Reposting the article about firm and soft edges in drawing, with English translation.
Exchange with social media friends – Firm and Soft Edges in Drawing
答網友問 - 素描中的虛與實
Dear Mr. Yim, I love drawing and have watched your drawing video lessons many times. I’m mesmerized by the firm and soft edges and texture in your drawing and would like to emulate, but it’s hard for me to put the theory of firm and soft edges into practice. What is your advice for mastering firm and soft edges in drawing?
冉茂芹老师,您好,我是名素描爱好者,在网上观看您的素描的视频已经许多次,您画里的虚实让我着迷,想学习到,但在自己的绘画实践中总是找不到虚实的感觉。
所以想问问冉茂芹老师,您画里的虚实,有没有什么秘诀可以掌握呢?
My reply:
Firm and soft edges in drawing is an artistic concept.
The firm and soft edges are but manifestations of the subject in the artist’s eye. The subject has its own existence regardless of firm or soft edges. Take the rose for example. It’s neither beautiful nor ugly in itself. We think roses are beautiful because people project their own emotions and aesthetics onto the roses. Firm and soft edges are a result of human observation and representation.
答:
畫中的虛與實是一個概念。是一個藝術的概念。虛與實的作畫者眼中是物體呈現的一種現象。而物體本身是一個自在的存在,無所謂虛與實。就如玫瑰花,它本身並無美不美的問題,我們認為玫瑰花美,是人將感情、審美意識投放在玫瑰花身上的緣故。有人的觀察和描繪,才有“虛 ”與“實 ”。
The phenomenon of firm and soft edges is caused by the structure of the human eye. The way a concave lens is used for focusing is why sights can be in or out of focus. When people look at a drawing or painting with just a single field view, they instinctively try to define a hierarchy for the firm and soft edges.
虛與實的現像導源於人類眼睛的構造,這種凸鏡聚焦的構造使我們的觀察有焦距清晰與離焦模糊之別。因而,人們觀看單一視界的畫幅時,本能地要求有主次虛實之分。幾乎是不可或缺的因素。
When untrained artists observe objects, their gaze skips from focal point to focal point, so there is no hierarchy and no difference between the firm and soft edges. In other words, they are not observing the scene holistically. Holistic observation can therefore be considered a result of training. The field of view is expanded during holistic observation so that the firm and soft edges of objects can be compared and correctly judged. When we say something feels a certain way, it is the result of such observation and judgment. Without holistic observation, that feeling is bound to be incorrect.
人的眼睛在沒有經過專業的訓練時,觀察物體時是散點式地、焦點遊走式地觀察,因而也就沒有主次、沒有虛實之別,也就是沒有整體的觀察。可以說整體的觀察是訓練的結果。整體觀察即是觀察的範圍較大,可以同時將物體上的虛實現象作出比較,得到正確的判斷,這種觀察和判斷就是我們常說的感覺。沒有整體觀察當然就沒有正確的感覺。
The form in the front is generally treated as being firm while those at the back are treated as being soft. Obvious transition from shape to shape is firm and gradual transition is soft. Strong contrasts between light and darkness are firm, and weaker contrasts are softer. And so on...
One of the characteristics of a good drawing is clear relationship of firm and soft edges. Perspectives are the foundation of drawing. Planar analysis enhances representation of volume. And rhythm of firm and soft edges is manifestation of the artist’s creativeness.
一般說來,前面的形體叫實,後面的叫虛。
形體轉折、起伏大的叫實、起伏小的平緩的叫虛。
明暗對比強的叫實,明暗對比弱的叫虛。等等……
一幅好的畫、一幅好的素描,一定具有虛實關係得當的優點。透視是作畫的基礎,體面觀是昇華了的塑形概念,而虛實節奏則是作畫者的靈性展現。
To create a drawing with great rhythm of firm and soft edges, first, avoid drawing from photos.
Use straight lines to block in and planar analysis to build shapes. Under a single source of light, because there are values and planes, there are firm and soft edges.
Planar analysis is the process of dissecting the subject into planes and can only be obtained through training. When you put planar analysis into training, when you can see planes in the subject, then you can see the major blocks of light, medium and dark values, and the value gradation within each plane, then there is the rhythm of firm and soft edges.
要畫出有虛實節奏的素描,首先,不要畫照片。
要用直線起稿,塊面造型。在單一光源,因爲有深淺,因爲有塊面,就會有虛實。
塊面通過理解以後,把對像塊面化,這是無中生有,要經過訓練。得到塊念的觀念,用塊面觀念看對像,有了塊面,就會區別層次,有深淺,明灰暗,就會有節奏,有虛實。
define observe 在 Alexander Wang 王梓沅英文 Facebook 的最佳貼文
【王老師寫給你看】用 GRE 分析寫作練邏輯思維、學寫,留學時台灣學生別再當美國學生的後援會啦!
除了「時間不夠」之外,準備 GRE 分析寫作的台灣考生最常碰到的致命傷就是寫了半天「沒有切題、討論到該討論的東西」。而這也是不管原本英文程度如何的學生、還是學霸指數多少的學生,都會遇到的狀況。
雖說很多考生都聽過「主題句」很重要(主題句 = 扣題立場+原因) ,但「實際操作」跟「頭腦裡知道」往往有很大的差距,大概 5 個學生裡有4 個就會偏題。
除此之外,我們的母語中文表達想法時的 vagueness ,也很常讓台灣考生偏題或沒掌握好題目的 scope 。
(e.g. 題目問高等教育對職涯發展的影響,結果學生一直在討論高等教育或是教育 )。
✔︎ 假設今天我們拿到了這個高頻題:
To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.
某學生在第二段寫了這樣的主題句:
First of all, the most important characteristics of a society can be defined in a variety of ways.
寫完後,我問了學生:
• 你覺得你這樣有回答到問題嗎?
• 你是如何分析這個題幹 (prompt) 的呢?
• 為什麼一開始就把 "understand" 和 "must study" 這兩個重要的概念給丟掉了了呢?
學生後來又加了一句話,變成 (原文直接呈現,無做調整)
First of all, the most important characteristic of a society can be defined in a variety of ways. Based on the reason, we may not rule out the possibility that the most attracting characteristic in one's heart is not existed in the major city.
• 加了第二句話後,我們又看到了至少4個問題:
(1) important characteristics 怎麼被過度成 attracting characteristics 了呢?(一字代換即離題)
(2) 補 in one's heart 的用意是什麼呢?
(3) 核心概念的 "of a society" 在第二句話消失了
(4) is not existed 為嚴重會導致扣分的文法錯誤(因文章有5處出現一樣的錯誤)。
啊,英文好難啊,你一定這樣想。怎麼會才寫兩句話,就那麼多問題呢?主因來自於大家忽略了好的學術寫作學習,需要系統性的訓練、和練習。很多考生都錯以為範文看一看、點子想一想就可以上場了。
➠ 依照著學生的想法,我試寫了一段:
I partially agree with the statement, as we can certainly gain a deeper understanding of some defining features of a society by studying its major cities, where we can easily observe the socio-cultural events, beliefs, and phenomena that collectively contribute to the construction of the "identity" of a society. However, it should be noted that some of these features that help define a society can ONLY be observed in small towns, as opposed to major cities. Therefore, if we wish to thoroughly--rather than partially--understand the most important characteristics of a society, we must study both big cities and small towns. For instance, ....
在我的改寫中你可以注意到,我沒有一句話會脫離「理解」的這個概念,我也盡可能的讓「社會」這個概念不離開我的寫作 (e.g. socio-cultural events, beliefs, and phenomena; some of these features that help define a society)。
政治、經濟算社會嗎?當然也算。但在時間有限的狀況下,直接寫 social-cultural 是最方便的處理方式。
另外你也可以注意到,我是部分同意了本文。我同意要理解一個社會最重要的核心特色,我們一定要研究大城市。但我在第三句話後面塞了 "thoroughly--rather than partially" 這樣的表達,去闡述如果要「夠全面的了解」只研究大城市不夠。
再回到學生最最一開始的版本:First of all, the most important characteristic of a society can be defined in a variety of ways. 你覺得好嗎?
若你接下來有準備 GRE考試的計畫,我將在 1/8 (三) 的 GRE 高分公開課中,我將基於8年的機經題庫,剖析GRE考試的最新趨勢和分享有效的備戰策略,若你/妳接下來有要備考GRE的計畫,歡迎你來參加喔!
➠ ➠【公開課報名】 ➠ ➠
https://www.accupass.com/event/1912220416341342776738
➤ 時間: 1/8 (三) 19:30 ~ 21:00 (19:00 進場)
➤ 地點: 台北市朱崙街60號2F (MRT 南京復興站)
【講師介紹】
王梓沅 (GRE V166 / 穩定 AW 5.5, PR 98、TOEFL 117、IELTS 滿分)
哥倫比亞大學應用語言學碩士
賓州大學 (UPenn) 社會語言學碩士
創勝文教共同創辦人、GRE 課程負責人
《GRE 學霸字彙》作者 (2019 眾文圖書出版)
define observe 在 Campus TV, HKUSU 香港大學學生會校園電視 Facebook 的最佳貼文
【專題訪問 Interview Feature】2019年度香港大學學生會周年大選中央幹事會候選常務祕書麥嘉晉訪問 | Interview with Mak Ka Chun Eugene, the Proposed General Secretary of Executive Committee, The Hong Kong University Students’ Union of Annual Election 2019
(Please scroll down for English version.)
麥嘉晉同學以一人莊姿態參選中央幹事會常務祕書一職,為除候選內閣「蒼傲」外,另一參選周年大選中央幹事會席位的單位。麥同學接受本台訪問,就其一人內閣的理念、參選原因、和自身網上流出片段解話,並就反對香港獨立及支持訂立國歌法作闡述。
訪問節錄如下:
1. 對常務祕書一職的了解?
我並不對常務祕書,即香港大學學生會中央幹事會的常務祕書的職責有太清楚的認識。
2. 為何參選常務祕書而非其他職位?
我參選常務祕書的原因是因為我認為自己並不能勝任主席(正確名稱應為會長)一職,我是一個小心、心思細密的人,能力主要在於常務祕書方面。
3. 你認為自己被釣狗公及流出不雅影片會否對選情有影響?
對於這件事,我明白大家對我有負面印象,我希望向對我有負面印象的人道歉,因為我令到香港大學的聲譽受損。但這件事也令到有些人認識了我,客觀而言,他們都會明白這是一個失誤,並知道這事並不影響我的政治理念或影響我向他們服務。我亦明白有人會因這件事對我有負面印象,我會努力透過選舉工程爭取選民對我的信心。
(參考資料:[有圖]求智囊團撚狗公 https://lihkg.com/t/640617/1?ref=android )
4. 你心目中學生會的立場是?
我們必須多考慮多角度及不同持份者的意見才作出表態,所以我不能肯定有幸當選後會作出什麼取態。我個人不太熱衷於政治方面,在大部分議題方面我的路線比較中間偏左。
5. 你為何決定單獨參選?
因為即使我未能組成內閣,我都希望做到我參選的目的,就是希望令人看到香港大學學生會並非像外界看來激進。我希望能令人看到香港大學的學生並不是只得一種思路,大家都有獨立思想,所以即使只有一人亦會參選。
6. 假若四位候選幹事同事當選,如何處理意見分歧?
如果日後四位候選人有幸一同當選,但就不同議題有相反意見的話,我認為政治取態並非港大學生會惟一職務,其他職務例如學生會組織的行政事務、和為學生提供福利、服務學生等等。所以我認為並不會單因為取態不同而辭職,其他事項不可以置之不理。
7. 你的政治光譜/政治立場是什麼?
我個人本身並不太熱衷於參與政治方面,在大部分議題我的立場傾向於中間偏左。
8. 你可否用香港的政治組織/政治人物代表自己?
個人而言我並不激進,所以我認為以前的民主黨可能比較能反映我現在的立場。如果從人物方面我認為湯家驊先生可能比較能反映到我,因為湯家驊先生和我一樣是比較會從多角度處事的人,其次他比較冷靜,不會草率進行評論和反應,而他亦不會就所有事情有既定立場,對不合理或不認該支持的事情他不會基於他泛民主派的立場而違背自己的理念,所以湯家驊先生及以前的公民黨會比較能反映和接近我的政治立場。
9. 你對初一事件的看法?
暫時可見旺角暴動或年初一事件方面,很多人都不太願意承擔自己的責任,而我認為很多參加者都罔顧了香港大眾的聲音和理念,亦危害了其他人的安全,我個人並不支持或同意這件事,如有人對這方面有意見的話,我希望大家能以理性方法表達意見。
10. 你是否支持香港獨立?
首先我不同意和不支持香港獨立。對於香港獨立我有幾點要回應。我不支持香港獨立的原因是因為,我認為香港多年來和中國有關係,香港在多方面亦須要中國的幫助,不論是經濟、社會、還是政策配套,我們都必須和中國有緊密連繫。當然我有不同意中國的政策,如對言論自由的打壓和對人權的打壓等,但我認為不應因反對中國而原全斷絕關係,始終歷史上我們和中國有非常緊密的聯繫,不可以因一些事去全盤否定中國,同時我認為香港獨立在法律上並不合法,所以我不會支持這種不合法的東西出現。因為香港獨立並不合法再加上這事並不合適,所以我並不支持香港獨立。但我認為可在可容許的空間內討論,例如學術層面或政治方面,我認為只要不鼓吹港獨,單純理性討論是可容許的,因為這是一種思想,而思想應可被討論。
11. 你是否同意訂立國歌法?
我認為國歌法的立法原意合理,並且應該,大家只要願意去尊重國歌和願意為自己的行為負責,我認為國歌法的立法有應該要的,因為我認為應尊重國歌。除了利用國歌表達意見外,還有很多意見表達的方式,雖然國歌法有機會收窄了大家的言論自由,但大家仍有其他對中國表達意見的渠道,所以我認為國歌法的影響並非如此誇張。
12. 你是否同意就廿三條法?
暫時短期而言不該對廿三條立法,但如果日後香港社會出現了嚴重的安全問題,而現時的法律制度未能控制,我認為廿三條立法......未必是廿三條立法,但應保障社會安全,加強執法,修改現有法律去增強它的權力、增強它的阻嚇性,希望能保障社會的安全。
Mak Ka Chun Eugene is running as a one-man cabinet in the Annual Election 2019. He is another candidate unit running for a seat in the Union’s Executive Committee, besides Prism, the proposed Cabinet of Executive Committee, The Hong Kong University Students’ Union in Annual Election 2019. Campus TV has interviewed with Mak, with regards to his vision of a one-man cabinet, the reason to run as candidate, and the leakage of his personal videos; he has also elaborated on his disagreeing with Hong Kong independence and supporting the enactment of the National Anthem Bill.
The interview excerpts are as follows:
1. What is your understanding of the post of General Secretary?
I might not have too clear of an understanding about the post of General Secretary, i.e. the duties of the General Secretary of Executive Committee, The Hong Kong University Students’ Union.
2. Why did you choose to run for the post of the General Secretary out of other posts?
The reason for running for the General Secretary is because I do not believe I have what it takes to assume the post of the Chairperson (the correct title should be: “President”). I am a rather careful and meticulous person, and my abilities are more in line with the area of the General Secretary, such as word/ document processing, and handling emails.
3. Do you think your incident* about being exposed as a womanizer, and the leakage of your explicit videos have an impact on your election campaign?
I understand that I have left a negative impression on some people from this incident; I would like to apologize to these people, because I have scathed the reputation of the University as a student of the University. In addition, this incident has made me known to public. Objectively speaking, some might consider the incident as a mistake, and that it would not affect my political stance or my service to them (members of the Students’ Union). Meanwhile, I do recognize that this incident has created a negative impression of myself, I will try my best to gain the trust of people from my election campaign.
*Mak Ka Chun Eugene was allegedly exposed as a womanizer, some explicit photos and videos of Mak in a conversation have been leaked by an anonymous account onto Lihkg, a public forum in Hong Kong.
4. What is the position of the Students’ Union in your eyes?
We should take into considerations the various perspectives and stakeholders’ opinions before declaring a stance, therefore I am not sure what I will be standing for should I be elected. Personally, I am not too keen on politics, but I would say that for most issues, I take more of a centre-left position.
5. Why did you decide to run as an independent candidate?
Despite not having formed a cabinet, I wish to fulfill my election aim: I hope to show the society how The Hong Kong University Students’ Union is not as radical and one-sidedly biased as how the society perceives it to be. I hope people could see that the Union has not only one path of thinking, everybody has individual thinking. Therefore, I would run as candidate even if I am doing so alone.
6. Should four proposed candidates of the Executive Committee be elected, how would discrepancy of views be dealt with?
If all four candidates have the honour to be elected, and have disparate views on issues, I think (acting on one’s) political views is not the Union’s only duty, there are other duties including administrative work, representing students, providing students’ welfare etc. Therefore, I do not think I would resign solely over a discrepancy on political views, other duties should not be neglected.
7. Where do you stand on the political spectrum? / How would you define your political stance?
I am not too keen on politics, but I would say that for most issues, I take more of a centre-left position.
8. Could you use a political group or a political figure in Hong Kong to represent yourself?
I think it is quite difficult to say, because Hong Kong’s politics has been so polarizing. Personally, I do not consider myself radical (politically), so I think the earlier Democratic Party better represents my current stance. In terms of a political figure, I think Mr Ronny Tong Ka-wah can better represent me, because like Tong, I know how to handle matters from multiple perspectives. Besides, Tong is a rather collected politician, he knows not to carelessly react and comment; he does not hold a predetermined stance towards issues, and he does not let his pan-democratic background dictate his views on matters that he thinks are unreasonable or not deserving of his support. Therefore, Mr Ronny Tong Ka-wah and the earlier Democratic Party is better proximate and representative of my political stance.
9. What are your views on the Mong Kok Incident in 2016?
What I observe currently about the Mong Kok Riot, or my apologies, it should be the Mong Kok Incident, is that many people are unwilling to bear responsibility for their actions, and I think a lot of the participants (of the incident) were rather reckless and negligent in considering the majority of Hong Kong’s opinion, they have also harmed the safety of many. I personally do not support nor agree with this action. However, I believe all voices should be heard, if anyone has an opinion on an issue, I hope they can convey them in a rational manner.
10. Do you support Hong Kong independence?
Firstly, I do not agree with nor support Hong Kong independence, but I think that the idea itself can be discussed on an academic or political level, as long as we are not encouraging the actualisation of it, we can have purely theoretical discussion because it is like any other thought or ideology that can be discussed. In response to Hong Kong independence, I have a few points to raise.
I do not support Hong Kong independence because I think that Hong Kong has established long years of relationship with China, Hong Kong needs the support of China in multiple areas, no matter economic, social, or policy-wise. We should always have a close connection to China. Certainly, I do not agree with all of China’s policies, for example the oppression of freedom of speech and of human rights, but I do not think we should cut ties with China entirely based on these disagreements. Ultimately, China and we have had a very close affiliation historically. At the same time, I think that Hong Kong independence is not legally justified, so I would not support such an illegal action. Because Hong Kong independence is not legal and not suitable, I do not support it.
11. Do you agree with the enactment of the National Anthem Bill?
I think the motive of the enacting the National Anthem Bill is justified, and (the act) should be encouraged. As long as everyone is willing to respect the national anthem and to bear responsibility for their own actions, I think the enactment of the National Anthem Bill is necessary, because I respect the national anthem. Besides using the national anthem as a form of self-expression (of political opinions or views), there are many other ways to communicate an opinion. Although freedom of speech might be harmed under the enactment of the bill, there are still other methods to convey our opinions about China, so I do not foresee the effect of the National Anthem Bill to be as severe as it is portrayed to be.
12. Do you agree with the enactment of Article 23?
Currently and in the short run, Article 23 should not be enacted. However, if Hong Kong experiences a problem of safety in the future, one that the current legal system has no power to control, I think that it may call for Article 23… not necessarily Article 23, but an enhanced enforcement of the law, the law should be amended to strengthen its power and deterring functions to ensure the safety of our society.
___________________________________
二零一九年度香港大學學生會周年大選其他候選人包括中央幹事會候選內閣蒼傲、校園電視候選內閣、學苑候選編輯委員會及候選普選評議員。
2019年度周年大選中央諮詢大會將於一月二十一日至一月二十五日在中山廣場舉行,時間為下午十二時半至二時半。
Other candidates for the Annual Election 2019 include Prism, the Proposed Cabinet of Executive Committee, the Proposed Cabinet of Campus TV, the Proposed Editorial Board of Undergrad, and the Proposed Popularly Elected Union Councillor.
The Central Campaign for Annual Election 2019 will be held from the 21st to 25th of January at the Sun Yat-sen Place, from 12:30 to 14:30.
define observe 在 Observe Meaning - YouTube 的美食出口停車場
... <看更多>