跟子女溝通,放棄自己的母語,對小朋友會有甚麼影響?
美國堪薩斯大學兩位專攻兒童語言發展的科學家,於80年代做了一個實驗,研究0至3歲的語言環境,對幼兒將來的智力發展以及學習能力會有甚麼影響。
參考資料
Hart, B., & Risley, T. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore: P.H. Brookes.
second language acquisition and second language learning 在 Second Language Acquisition vs. Second Language Learning 的相關結果
Learning, as mentioned before means a conscious process of trying to acquire a second language . Acquisition means an unconscious process . Second language ... ... <看更多>
second language acquisition and second language learning 在 Second-language acquisition - Wikipedia 的相關結果
Second -language acquisition (SLA), sometimes called second-language learning — otherwise referred to as L2 (language 2) acquisition, is ... ... <看更多>
second language acquisition and second language learning 在 Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning 的相關結果
Monitor Theory hypothesizes that adults have two independent systems for developing ability in second languages, subconscious language acquisition and conscious ... ... <看更多>